Why the difference in treatent for VIP's theft and that of ordinary man's ?

technically speaking no.but as you said because of the power and money people get a different treatment not only in the open market but also in jails. This is mainly because corruptions, flaws in laws, no one to question etc.

Principle y, I can say ,"No". Because, before law everyone is ,"Equal".But to maintain global systemic element, at times - but to say many a times, we adopt this kind of disparity. Can we say judicial knack or loop-hole?. Say, when we carry out cost-benefit analysis of the VIP, it warrants to effect a disparity in dealing. This is not for the individual but for the system as a whole. But, VIP, takes advantage of it.

The constitution maker never visualized for discrimination of individual based on his role and profile in the society. More equal treatment of VIPs is necessarily a legacy from colonial era.

Because of the money power and political power they have better treatment despite they have committed wrong deeds.

Thanks for referring Mr.Manoj kumar.

theoretically speaking there should not be any difference in treating the guilty.but,might will win fight.a positive consensus in judiciary may change the system.

Is there any basis in the Indian law to segregate the theifs or murderes from ordinary man with VVIPs or VIPs. Really till now I couldnt understand why a person like Satyam raju who had done corruptions for crores for rupees getting 5 star facilities and others are getting harsher punishment from the moment they are getting caught from the policeman. What is your say on this.