What comes first for Indian CEOs - company or self?

According to a study, CEOs are less likely to pursue actions that advance their interests at the expense of the organization and its stakeholders. But in Indian context, the matter is completely opposite. A few days back we saw the examples of Ramalinga Raju, the Founder and Chairman of Satyam Computer Services, an alumnus of the Harvard Business School as well as the winner of several awards and global accolades, such a man also did a corporate scam of $2 million US dollars just for personal interests. Another case is of Sanjay Kumar, a former Indian CEO of Computer Associates, did an accounting fraud of $52 million over a period of 2 years

It seems that a CEO who identifies strongly with his or her firm will see nothing wrong with using the company resources for personal use, but our findings suggest the opposite to be the case. Such executives tend to shun lavish perquisites that shareholders and the public resent, perks which is associated with significant under-performance of company stock. CEOs with strong company identification also tend to avoid corporate strategies that are likely to be at odds with the interest of shareholders. They are less than half as likely as CEOs with weak company identification to increase their companies' level of unrelated diversification, a strategy that the study characterizes as a form of corporate empire-building, associated with lower financial performance, lower stock prices, and greater institutional pressure to divest.

So friends, according to you, What comes first for Indian CEOs - company or self?