yes , it.s a right move this must have been done earlier. AS if your child is slapped by a neighbour , you will not accept it ,but if your child is doing same mistake in front of you . H e will be beaten by you for which you would'nt be guilty. Similarly others police or army handles your public it would'nt be acceptable to any one.
By
rakeshbhatnagar , GM Projects., wig brothers india pvt.ltd.
| 09 06 2010 14:35:41 +0000
yes they should move out. infact this operation was wrong. they could not found nuclear weapons there and who is US to do this. this should be done be UNO if necessary. this not nuclear weapon. this is something else i.e. "tel ka khel"
By
sanjay kumar mangal, IT , TATA Group Co.
| 09 02 2010 02:35:12 +0000
AN UNSUCCESSFUL US HAS NO ALTERNATIVE BUT TO GET OUT OF IRAQ. IT WAS A BLUNDER ON PART OF US TO INVADE IRAQ FOR NO REASONS. IN FACT, THEY SHOULD BE PUT ON TRIAL.
By
Suresh Prasad Gupta, Freelancer, Pharmaceuticals
| 09 01 2010 17:43:04 +0000
In the first place U.S.has no right to interfere in the affairs of not only Iraq but any other nation for that matter.After suffering loss of lives,of U.S forces,Millions of $ U.S now has the only option of moving out of Iraq,having failed in its mission.
By
s.baalu , Consultant, XYZ LTD
| 09 01 2010 12:51:14 +0000
I agree with Nisha US could vacate from Iraq earlier than this. As Rathan said we have to wait and see what is next.
By
George Varghese, Proprietor, Jecyees
| 09 01 2010 12:39:12 +0000
I am in total agreement with you Disha. The forcees should have been gone back much earlier. Unfortunately, Iraq may not turn into another Afganisthan or Somalia. We should wait and see.
By
Rathin Deb, Freelance Retail Consultant
| 09 01 2010 12:23:56 +0000
AS rightly said by Ms. Disha, this decision should've been taken long back. Every country has a right to live the way they want to be, not under any kinda pressure. So people will have a Breather.
By
Sunil gupta, Marketing Manager, KCC Pvt ltd.
| 09 01 2010 11:32:08 +0000
We can not make out a strategic analysis of the pull-out. But, what we normally observe is that, - Mr. Obama fulfils his election promise to his citizen.
- Allow Iraqi to run govt, particularly , when there is no majority among them.
- Civil aids will continue from US, till such time, they are self reliant.
By
KALIYAMOORTHY , Oil & Gas Area Coordinator, Undisclosed
| 09 01 2010 10:59:58 +0000
Any country takes any step especially when it relates to matters in other countries, its decision is solely based on its national interest. Especially so when its the country like USA which is the sole superpower and it will excatly do whatever is in its interest- this has been aptly described in whatever steps it has taken during last 100 years or so. Being stay-put in Iraq was fetching US the diminishing returns with rising casualties among its troops as well as civillians, resentment among Muslim world, rising cost to US exchequer especially when other NATO members are not ready to commit more troops or money on foregn conquests especially after recession, etc . Also there should be the limit to the foreign occupation and more so for Obama who had promised his electorate of troop withdrawal from Iraq as well as Afghanistan soon. Moreover American public itself is resenting the wasteful expenditure or bailout packages provided by US administration. Looking at the circumstances it was the most sensible things the US could do at this moment and not to mention that there are still 50 thousand soldiers still in Iraq who will assist the local govt to take control of the situation.
By
Prabhakar Srivastava, Director on Board & Corporate Strategist, Indo Western Tradelinks Ltd
| 09 01 2010 09:55:09 +0000
Yes definitely it is a wise and right decision. It should have been done very long back in order to stop the destruction of Irag. Now the country Irag has been economically deteriorated by the invasion of US which wanted to control the oil price. Thanks for the referral Ms. Disha Roy.
By
NATTERAJA R. ARIKRISHNAN, AREA SALES MANGER, UNIFLEX CABLES LTD
| 09 01 2010 09:23:14 +0000
The decision to move out of Iraq should have been taken long back. The occupation of Iraq by the US troops only led to misery, grief and casualties on both sides.... The final goal was not achieved and it is also difficult to achieve it. Invasion or occupation of an alien nation by another nation for trying to resolve issues does not work in the long term as the resentment felt by the civilians of the occupied nation ensures that the issues are not resolved and it only leads to further degeneration and anarchy in the occupied nation.... The US is aware of all this background (Vietnam war is a case in point) and it was just a matter of time before the US decided to evacuate Iraq based more on expediency rather than on other grounds.....
By
Badri N Srinivasan, Head - Quality, Valtech India Systems Pvt. Ltd.
| 09 01 2010 08:06:47 +0000
|
They will never pull out of IRAQ completely. If at all, why they have eneterd into IRAQ? US has played a vital role in disturbng the peace in middle east to fulfill their own dirty agendas. US is the only nation on earh that can be termed as "terrorist nation"... They are famous for pushing their agenda of peace keeping & humanitarian help without asking to disturb the peace & creating humanitarian disasters.
By
Zubair Irshad, Projects Manager, DIAR Consult
| 09 01 2010 09:38:13 +0000
|