GOOD & EVIL

 A specific act of a human being may be called "evil" by some body on the basis of traditions, but it may be good for others. Hence all evils are not evils,some of evils are also good.

I am in favour of Mr. Dixit. One should follow"good" instead of "  evil" by applying his own concept and thought, which will be benificial to human society.

I do agree with the view points of Sarika Singh.We should not blame others for their faults,rather we have to make them understand about the reality.

But all the humanbeings are materialistic because of anomoly/descriminations in administration. All are in a bussiness mentality. Even countries also. God is the creation of all. So how a man will ocupy number of buildings and many residential plots, when others are not in a position to buy a single peice of land. Because of the faulty rules and regulations. Corruption in distribution and manymore....

I am in support of "GOOD" because I am a good man.

One should follow it.

God has not created the exact word "Good" and "evil". It is a creation of individual. When there was no script,no language,no cities,no cultivation , what was the life of humanbiengs? In the earlier days people were like nomads and situation compelled them to do evil works. Even now a days situation compelled a good person to be evil.

Hence one should follow good instead of evil.

Yes, one should follow goodness instead of evil. The present society is a materialistic society and hence I admit the comments of "Versa". Now a days all the religious people are also not good. They are also having evil nature. If, all will follow good, than the valuation of the 100 types of difference currecies of 248 countries could be equalised. Even,  I also suspect "POPE", who is the higest preacher of christian community. So all are evils and it is too difficult to find atleast 0001% good people in the world. The ingrediants of good and evil should also be defined clearly.

However, I am in favour of good. One should follow it.

This is the matter of interpretaion and execution in one's self aspect..... though in today's world you need to know evil aspects of life to protact you against of it but if you are following good qualities you will definitely end up good.....  

Yes one should follow it.

Obviously correct.

Obviously correct. We the people have created the word " good & evil" in hindi "achha & bura". I do agreee with Mr. Dikshit's argument. Mahatma means a great soul and his observation is quite acceptable by all. From the womb of a mother the child came to the earth with good ingrediants and the society compelled him to do evil activities. Hence a person by birth is not evil. Hence, we should not hate the evil person,rather we should try our level best to make him understand to eradicate evils. We should hate evil.

Any more....

First of all, we have to understand what is GOOD and EVIL? They are nothing but absence of bad and Good qualities respectively. Secondly, Why these qualities occur ? The simple reason is, man only thinks about himself so he supresses other in direct or indirect ways. The second option of this debate is- Leave it on others and its very sad to see people support that also. Swami Vivekananda once said- The easiest way to drive away evil from society is by not searching fault in others but in one's ownself. So, I also believe we, rather than blaming others, check our own faults, then there will be no evil in the society...

madam versa,

we have to remove the evil, if we dont see the person wih evil and see only good things in him then only we can get success,

All Good is based on EvilAll our "good" motivations are based on carnality, materialism, selfishness and therefore rely on evil. When people deny evil and pretend these things are not true then they veer from honesty and become less in touch with the good things that they attempt to embrace.