Should PWCoopers firm close down operations in India ?

I would like to point out two things regarding.  Auditing of a software company have unique challenges, dealing in intangible product - software, inventory valuation, wip estimation, work completed etc are difficult. Second thing ,( just hear say) while discussing about article trainee’s life in the top 4 firms, I heard about pwc’s article trainees having to work continiously for 3 days, so that they could have enough audit evidence for the past 6 to 7 years. I think we should wait until there is more clarity regarding the quality of the audit, fairness of reconciliation of bank deposits,  corroborative evidences  etc and most importantly how much PWC can be held liable even if found guilty, as they claim L&L to be a network firm.

How can you check doctored papers and books? How can you possibly point a finger and say that we are being hoodwinked when the evidence (evidently false) is suggesting nothing untoward??

Auditors rely on facts that are being shown by way of BoA and other billed expenses and incomes. When those are cleverly doctored by a a manipulator ... God help them!! PwC have every right to respond to a summon and justify the process in which they were hoodwinked. If anyone of them has been corrupted by the system... Well well well... let the judiciary decide. I do not think that they need ro shut shop for one blemish!!

It is not necessory to close down because the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which is probing the multi-crore Satyam accounting fraud, has given a clean chit to PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), the firm’s erstwhile statutory auditors.

The CBI, in its supplementary chargesheet filed on November 24 at the XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, revealed that the auditors S Gopalkrishnan and Srinivas Talluri, were employees of Lovelock & Lewes (L&L) and that the remuneration, which Satyam paid to the auditors, reached the accounts of L&L instead of PwC, which was appointed as the statutory auditor in 2001.

“The actual statutory audit of Satyam was in fact conducted by a firm called L&L and not by PwC, who was appointed by the investors during the AGM,” said the CBI in its supplementary report, a copy of which is available with Express. It added that the audit team members who assisted Gopalakrishnan and Srinivas were employees of L&L and not that of PwC and thereby steering clear of PwC’s role in the entire scam.
It must be noted that PwC acquired L&L almost a decade ago. However, technically, L&L operated as a PwC network firm in India and hence L&L partners weren’t allowed to sign anything on behalf of PwC.

Earlier in June 2009, Ramesh Rajan, Chairman and CEO, PwC India, too informed CBI regarding the acquisition made by PwC and that partners of L&L weren’t authorised to sign on behalf of PwC.

In January 2009, both Gopalakrishnan and Srinivas were arrested on charges of alleged involvement in fudging the books of accounts of Satyam. Subsequently, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, regulatory body of accountants, removed membership of Gopalakrishnan from all the eleven non-standing committees. Auditing firms Deloitte and KPMG are currently restating the books or accounts and likely to complete the process by July 2010