jai gandhiji.....no comment and arguements...
By
Ajith Gowda, Associate System Engineer, IBM Global Services
| 01 06 2013 16:21:04 +0000
GANDHIJI OFCUORSE because if we kept on fighting on like bhagat singh we would still be under the british rule
By
Om Chatterjee, Below 10th student, Chiranjive Bharti Scholl
| 01 03 2013 06:35:41 +0000
WITH OUT GANDHI WHAT WOULD BE THE FATE OF INDIA?. IT IS ONLY BECAUSE OF HIM, HIS 'DICTATORSHIP', WE BOUST ABOUT OUR FREEDOM STRUGGLE. GODSE IS A SHAME ON OUR HERITAGE OF UNIVERSAL TOLERANCE. WHAT DOES INDIA HAS TO UPHOLD BEFORE THE WORLD, EXCEPT GANDHI?
By
Gayathri GB, Freelancer, Law
| 11 19 2012 09:05:45 +0000
Although Bhagat singh has a great impact on Indian history but at the same time Mahatma Gandhi was a true Diplomat & to run a large masses only aggressiveness is not sufficient it ll create the dispute among the peoples later on although if both worked together it would had been a great mix of Brain & effectiveness but every individual has certain self interest same with Mahatama Gandhi he never done any effort to made a mix......
By
Tejaswi Dubey, CEO, Aastha HR Solution/www.aasthahrsolutiuon.com
| 07 08 2012 14:15:17 +0000
I think the martyrdom of Bhagat Singh was never going to be enough to shake the British Empire. It was awakening of the common man by Gandhiji that really shook the edifice of the empire. But yes! I do have my doubts ( like Srinivas has ) if we should discuss the greatness of this two legendary sons of India like this. Probably we should restrict it to debating their methods. This is the least we owe it to them and other greats. We cannot shred great legacies because we as individuals are not in agreement to it.
By
Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels
| 07 08 2012 01:52:19 +0000
The Man who proved maximum during the struggle for Independence is Mahatma Gandhi. He fought using peace as the main wepon, Bhagath Singh had a different approach. Unfortunately Bhagat Singh was hanged to death at a young age, he could not participate in the struggle for freedom for a long time, but the time he was active he made revolution. Both were good in their own ways. But finally who brought result was Mahatma Gandhi. Regards, Edu Ahead, Bangalore. http://www.eduahead.com
By
Edu Head, CEO/MD/Director, Orbinet Technologies
| 07 06 2012 12:13:14 +0000
This is a nonsense question.
By
Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.
| 07 05 2012 11:04:54 +0000
I always like non-violence and he gave India Independence..Love Gandhi
By
Devanga Abhilash, MCA student, Gayatri Vidya Parishad
| 06 07 2012 17:18:35 +0000
BHAGAT SINGH
By
Tejaswi Dubey, CEO, Aastha HR Solution/www.aasthahrsolutiuon.com
| 04 14 2012 15:58:25 +0000
This is not correct to debate on great icons. Absolutely not correct.
By
Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.
| 04 13 2012 11:06:19 +0000
going bullet for bullet & bomb for bomb with the british empire would have been impactful bu would only have created a minor dent. the brits had indians in their ranks to use as cannon fodder & so were not losing much soldiers any way. it was the diplomatic coup lead by Mr. Gandhi which shamed the mighty british empire on the world stage. Mahatma Gandhi could also muster an army of gun totters & bomb poppers but the path he took has a much better impact on the empire than any all out war effort. none of the extremists lived to see freedom but Mr. Gandhi did.
By
Denny Joseph, Sr. Account Director, Noshe
| 12 28 2010 13:01:38 +0000
We have learnt a hard way in fighting for a freedom - you require all, say, left, right and centre. Its quite unassuming to say now that who will weigh more, as we would not be able to justify anything for the situation did not unfold in our presence. We would be making a blunder if we pass judgement for the history! The question would have been apt, if we asked, who would you support - Sonia Gandhi or Manmohan Singh?
By
S. Muralidharan, Executive Director, Knowledge Foundation & Campus Around the Corner
| 12 04 2010 03:39:08 +0000
Greatest and most influential personalities of all time....even Obama admires him because of his immaterialistic approach....true father of nation, with all due respect no regret for Bhagat Singh, he is a national hero which cannot be forgotten, on philosophies differ between the two......
By
Vishal Mishra, Strategic Account Planner, Dun & Bradstreet Information Services Pvt Ltd
| 11 24 2010 18:33:51 +0000
M.G. because he is the only one went to every part of india and made us to know what is freedom..
By
Nagaraj , student, sdm
| 10 05 2010 15:24:59 +0000
No one really knows much about Mahatma Gandhi. All went wrong, Division,Corruption etc given by the Congress not Gandhi. Gandhi not supported Division but Nehru did. After Nathuram Godse shot mahatma, He also realized that what he did was wrong and he misunderstood Mahatma Gandhi
By
Bishwajeet Banerjee, B.B.A student, Birla Institute Of Technology, (BIT), Ranchi
| 08 05 2010 15:20:36 +0000
Why this separation Dear ? Both are Indian so don't make groups on account of History as it is not good for our unity.
By
SHRIKANT MANOHAR DANKE, Project Manager, Phadnis Infrastructur Ltd
| 08 05 2010 14:59:51 +0000
hey dear....itzz gud u support bhagat singh...i do respect him.....bt atleast do nt say Mahatma Gandhi a jealous pimp.....
By
shantanu shukla, systems engineer, Infosys Technologies
| 03 25 2010 18:14:13 +0000
It needs a lot of courage to support or even to follow Gandhiji. Many of the martyrs who followed Gandhiji were ordinary people like us. One of them was Matangini Hazra who being a widow led the non-violence march in her area and was killed by the British bullets. I gave her example to explain that not only Nehru or other Indian leaders supported Gantdhiji but the ordinary people who mostly bore the brunt of the British also supported him with their hearts for his ideals. This ideals are uniform and it will be as long as our civilization is there in this earth. With the unrest in most parts of the world and maiming becaming a part of our life we should embrace the ideals of non-violence and seek peace for the entire world
By
sanjay dey, Tax & accounting , Consultatnt
| 11 23 2009 07:22:02 +0000
My support is always to Gandhi. But at the same time there is a mis-concept on Bhagat Singh. Bhagat Singh no doubt was involved in violent protest in his initial stage. But he is quick to realise the non-violence method. He threw a bomb in to an empty space of assembly (intensionally not to kill anybody). he surrendered despite he is armed. He fought for freedom in the courtroom through debate. He might be convicted for a crime he did during his initial stage but his greatness & patriotism is more enlighted due to his non-violent movement at the latter stage. Thus Bhagat Singh also a follower of Gandhian philosophy. Gandhi in fact abandoned by Congress & India as early as 1946. Thus the present chaos are due to ignoring Gandhian thoughts. It is time to follow Gandhi thoughts to achieve true freedom.
By
Biranchi Narayan Acharya, Chief Manager (Projects), Simplex Infrastructures Ltd
| 10 27 2009 06:26:01 +0000
Before British aquired India, we were divided into small kingdoms and because of our division and strong desire to defeat the neighbouring kingdom we allowed british people to conquer both the kingdoms. by Bhagatsinghs way same situation would have arised after independence.Gandhiji has tried a lot to bring harmony in diversity. The common man in India was not armed with quality of weapons british army was having. Even britsh army was having lot of native people so a war against british would have been a war against native army itself. so a division at the base itself. Because of non-violance even native British employees could internally support Gandhiji. I agree by Bhgatsing's way freedom could have achieved much earlier but again we would have been fighting with each other even today. The aim of British was to buy cheap raw material from india and sell Finished products in india as well outside world by manufacturing in england. Gandhiji attacked exactly at this vital point by using swadeshi and British Govt. realised that expenditure on ruling India is more than revenue. When the main purpose was defeated they have no otherway than quiting India.
By
Raja S Patil, CEO/MD/Director, self employeed
| 10 21 2009 02:26:11 +0000
Non violence of course Supporters on the other side ,pls try out Bhagat singhs policy in your every day life whenever situation arises and see the result....It will be more violence and chaos....violence has never brought an amicable end result . Anyone who takes up a sword/gun dies by it.
By
Charles davison, Project Manager, Douglas OHI LLC
| 10 02 2009 11:48:01 +0000
i will go always MAHATMA GANDHI ,bcoz i m not talking who is right or wrong way.i see only which path or logic success.so MAHATMA GANDHI is success for freedom,non -violence method is right.my opinion is small process always impact deep .violence is very easy way .and every one go with is way,nobody like tuffest path like non-violance.so i will say go with success mantra means MAHATMA GANDHI
By
S.KUMAR , BD CONSULTANT, CONFIDANTIAL
| 10 02 2009 09:47:30 +0000
I will always support non-violence
By
Ramakrishna Perumal, Electrical Specialist Engineer,
| 10 02 2009 08:23:23 +0000
|
Tit for Tat is the best Answer to the enemies, Bhagat singh has done right at that time, Peace is not only the solution always, example today our enemies occupied most of the region in kashmir, if we supposed to watch and chanting like shanti(peace)...shanti... on tomorrow they will say Delhi is my land. so my friends DARING is the Right weapon like BHAGAT SINGH.... I favor to BS and Gandhi both, But i hate gandhiji principles
By
Praveen Hashlay, Software Developer, RI
| 03 11 2013 10:05:21 +0000
Speaking against anyof them would be matter of disrespect to the work done by these real men for our country. But when speaking between these i would go with Bhagat Singh as alone non voilance would have not brought us across the river.
By
SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, Senior Software Testing Engineer, HCL Tech ,
| 03 06 2013 10:18:48 +0000
The biggest mistake Indian people do is they are under estimating contribution Given by Indian Revolutionaries.People forgets that in 1947 British agreed to hand over the charge after Indian Soldiers took over a one warship named Talwar.
By
Sachin Patil, Executive Operations, Mahindra
| 07 19 2012 14:52:31 +0000
the others who gave their lives were who then?? shut your mouth dude...shut ur crap
By
yuvraj jain Kuhar, B.Com student, st.xavier's college
| 07 19 2012 13:23:43 +0000
the others who gave their lives were who then?? shut your mouth dude...shut ur crap
By
yuvraj jain Kuhar, B.Com student, st.xavier's college
| 07 19 2012 13:21:33 +0000
a man at the age fo 23 did it. He shook the British Empire at one shot.Even our bapu(sarcastically) was scared of his rising popularity.COME on!! at 23 i and many young guns like me would love staring at beauties around. he was different .. his words to the judges during th trials and his leadership qualities were more than worthy of being praised. Had we attained freedom through his ways.. i bet we would have been a completely different nation today. gadhi was a shrewd man and will always be considered so atleast till i am alive.
By
yuvraj jain Kuhar, B.Com student, st.xavier's college
| 07 19 2012 13:18:32 +0000
Well Bhagat Singh was the one who waked up nation with his martyrdom...He was the one who teached our nation how to fight for our rights...
By
Gurpreet Singh, Team Associate, BA Continuum Solutions
| 07 07 2012 04:46:49 +0000
He was right congress just want to stay in politics. ..they doesnt want to do any thing for people. ...this nehru family is very clever, they used gandhi and even they are againt bhagat singh but they also use his deayh...bloody congress...
By
Abhi Bhardwaj, Pursuing Graduation student, Delhi Public School
| 07 05 2012 08:16:11 +0000
because what he said at the time he was fighting about congress - India is going through with the exact same phase...
By
Sahil Mehan, manager, Dell International Services
| 04 13 2012 04:02:41 +0000
I happen to stumble on this question and definitely had to respond to it. Theres no second thought that the legend Bhagat Singh is greater that Gandhi. Yaar at an young age of 21 he sacrificed his life for the nation, he made British to take note of him and the seriousness of the indian independence struggle. Even Gandhi was afraid of the growing popularity of Bhagat singh. Bhaghat was pure at heart and did not play politics like what Ghandi did. Ghadhi didn't even attempt properly to save Bhaghat from the gallow. Its a pity that We do not celebrate the martyrs day as we celebrate the great Ghandi jayanti... Bhagat, Sukhdev, Azad, Subhas Chandra Bose and many many more have fought for our freedom. Our freedom is as a combined result of all these struggle and pleeeease not just because someone went on a satyagraha or took an ahimsa route. Just to add to it, it was Bhagat singh who demanded for full freedom. Ghandi was till then talking about dominion status. Where in we would still be under the control of British.
By
Humming Bird, Designing. Advertising. Business Identity. Print Production
| 01 22 2011 18:02:00 +0000
GUYS THINK FOR 2 MINUTES IF MAHATMA GANDHI WAS ALIVE WHEN 1971 AND KARGIL WAR HAPPENED, THEN DID U THINK THAT WE WILL WON THOSE WAR BY FOLLOWING GREAT GANDHI'S PATH i.e. NON-VIOLENCE. ANS YES, I DON'T HOPE THIS ANS BY YOUTH. AND IF NO. THEN TELL ME WHAT U GIVE NAME TO NATHURAM GODASE AS TERRORIST OR FREEDOM FIGHTER WITH VIOLENCE. B'COZ I THINK EVERYTHING HAVE LIMIT. BEYOND IT, IT BECOMES DANGEROUS FOR SOCIETY, HUMAN, HUMANITY FOR NATION ALSO. AND I THINK THAT DANGEROUS THING IS ENDED ONLY B'COZ OF NATHURAM GODASE. I DON'T HAVE ANY DOUBT ABT GREAT GANDHI AS FREEDOM FIGHTER. BUT HIS PATH IS NOT RIGHT AT EVERY TIME, EVERY WHERE. IF HE MODIFY HIS STATEMENT THAT GO THROUGH FIRSTLY NON-VIOLENCE AND THEN VIOLENCE IF CENT PERCEPTIBLY NEEDED. IF ANYONE HURT BY MY VIEW, PLEASE EXCUSE ME. BUT I THINK EVERY ONE HAS TO THINK BY DIFFERENT WAY ALSO. NOW SO MUCH TERRORISM INCREASES AND WE DECIDED TO FINISH IT BY NON-VIOLENCE THEN FIRSTLY THOSE PEOPLE FINISH WHO THINK LIKE THAT AND NOT ANY OTHER PERSON, THAT ONE BE TERRORIST. ONE MORE THINK I HAVE ADD IN THIS, THERE IS NO COMMUNITY, RELIGION, CASTE, COUNTRY OR CULTURE WHO TEACH HOW TO BECOME TERRORIST.
By
KIRAN BHOR, Accounts Assist./Accountant, Country Club (I) Ltd.
| 12 28 2010 09:16:12 +0000
It took so many years with the thinking of Mahatma Gandhi....if it would be not Bhagat Singh then the British Raj would never have shaken and not felt that threat from Indians...He actually showed the British raj that Indians have power to overdo anything...With all respect to MK Gandhi..He had the chance to save Bhagat Singh but he didnt..N the reason is still out there!!!
By
Gaurav Mehta, Development Chemist, Church & Dwight, UK Ltd
| 12 03 2010 20:19:41 +0000
No commnets on him. he is great person. without any selfishness he done all the things for contry. others are just fake
By
Yogita Jaywant Patil, Associate consultant, Datamatics (CDIS)
| 11 24 2010 14:53:35 +0000
People out of there mind supports Gandhi. Gandhi believed that COMPROMISE is the only key to success, and due to him only we r suffering till now.
By
Nishant Sharma, B.Tech. student, Anand Engineering College
| 11 24 2010 12:56:35 +0000
this is the correct view .....if this could have been the case in those years,,today these blood sucking animal called as Congress wouldn't have governing us ,,,...i wish i go back in history and tell people to follow Bhagat singh and men's and call him as the real Mahatma and father of nation....
By
Santosh A. Jadhav, Sr. Officer Sales
| 10 05 2010 12:14:24 +0000
of course Bhagat singh.... no second thought,, Hinsa against Britishers was the correct tool to be used .
By
Santosh A. Jadhav, Sr. Officer Sales
| 10 05 2010 12:09:48 +0000
Bhagat Singh is true Indian hero... yahi wo inshaan hai jisne AZAADI ke sahi maine samjhaye aur desh me wo josh ka sanchar kiya jisse angrej sarkar puri tarah hil gayi... Gandhi ji ko laga agar ye jinda raha to sara credit ye le jayega karke unko faansi hone se nahi roka jabki unke pass mauka tha ki unko wo bacha sakte the, Gandhi ji ne apane swaarth ke liye is naujawaan ko faansi chadne se nahi bachaya..... Bhagat singh ne pure desh ke logo ke khoon me garmi bhar dii jisse aazaadi ki raah aasaan ho gayi... He is the true Indian Idol !!
By
Nohar Singh Dhruv, Jr. Engg, Chhatisgarh State Electrical Board
| 08 05 2010 17:08:19 +0000
It goes without saying that Sardar Bhagat sing was a true leader and real martyr,in fact true father of nation.Mohandas k Gandhi a treacherous,jealous pimp......
By
DEEPAK SHARMA, International IT and ITes sales,Business Acquisition, Account Management, Relationship Management, Safaltek Software Pvt. Ltd.
| 03 25 2010 17:39:25 +0000
BHAGAT SINGH FOR COMPLETE FREEDOM(MOOL SWARAJ)
By
BHARAT KUMAR ANYAW, Construction-Construction Management, SARVODAYA GROUP
| 12 05 2009 13:17:08 +0000
HE DIES FOR COUNTRY DURING FREEDOM STRUGLE AT YOUNG AGE. MAHATMA GANDHI PREACHE AHIMSA AND HE CANNOT STOP PARTISIAM AND DISMANTLE OF INDIAN CONGRESS THAT LED TO HIS ASSISINSATION
By
pvvaidhyanathaqn , ASSISTANT MANAGER FINANCE, RAMIND COLD FORGE PRIVATE LIMITED
| 11 23 2009 11:01:40 +0000
While a lot of grassroots workers of the Congress gave up their lives for the sake of the country, ultimately it was the surviving top brass that got the power. And power is addictive. We do not know how many Congressmen, if any, actually were hanged by the Britishers. Perhaps because they were mild, they were not seeking an abrupt freedom from the Raj. It takes a lot to lead the people peacefully and it also takes a lot more to give up one's life for the cause. The real people who fought for freedom mostly gave their lives up and the survivors became ministers after independence. I would side with neither Gandhi nor Bhagat Singh. Both were extremes in their ways. But if you look at sacrifice, Bhagat's was much greater. He did not seek either recognition, fame, following etc. He could have easily changed his path to "ahimsa" , apologized to the British and lived long enough to become a Cabinet Minister after the Independence. However, he didn't care for his life : such spirit of sacrifice is rare.
By
Shyam S, Project Leader/Managing Consultant, A leading EDA firm
| 11 23 2009 07:49:59 +0000
Gandhiji and Bhagat singh have hell and heaven difference. Gandhiji is more famous because he got political popularity because of Congress. Freedom fighters like Bhagat singh didn't get that that doesn't mean they were not good. Rather, i would say, revolutionaries like them shook the British empire from its roots. Not the Non-violence. I am not saying Non-violence is bad. But we should according to time,place and circumstances. I like Gandhiji till 1935 not after that. He could have saved life of many revolutionaries including Bhagat and Udham singh but he didn't rather declared Udham singh as "MAD" !!! After Lala lajpat rai died, it was Bhagat singh and hi men who took the revenge. Rest all were just abusing British government. Thats it. They were good speakers and Revolutionaries were the real Actors....
By
Sarika Singh, Assistant Professor, BIT
| 10 03 2009 05:09:44 +0000
i dnt think it wd b a tough ques for todays india and indians!becoz today if u want to survive u need to be harsh,you should be aware of your right n if it is not accoladed to u then just go ahead n snatch it!!!its not a time to be patient n tolerate everything becoz today we have much more gruesome peoples rather than the britishers!!!!could u handle AL ZAZIRA or QUIDA with non voilence,every smart answer will be no n if yours is yes then congratulation you are the newborn 21st century MAHATMA!!!!!!!
By
shashi shekhar mishra, Engineer
| 10 03 2009 03:35:35 +0000
It is tough & too difficult question to answer for me. I am totally answerless but I will try to answer the same. Britishers ruled in India for many years & beat people for many years & there is a same contribution of both the leader to give freedom to India. One who accept way of silence & non-violence & another who accepted way of TIT FOR TAT. But more or less I will support Bhagat singh because todays generation lives for TIT FOR TAT.
By
prakashraj kumavat, MBA/PGDM student, Omegan School of Business (ICFAI Tripura)
| 10 02 2009 08:00:11 +0000
|
