Nehru Family Ruined India
By
LAXMI , NGO
| 05 06 2012 19:18:24 +0000
@ Pooja, it is a public domain. Whatever may be your feelings, its not the style of expression of anguish. You or me or some other have no right to talk against the father of the nation. For the sake of the nation, he sacrificed his life. Dont forget that. What you and me made for the nation. It is easy to criticise anyone. What you did to your family, your locality?
By
Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.
| 02 22 2012 09:40:55 +0000
i hate jawahar lal ... it was a pact btwn gandhi n jawahar for P.M post n fathr of nation. aftr indira adopted gandhis surname ...he was choosen fathr of nation. both bastards.. while Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel was a great man.. He should have been our PM .. these gandhi family is jst making politics there family business... Adding lots of money in der swiss accnt .All jawahar,Indira Gandhi ,soni,rahul are bastards..
By
pooja , Cinematographer, Nomura Real Estate
| 02 19 2012 20:36:01 +0000
OF COURSE SARDAR BALLABH BHAI PATEL.
By
sunil kumar, PROGRAMER, INS
| 10 07 2011 20:59:44 +0000
Any proof Rathin Bhai to back such a remark on three of the most prominent Indians of modern era. If not your post is highly childish and reeks of irresponsibility.
By
Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels
| 08 22 2011 14:31:05 +0000
REMOVE FAKE GANDHIS There are at least 10 Crore people in India, who are more capable, educated, experienced & Patriotic than these Fake Gandhis Starting from Indira to Sanjay to Rajiv to Sonia to Priyanka to Rahul nobody falls in the Category of Educated & Intellectual Class, they are either below Graduate or somehow Graduate...... Like Nehru was Imposed on us in place of Sardar Ballabhbhai Patel, Indira was also imposed on us by the Puppets in Congress Rajiv came through back door (Sympathy Wave) - He was the foollest & the most Corrupt of all Fake Gandhis Sonia (Antonio Maino) is a total Fraud, but presently the Rajmata.......... Priyanka & Rahuls are two Kids, promoted by Doggy Raja & others........
In my opinion Amish, Sumanta Sahu, Nagesh Rao, Gurleen Kaur, Mohan Murari, S. Muralidharan, Raju V P, Vrushank Dave & Ajay Khaitan (Me Included) etc ....... are much more qualified & knowledgeable than these Fake Gandhis............. Keep writing....... Keep fighting......... against these Corrupt, Cruel, heartless & Coward Congress... till they are removed from India..
They are so cruel, they have no shame in attacking 1 Lac peaceful People while sleeping..... they are more Cruel than Ravan, Kansh, Hiranyakashyap, Hiranakshya & other Daityas & Rakshas
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 07 05 2011 19:05:49 +0000
Thanks Mr Rathin Deb, You clear some of my doubt.
By
Vrushank Bharatkumar Dave, Area Business Manager, Elder Pharmaceutical Ltd
| 07 05 2011 17:24:59 +0000
Vrushank first of all nobody to beat Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel should have been the first Prime Minister. In case Jinnah, would have been made the first PM the country wound not have been divided. Panditji dont stand a chance to become a PM but Gandhiji promised Motilal that he will ensure Neheru will be given his due.
By
Rathin Deb, Advisor and retail consultant, currently as Branch Manager, Tower Infotech Ltd
| 07 05 2011 04:56:56 +0000
Munshiji Plz Don't justify Gandhi or Nehru, Everybody knows them, see the votes, Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel - 22, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehu - 5 Democracy is upheld by Peoples' Mandate, not by the Recruiting Skills of Gandhi or anybody else, India is not a Private Limited company
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 07 03 2011 18:34:42 +0000
I think the problem not started with the first PM recruitment but it started with Terms and Conditions on what we agreed with Britishers to set India free from their jurisdiction(which never happened till date).
By
Rohit Thakur, Electrical Engineer-Industrial, Quality Engineering and Software Technologies
| 07 03 2011 17:50:01 +0000
Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel was the best choice, but Mahatma Gandhi superseded & imposed Nehru on us. Nehru converted democracy into Dynastic / Family rule, the most unfortunate........for all of us till today
In 1930, Mahatma Gandhi prevented Netaji Subhas Bose to become President of Congress Party. What does this prove ????
1. Mahatma Gandhi was not a Democratic Person 2. He had some Illicit relations / Commitments / pacts with Mr Nehru
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 07 03 2011 06:03:38 +0000
No need to think He's Only Mr. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. I am agreed with Mr. S. Murlidharan.
By
Hiren Sheth, Sr. Sales , Al Nabooda Group
| 07 02 2011 15:10:53 +0000
Of course " Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel". He was Iron man with Full of Leadership Qualities.
By
Mr. Rommy Disoza, Freelancer, Freelancer
| 07 02 2011 08:56:57 +0000
Before independence There were dispute between Mr Naheru and Mr Mohmadali Zinha for post of PM. At that time Gandhiji was supporting to Mr Zinha to be a PM as the threat of partition was given by Mr jinha but Mr Naheru was not agreed on this. Which resulted in partition of country India and Pakistan. After Indepenece there were two eligible candidates for the post of PM, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Mr Naheru. Majority of indian People and Congress party were suppoting to Sardar Patel. But Mr Neharu with support of Gandhiji counldn't let his dream down to be first PM of india once again he didn't agreed on this. He did whatever he can and ultimatly Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel had taken back his candidature for the post of PM and accept Home Ministory. Sardar Patel's dream was to serve the country rather to fall in dirty politics. The above mention post I have read somewhere. I dont know wheather it is true or false. I request Mr S. Murlidharan and Mr Suryanarayan Murthy to focus some light on this as I consider them more knowledgeble and exprienced among us.
By
Vrushank Bharatkumar Dave, Area Business Manager, Elder Pharmaceutical Ltd
| 07 02 2011 08:26:46 +0000
Once again I Support Vrushank Bharatkumar Dave, Nagesh Rao, S.Muralidharan & all those who support Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 07 01 2011 14:39:01 +0000
The Iron Man, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. If he could be PM, we have not been facing problem of Kashmir. We had trouble of China because of Mr Nehru only. He consider enemy as friend. He had no vision. Mr Suryanarayan Murthy.
By
Vrushank Bharatkumar Dave, Area Business Manager, Elder Pharmaceutical Ltd
| 06 29 2011 17:24:42 +0000
No doubt Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel was the best choice & elected leader. But at that point of time Britishers has suggested Nehru in-order to have policy & investment support to India by western countries, whose leaders' were more comfortable with Nehru, who was impressed by his speech, personality, Education,suave & articulate over all ardent follower, almost 'yes man' to Mahathmaji,made him as then PM. Nehru is not bad but his policies were bad & sown the seed of corruption,dishonesty among most of the congressmen & thro their unbaked policy has helped greedy Rich becomes Rich & Poor becomes Poor, which is continuing today.
By
nagesh rao, Freelancer, Freelancer
| 06 29 2011 12:50:33 +0000
Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel was the best choice, but Mahatma Gandhi superseded the Election Results & imposed Nehru on us. Nehru converted democracy into Dynastic / Family rule, the most unfortunate........for all of us till today
In 1930, Mahatma Gandhi prevented Netaji Subhas Bose to become President of Congress Party. What does it prove ????
Even Mahatma Gandhi was not a Democratic Person or may be he had some illicit relations / commitments with Mr Nehru
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
| 06 29 2011 12:06:54 +0000
We can change India with or without Baba Ramdev & Anna Hazare There are only few problems 1. We are not united / Unanimous
2. We are not taking the Lead 3. We are egoistic & always fighting 4. Not really interested in Solutions 5. Always blaming others 6. Hatred of any kind
Solutions
1. Honesty 2. Love / Respect
3. Truthfulness 4. Faith / Trust 5. Determination
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
| 06 29 2011 11:18:56 +0000
I would vote for Sardar Patel because he would have banned the RSS and IUML then and there in 1947. If he couldn't do that then definitely when Gandhi was assassinated he would have banished the RSS and beaten up their leaders and would have made them cry loudly saying.. "we will not these do type of things again". That is why he is called the IRON man of india. Nehru was a professional who tried to accommodate everybody but Patel was a visionary which means that there would have been no RSS or IUML today but Patel never got the chance to be a PM - nice guys finish last!
By
Munshi Ramchand, Retired
| 06 23 2011 03:42:16 +0000
This man Ajay Kumar Khaitan has got multiple different profiles here 1:- http://toostep.com/inventor- khaitan/profile 2:- http://toostep.com/ajay- kumar-khaitan/profile 3:-http://toostep.com/ ajaykumarkhaitan/profile 4:-http://toostep.com/ ajay541kumar541khaitan/profile I am not sure what he intends to do by making multiple profiles, may be it becomes easier to report anyone abuse or something like that. This is in itself a serious issue.
By
aditya j s, Freelancer, Automobile
| 06 23 2011 02:21:57 +0000
Well said, Mr S. Muralidharan, what a fantastic Argument, In my opinion - the best so far............
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
| 06 18 2011 08:46:22 +0000
But for Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel, 500-odd princely States would not have been united to become a Composite India! Obviously, IRON MAN, should have been the PM in 1947! He would not have nurtured this DYNASTIC Rule in this country, we are still struggling to get away with it!
By
S. Muralidharan, Executive Director, Knowledge Foundation & Campus Around the Corner
| 06 18 2011 08:37:37 +0000
Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel should have been a better prime minister. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru has been the worst Prime Minister of Congress Government after ManMohan Singh.
By
Gurleen Kaur, CMD, GKM IT & Engineering
| 06 18 2011 07:54:03 +0000
Mohammad Ali Jinnah would have been the first Atheist Prime Minister of India
By
konkan SINGHA, business DEVELOPMENT, SpeechWareNet
| 06 18 2011 07:31:12 +0000
Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel was the best choice, Nehru converted democracy into family ruled country, the most unfortunate........for all of us. JAWAHARLAL - INDIRA - SANJAY - RAJIV - SONIA - PRIYANKA - RAHUL etc. Interestingly, JAWAHARLAL changed the surname 'NEHRU' to 'GANDHI' to deceive Indians forever
By
Ajay Kumar Khaitan, Consultant
| 06 01 2011 19:52:42 +0000
Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel was the best choice, Nehru converted democracy into family ruled country, the most unfortunate........for all of us. JAWAHARLAL - INDIRA - SANJAY - RAJIV - SONIA - PRIYANKA - RAHUL etc. Interestingly, JAWAHARLAL changed the surname 'NEHRU' to 'GANDHI' to deceive Indians forever
By
Ajay Kumar Khaitan, Consultant
| 06 01 2011 19:51:31 +0000
Dhairya I will go with sardar ballabh bhai patel. It is because of him Hyderabad, Jodhpur, Junagarh are with India today. After all he was known as iron man and really so.
By
Rathin Deb, Advisor and retail consultant, currently as Branch Manager, Tower Infotech Ltd
| 05 31 2011 13:19:43 +0000
There is no point in discussing the issue after 64 yrs., of its happening. I cant corner Panditji though he made some irrevocable mistakes particular in J & K issue and the like. Patelji who is considered to be iron man would have taken a different stance on it. Pakistan would have not been there on the map. But these are imaginary. Panditji did his very best with a kind of vision, yet he committed some mistakes. I cant weigh the two legends.
By
Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.
| 05 31 2011 08:26:32 +0000
I support your statement, Kumar. I support for Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, as he don't have any self-interest for the post as Mr. Nehru have.
By
SHRIKANT MANOHAR DANKE, Project Manager, Phadnis Infrastructur Ltd
| 05 31 2011 07:10:41 +0000
There is no doubt about this the answer would be always is SARDAR BALLABH BHAI PATEL. He is the actual long visionary for India.
By
Kumara Swamy, Project Associate, IIIT-H
| 05 31 2011 06:42:41 +0000
Chose your answer very precisely.Please specify your cause for the chosen answer.
By
Dhairya kumar(ДХАИРЯ КУМАР ), Service/Maintenance Engineer, Electrical
| 05 31 2011 06:27:08 +0000
|
Dear Ajoy has gone on driving his point again and again. He was neither born at that time, nor I was of the age to understand the status of contemporary India at that point of time.We all have heard and read the information from somebody who might have been biased, or ignorant of the issue in all its perspective.Jinna was a scoundrel and like Shakespear's Shylock, wanted to have his pound of flesh! Mohatma Gandhi being a fearless person, why he agreed with the division, knowing fully well the future consequences, I could not make out.I can only visualize the condition of the contemporary country, where it had no internal resources, no friend, no experience, and whole world was in a devastated mess! Sardar Ballabhbhai was a strong personality and the way he brought the 500 and odd princely states within the fold of the country in such a short time and crisis, is itself a miracle we can never forget. But running a totally disorganized country, building a nation, is something different,may be not his cup of tea. Sir Winston Churchill, the architect bringing victory to the allied forces in the second world war, was defeated in the very next election by his own countrymen!Clement Attlee was made the Prime Minister!Britishers said, winning a war is one thing but building up a devastated country is a different job altogether! Ajoy , suggest what should be done now!Whole country is now in the hands of a bunch of scoundrels, ruling or opposition, all opportunists, amassing money for their own pro genies and doing nothing else.Let bygone , be bygone!!
By
Dipak Bhattacharya, Chief Engineer, SCSPL
| 05 06 2012 17:32:29 +0000
Nehru was far ahead of his times. A man of vision, without any inclination to any religion, and person who held good respect within the majority of intellectuals the world over. We have to only wonder at the shrewd political animal that Ghandhiji was. He strongly backed Nehru although Panditji's was far removed from Bapu's ideology than Sardar Patel. Similarly Nehru struck with Gandhiji as a trusted lieutenant during the freedom struggle in-spite of his ideological differences. Not once did they let their personal ambition, pride or ill-flated ego come in the way. A lesson the so called Gandhians of today and political leaders can very well do to follow. The nation comes first.
By
Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels
| 08 23 2011 04:59:01 +0000
Khaitanji - http://toostep.com/insight/the-true-face-of-bharathiya-janatha-party---part-1
By
Munshi Ramchand, Retired
| 07 05 2011 13:34:22 +0000
Khaitanji, Gandhiji was a very good recruiter, he had a very good team from hindus, muslims, sikhs, christains, parsi, rich,poor etc etc. Each member of his team was a star player. So, it really doesn't matter whether Patel or Nehru became the PM. Regarding dynasty rule - please read the list that I provided which shows the names of BJP leaders and their son/daughter who is working for the party.
By
Munshi Ramchand, Retired
| 07 02 2011 04:47:17 +0000
Khaitanji, who is a democratic person? Do we have rules for that?. Mahatma Gandhi must have felt something wrong with Patel's resume, he must have felt something good with Nehru's resume - can we say that Gandhi as a recruiter had a pact,commitments?? Same thing with N.S.Bose, Gandhiji must have felt something not good with Bose(like...too young, not matured enough, etc)
By
Munshi Ramchand, Retired
| 07 02 2011 04:38:18 +0000
India at the Top - No Taxes, No Corruption Corruption Free India within a month, All Corrupt people will tremble with fear & nobody will dare to Loot & Terrorise India. I can make India Tax Free & there will be surplus money. I am not talking about bringing back the black Money from foreign banks, but I will create Money from the presently available Resources. Job for all by Bringing Indian Economy on the Fastest Track Free & Best Medical treatment for all - No Mediclaim needed, after all, life of every Citizen is Important
Like Atal Behari Vajpayeeji, Best Infrastructure from North to South & East to west and connecting Rivers to control Floods & Droughts
Best Education for all, no Competitive Exams at all, bcoz Education is the most Fundamental Right of every Citizen & nobody should be Deprived. More importance to Science & Technology to fetch Nobel Prizes Limited Cricket & equal Promotion of all the Sports & Games Court Judgements within 2-3 months, all pending cases to be disposed within 6-12 months There is a long list in my mind............I will make all Happy, nobody will be in Distress...... SUGGESTIONS INVITED....
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
| 06 28 2011 14:44:36 +0000
@Khaitan - here is a nice article for you to read...http://toostep.com/insight/hindutav-s-foreign-tie-up
By
Munshi Ramchand, Retired
| 06 28 2011 09:21:01 +0000
This man Ajay Kumar Khaitan has got multiple different profiles here 1:-http://toostep.com/inventor- khaitan/profile 2:- http://toostep.com/ajay- kumar-khaitan/profile 3:-http://toostep.com/ ajaykumarkhaitan/profile 4:-http://toostep.com/ ajay541kumar541khaitan/profile I am not sure what he intends to do by making multiple profiles, may be it becomes easier to report anyone abuse or something like that. This is in itself a serious issue.
By
aditya j s, Freelancer, Automobile
| 06 22 2011 23:24:15 +0000
This man Ajay Kumar Khaitan has got multiple different profiles here 1:- http://toostep.com/inventor-khaitan/profile 2:- http://toostep.com/ajay-kumar-khaitan/profile 3:-http://toostep.com/ajaykumarkhaitan/profile 4:-http://toostep.com/ajay541kumar541khaitan/profile I am not sure what he intends to do by making multiple profiles, may be it becomes easier to report anyone abuse or something like that. This is in itself a serious issue.
By
aditya j s, Freelancer, Automobile
| 06 22 2011 22:33:43 +0000
No doubt on the credentials of Mr Jawahar lal nehru,what he has done for us all,Hatts of To him.
By
VISHWA DEEPAK MISHRA, HR-Talent Acquisition Cum Business Development Manager, Leading IT Giant.
| 06 18 2011 20:43:52 +0000
Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel was extremely senior and he passed away soon in 1950, so making him the PM of India would have not been such a great idea, especially when India was at such a critical stage. At such a stage, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru as Prime Minister would make more sense.
By
Shahnawaz Islam, PR & Media Relations Manager, National Institute of Smart Governance
| 05 31 2011 07:45:05 +0000
|