I had been keenly observing the developments on this issue, and strongly feel, that with showing some flexibility and cooperating with state government home ministry, Lalit Modi would have been able to retain IPL in India. Instead, IPL people tried to act oversmart and pressurize Government to accept their time table. IPL is a popular tournament all right. But it can't be important to cause impact on Parliament election process. There is also an argument that India should have used this opportunity to demonstrate their capability. We know that, if time comes, India has potential to take on bigger challenges than this. But as far as possible, we should try to simplify situation to save the costs (which means saving tax payer's hard earned money).
By
Prakash Saitwal, Technical Support Manager, Aditya Birla Management Corporation P. Ltd.
| 04 27 2009 06:19:51 +0000
IPL is moved to SA.. It was possible to shift the game to any other country/timing according to convenence. Where as Indian Parliament Elections can happen only in India.. :-) and the time was also fixed.. So what the Govt. did is absolutely right.. Election is very much important than a cricket tournment..
By
Shaju George, Facilities/Construction Manager, IBS Software Services (P) Ltd
| 04 22 2009 11:35:13 +0000
It's true, we still remember the attack on Srilankan cricketers and we need to be very careful these antinational elements can go to any extent. And for us elections were more important we can not postpone the dates and IPL should have consulted the government before deciding the match dates or hired private security agencies with permission. Anyways it's not an issue but yes a revenue loss and a big lesson for all of us. Let's be more careful next time.
By
B.Mehernath , Marketing & Technical Head, Bondit Construction Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
| 04 22 2009 11:08:49 +0000
Well to begin with We must understand the gravity of the situation the population of UP India equals the population of south afeica and it is only half of 1/4 of of our land mass the point is we cannot compare and say the South african can give fool proof security why dont the Indian goverment it self is immuture arugment factoring in the fact that there is no retrad Pakistani Muslim terroist who want to kill every one.......... Insugent activicty peaks in the election time it correct in declining security for IPL.............Still dont get it close your eyes and imagine this . Edan garden packed to the to brim with KKR VS MBI the crowd going wilde suddenly couple od Ajmal Kasab walkinside withn backpack and AK 47 and start killing innocent people .........well you get the idea
By
R.SANJAY GREGORY WILLIAMS, HR-Admin MNager, CItrisys solutions
| 04 22 2009 10:26:50 +0000
Oh well...i dont know that why i cant make my mind for Yes or no... i think, i m still not clear about the fact, i m not clear that whether this was due to security or due to politics played by Indian leaders. But the conslusion comes out that IPL is going great, last year i have not seen any of IPL match, but yaa this time I am not gone a miss.
By
sachin , Team Leader -(NonTechnical), Infor Global Solutions
| 04 22 2009 09:14:52 +0000
|
Really agree with you Sayan...they've just showed how vulnerable we are to such things...if the IPL was conducted here itself, then we would have given strong message that India indeed is safe for all...and by moving the tournament out of India was the biggest Mistake..as one can see the fans there are just coming for entertainment and to see their country players perform. and you see so many empty stands all over...but in India it would have been totally different...so it was a bad decision....
By
Chandan Roy, Creative, J Walter Thompson
| 05 15 2009 07:08:52 +0000
WoW!! It's a classic example--I thought more people would be in favour of "NO"--It's just opposite. Any ways--I do not know what are the reasons and what are the justification--But on first go--it's a real shame---We can't provise security to our guests??? Is that what comes out in the end? Doesn't it mean that way? Or still some justifications are ready? Real strange--We have now learnt to hide wounds
By
Sayan Chakraborty, Senior ERP Consultant, International Business machines
| 05 14 2009 19:19:52 +0000
Completely agree with both the points mentioned by Mr.Darpan.If the government of India is unable to provide security for an event like IPL then how can it make sure that there will be proper security arrangements for commonwealth games which is in a year's time.Refusing for adequate security for IPL means that there will be question marks raised over other sporting events in the country too & that is definitely not good for sports in general for our country.They say that India is poised to become a superpower in a decade time but if the country is not having sufficient security for the events happening in the country then how can they think of becoming super power in future.This was a very bad example of our country in front of the whole world.
By
Samir Das, Tech Architect, Infosys
| 05 14 2009 06:47:05 +0000
No i don't think so,I agree that India is a huge country and providing security for two important events at the same time was very difficult but by doing this we are endangering our chances of hosting sports tournaments in the future.And as you all must be aware that New Delhi is seheduled to host CommonWealth Games in 2010 and by saying that we can't provide security for IPL,Indian government has not send a good message to people across the world.Now there will be doubt on our capability that whether India is a safe place to host sporting ties and can it preovide sufficient security for it.In my view it was not a wise decision on part of Indian authorities to decline to provide security for IPL.
By
Dayanand Deshpande, Senior Consultant, Ernst & Young
| 04 21 2009 08:42:06 +0000
|