Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
Posted in Community :

Business & Strategy

 
Created by : B V Krishnamurthy, Consultant  | 03 03 2010 10:57:48 +0000
Industry : Teaching/EducationFunctional Area : Business Policy(Strategy & Execution)
Activity:  359 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

The Dysfunctional Organization

Jack Welch in his book The Borderless Organization implored managers to break down the horizontal barriers (hierarchical structures) and the vertical barriers (functional divisions) inherent in most organizations. By the time he retired from GE, he had rendered the structure nearly flat and had also succeeded in changing attitudes as between functional silos – a near ideal situation.

At the other extreme, Cohen has argued that decision making in the real world (in any domain) is a random outcome of the intersection of four independent parameters – problems, solutions, participants, and choice opportunities. He cites the classic case of the Chairman of a company attending a Board meeting on Monday having spent the Sunday on a golf course. One of the players is in financial trouble and is planning to sell his business (solution looking for a problem). When the Chairman reports this prospect of acquisition to the Board, the Marketing Director reports less than satisfactory results during the previous quarter (problem seeking a solution). The participants are powerful in the context of organizational politics. A decision is made to acquire the company in question. The combined revenues would make the situation look a little better the following quarter and the Chairman can feel the illusion of control (hubris). Surprised? In a forthcoming paper, we will demonstrate this is how decisions are made in most organizations.

Notwithstanding the plethora of literature available to prove that the only way for organizations to succeed in the long term is to adopt a systems approach and bring about synergy through team work, organization after organization that we have studied continue to operate in splendid compartmentalized functional isolation. Now answer these questions honestly:

Ø When was the last time you openly disagreed with your boss without offending her?

Ø When was the last time you had a frank discussion with your direct reports about your performance?

Ø When was the last time management backtracked on a major decision thanks to your compelling logic?

Ø When was the last time you made a rational decision as a team? (not the classical notion of economic rationality, nor the bounded rationality of the processualists but the adaptive rationality of the systemic thinkers)

Ø When was the last time you admitted you had erred, accepted your fallibility, learnt something in the process, and evolved for the better as an individual?

If you could quickly recall genuine instances in each case, congratulations – you belong to that exceptional miniscule minority and your organization must justifiably be proud of you. However, as we suspect, if you were uncomfortable coming up with credible answers, you belong to a significant majority that we call dysfunctional organizations. The writing is on the wall. Do something about it fast. Or be prepared to be confined to the dustbin of the numerous failures that dot the corporate landscape.

 

 
 Refer 18
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
A majority of organizations are dysfunctional Vs The dysfunctional organization is a myth
3
 
 
 
 
0
2
0
Support   Support
 
0
0

Most organizations are surviving and succeeding predominantly because of the 20% of the people who do 80% of the work. In most cases, a structured approach in management just doesn't exist. The concepts look good on paper but as the saying goes, it is easy to preach but difficult to practice. It is always that 20% who make things happen...the rest 80% will just watch things happen.

The symptoms of a dysfunctional organization are all too familiar - everyday is an adventure....people don’t talk about why they do what they do and show little concern for how their behavior affects others....difficulty following projects from beginning to end....it’s sort of every man for himself....lying when it is just as easy to tell the truth (we lie to ourselves first, others second)....criticizing or judging people without mercy....having difficulty communicating effectively, consistently and honestly with peers, subordinates and supervisors....pressure of turning a profit and the desire to impress combined with a lack of organizational skills leaves little time for fun....overreacting to changes over which managers and staff have no control....an environment of constantly seeking approval and affirmation....feeling super responsibility or super irresponsibility....demonstrating loyalty even when evidence indicates loyalty is undeserved ("go along to get along" behavior)....tendency to act impulsively without thoroughly considering the consequences....spending inordinate amounts of time on backtracking or damage control because of impulsive decisions.

So, what about the super successful organizations? the ones on top of the business lists? the most desirable places to work for?.....just substitute 30% or 40% instead of the 20% above....dysfunction is an inherent part of organizations....because organizations are made up of people, who are predominantly driven by emotions, which are predominantly irrational.


By venky , Freelancer, Freelancer  | 03 03 2010 13:01:59 +0000
0
0

A longitudinal study over nine years and covering over one thousand organizations has revealed the startling fact that open communication systems - bottom up, lateral and diagonal are absent in most organizations. Managers continue to operate in silos. More alarmingly, the attitude is one of outright denial - we can do no wrong, ours is the best way, this is how we have generated profits for many years... Even the recognition that there may be a better way seems to be missing. Organizations in the developed world paid a heavy price for this arrogant attitude. Has the bell started to toll for us as well? Sustained success has to be tempered with humility. As the old saying goes, pride goes before a fall. For organizations, it may well be a free fall into an abyss.


By B V Krishnamurthy, Consultant  | 03 03 2010 10:57:48 +0000
Leading Recruitment Firm
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
Viewers also viewed
Intrapreneurship is now hot topic, organizations are hitting hard on it. A change in culture is...
 
498 referals 5 votes, 801 views
Should men get Paternity Leave vs Men do not need Paternity Leave
 
2038 referals 24 arguments, 416 views
In past few years the budget for the education of children has seen a rise. There are m,any...
 
547 referals 16 arguments, 225 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (2)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 97 views
These days as I switch on the tv or radio or look at a hoarding I do feel that power of ads I...
 
3004 referals 23 arguments, 492 views
more...  
More From Author
Did they have credibility in the first place? Anyone who thinks IPL is about cricket is mistaken. It is a front for speculation and activities that would normally not be permissible under the law of the land. Big money is riding on it. Why is there so...
By providing challenging opportunities and true participation. In the established organizations, talented people often get frustrated because they are like small fish in an ocean. The myth of job security has been cast through the window by the global...
more...