Whether they work after they join school or not they need support of parents. Until they become capable of dealing external pressure by themselves, They need someone to really support them. In this world we r hearing many cases of kids gone the bad way due to unavailability of parents when needed.
By
Raghava Phanindra, Data Analyst, confidential
| 03 09 2012 06:31:10 +0000
For the sake of arguing we can say NO to your topic. But it is a fact that to some extend it affects the children when the mother is away from the child in the early stage. Afterall, no house maid replace the care and love of Mother. Regards, Anna George. Web Analyst. Nichepro Technologies. Bangalore. http://www.nichesuite.com
By
Anna George, Web Analyst, NichePro Consulting LLC
| 03 08 2012 05:17:45 +0000
no not at all,child needs morthe only some perticuler period,now a days school almost full days , mother at home when they went n back from work when child will come. so i dont think child suffers harm as their working mom.
By
NISHA , Accounts Executive/Accountant, pratik properties
| 09 24 2011 09:40:23 +0000
Very controversial topic indeed. I love it! First things first: GOOD mothers are wonderful! I disagree with Shilpa. Mothers need not "sit at home". Mothers can even work from home, over the Internet even. They can prepare tests for their kids and coach them at home themselves. There's no need to send kids to high priced schools when & especially IF the mother is a graduate at least. MY mother taught me ALL of my subjects till the 7th standard, after which, it was I who wanted to go it on my own - and I could because of the foundation SHE gave me. If the mother BEING AN ADULT cannot read and understand the lessons so that she can guide her children's education, how can she expect her kids to understand the stuff? And if most mothers are so loving, MOST of the schools would be community schools where the schools are run by the mothers and the children are taught by the mothers. A lot of women cry and make a huge fuss and such women are ready to "defend" womanhood, motherhood, etc. BUT... Are they ready to co-operate with each other - at least for the sake of the children? Co-operate, eh, never in a million years. If such were the case, dowry harassment would never occur. And about the "bondage" ("bond", actually, Parimala) between mother and child: There are many mothers who don't care enough for their kids. For many of these women, it could either be post-partum depression or such hormone-balance-related disorder OR they really just don't care (excuses and reasons could be many). A simple example: I've seen mothers walking on the road with their children on the side of the traffic. What if some vehicle hits the kid(s)? Oh, I could rave and rant on this topic in thousands of words but I think I've conveyed the picture, eh? :D
By
Isaac Madhavan, R & D Manager, Test prep company
| 09 23 2011 15:43:44 +0000
I do agree with this arguement. My wife was working and so was i. Then we found that my son's growth was utterly misreable inspite of the fact that we were monitoring his health. So when a job change occured, a few months later we reasoned that one of us should take care of our kid. And in 6 months the magic was there for all to see. He is so healthy that people are jealous. Secret is that mothers care and fathers love are essential for the better halth of one's kid. So all you working women, if it is not paying or you can forego with the pay and survive on yur hubby's check, please do not hesistate, just got for it and get to your child, he needs you more than the money you would earn. We have made sacrifies but are mentally so happy that our son is coming up so well, that it makes all the efforts, sacrifices worth it.
By
AMISH , Writer - Administrator
| 09 23 2011 12:18:16 +0000
Psychologically, YES, otherwise not! Mother is the Living Goddess of every child! Children are hurt when they deserve better care, but due to paucity of time, they are ignored by the working mothers!
By
S. Muralidharan, Executive Director, Knowledge Foundation & Campus Around the Corner
| 03 02 2011 14:46:12 +0000
Children need mothers not only for care batter but also for naurturing their child, developing value in their child, teaching them ethics and so on
By
Nem Singh, Consultant, Consultancy Firm
| 01 19 2011 06:46:20 +0000
relationship between mother and child is unique and cant be changed if we thing in one way .like in all animal community mother has to take care of child till certin age so that it is self suuficient to deal with internal and external trends .child is like a small tender sampling that needs parental shadow and care till its grows to understand self.so a mother will sure harm a child by depriving its intimacy right with mother,care, companionship love and time .which are non tangable but essential to a childs growth when amercan country gives 5 years of maternal leave (i read but not sure)why cant indian mothers spare 3- 4 years with growing children ofcourse its a enjoyable experience then to blame it
By
dr venugopal ys, dentist, srinivas dental clinic
| 01 14 2011 07:49:30 +0000
Absolutely right.All the working women think that there are somebody(MIL ,servant..) to take care of their child.A child need mother careness at the young age.
By
vimal , Sr.voip engg
| 01 14 2011 05:59:22 +0000
I agree with Sivaramakrishnan.
By
pushpakumari.pariyarath , Freelancer, Textile
| 09 30 2010 06:32:46 +0000
Nowdays u cna see that lot of mothers are employable they have no time to take care their children,they often harm the child due their strees in job ,they have no balanced mind for their home as well as their job
By
Sivaramakrishnan , Trainee, First Planet Technology
| 06 26 2010 15:32:59 +0000
It will not harm if some one is there in that house nearer & dearer who can take care as the child need actually. Otherwise the many examples there in the society.
By
Mr Khirod Gogoi, Project Lead, Resigned from Global Innovosource Ltd. last year (Sep/2008)
| 06 23 2010 11:19:23 +0000
yes
By
sdiri mohamed, Analyst, Ministry of industry and technologie
| 06 23 2010 10:35:22 +0000
working women harmfully effected the child life the behaviour of a child is creating on the age 3 month from 7 year natuarly the child and mom have a chemistry with a god wish the working mother cannot contribute her self fully to the child it causes that to broke the chemistry between them it also causes the natuer and charactor of the child in future if any working women here can say what the speciality of a boy charactor in the age of 4-7 as well as 7-12
By
shan , Business Analyst, Huwaiteen
| 06 23 2010 09:11:31 +0000
Human is a social animal. he/she needs fellow human support for existence. Only mother can teach the child how to be good fellow human to survive in this world. In this corporate world we expect people to be a best team player,likely the he/she should be fellow human being. working mother can bring only money to the family,not the values to their child. i won't say it is only mother's duty. even father play's major role. but percentage is less.
By
Senthilkumar Palanichamy, Business and Functional Analyst, Hardwin Software solutions Pvt Ltd.
| 06 14 2010 14:42:17 +0000
yes, the children of working mothers are not as like as of housewives because a mother is the first & Original teacher for her child and if a child miss its guidence, his loss would never be compensated...
By
Harminder Singh, Quality Assurance Officer, Jagatjit Industries Limited
| 06 10 2010 16:04:57 +0000
Yes working women harms child. surely with very less exceptions. How much time do u devoted towards towarsd your kids after doing office & homework, and even if u spare some time than what will be the potential of that time? Mostly working women do take leave to teach there child during there exam period only. is this help?
By
Rajesh Jain, Pharmaceuticals Mfg.
| 06 10 2010 15:00:59 +0000
There is not even an ioata of doubt in that statement. Ever since woman started working I don't really know what good happened to country per se but there is utter chaos prevailing in the society. Just go back to 50s and 60s and 70s, compare the children of those mothers against the ones in 80s, 90s and latest you find stalrking difference almost in every aspect. While the former lot offers solidity and stability the latter lot offers whimsical behaviour. To state few examples the no. of attacks on women uptp 1980 were very very few and there was hardly any acid attack on women, leave alone dowry deaths. But now? One might argue that purchasing power of a family must have gone up because of dual employment but look at the effect it has on children and their sensitivities. Unfortunately we have not tried to quantify the effects in terms of sensivities and responsibilities. When a woman goes for work so many aspects of a family rearing goes for a toss.
By
T Hanumantha Rao, Mentor, Macher TechnoConsults
| 06 10 2010 11:22:38 +0000
the world is not the same as it use to be and all parents today work for a living be it mum or dad and if the child is too dependent on either parent for anything in particular, it turns out detrimental for the child's future. Independence is an art that all children must be nurtured with from as early as possible.
By
Akbar Namazi, Director on Board, Master Plan
| 06 10 2010 04:38:55 +0000
yes it makes difference. i am not agreed with shilpa. the explanation given by her is not for full time working, it could be a part time job which ends with the school time. mother at home can take care of her child properly, but if working mother manage it properly with proper understanding with her child then the gap can be much lesser.
By
sanjay kumar mangal, IT , TATA Group Co.
| 06 09 2010 15:58:35 +0000
Shilpa is correct in some extent, but mother's care for a child till high school going,improves his/her views on social culture, relations etc.Mother can join a job after that, then no problem.
By
R N Bhattacharyya, Freelancer, Freelancer
| 06 09 2010 15:56:12 +0000
thanks Shilpa for referal.i agree to the point of debate but also i think u r right in ur arguement part.anyhow mother care is very much important for any child as nothing in this world can substitute MOTHER in any means.
By
jairaj shyam prasad, Production Manager, BOSCH Ltd
| 06 09 2010 15:01:24 +0000
Yes, I tend to support you under the threat of being branded as an M.C.P., :-)
By
M. Prabhakar Rao, Green Consultant: Green Buildings, LEED Certifications, GreenGuard, Energy Star, GreenCo Certifications, Energy Audits
| 06 09 2010 14:51:01 +0000
No study and no survey is required. It is the commonsense that will speak : "Yes, in early child-hood, absence of mother/ somebody mother-like may affect the natural mental growth of a child". Essentially, mothers may require to work, full or part-time. But that is 'another story'. Happy debating, mainly from working mothers.
By
ASOKE KUSARI, Domestic Private Banking-Executive/Manager, A large leading PSU Bank - India
| 06 09 2010 13:59:33 +0000
The longest infant hood and child hood is only for human. He/she will enter to the teen only at the age of thirteen when puberty starts . This is the period a child form his/her character and gain education of his culture and responsibility on the earth. He/she need full support and protection of the parents through mother to build his personality without being abused. An un-abused child only can be a confident citizen. My opinion is not only through his childhood, but at least two years of his/her teen should grow with full time supervision and support of his mother.
By
George Varghese, Proprietor, Jecyees
| 06 09 2010 11:06:36 +0000
Yes,
By
V kumar, Manager- Formulations, A Leading pharma company
| 06 08 2010 12:07:34 +0000
|
I absolutely agree with Shilpa. A mother will always be a mother. The meaning of the word mother won't change if she starts working. She will always show love and care towards her child even if she is working. It depends on a mother that how she balances both her business as well as her house.A mother can never harm her children.
By
Rimsha Tanaaz, 11th student, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute Of Technology, Hyderabad
| 03 05 2012 12:27:47 +0000
Why children are to be cared by only mother ! When one mother is working lady then certainly her husband is also working male and so children are to be brought up by both.
By
R N Bhattacharyya, Freelancer, Freelancer
| 09 26 2011 08:54:07 +0000
i agree with Shilpa. Mother's care is required only up to a certain age
By
sheriff r mohideen, planning manager- engineering dept, FMG limited
| 09 25 2011 15:24:17 +0000
no, not at all, its depend upon individual perception but according to me its not that we see.I also have working mother and she maintains gud balance between office and home responsibility.I will definitely oppose it.
By
pragati parihar, MBA/PGDM student, banasthali university,jaipur
| 09 24 2011 14:39:25 +0000
Mr.Isaac Madhavan as u told about ur'self that your mother taught u till 7th std, then u were on ur own, now plz tell me ,what she was doing in her free time ............ what is happening with her knowledge ?????????? watching TV, chatting with friends or reading books to enhance knowledge........ when u had such a dedicated mother .don't you think she could have been a good working women also........who could have given her contribution to society... main thing here is how well a women can cope up with work and home??????? so u can't blame all working women for that. Mother will be always mother.plz sit and talk to her and find out what she felt for those few yrs now she would have found something to keep herself busy. As u have given one simple example I will give u life threatening example which to day’s women are facing even after performing their duties. A women stayed back for her family without working and she had big and rich family. Even after professionally qualified both husband and wife .she relayed on her husband and the loving family which she had around her. For near 17 yrs sitting at home never in her dreams also she thought that fate will turn its back. Her husband expired and for her shock husband had left 7 lakhs debt on her head when she approached everyone their she got nothing, here which came to her help was she was professionally qualified and took her friend’s help, sold her jewellary and started her carrier with no confidence………… The age limit and experience will count to get a job………………………and does a person know advance software can she cope up with computer????????? All this matter ……………… Debt and son’s education and loosing house ………….threatened her so much…………… She worked day and night completely, forgot the responsibility to take care of her son…… Now she completed her debt and returned to her son the only ambition left with her is watching her son becoming capable person……….he lost few yrs lack of love and affection when it was needed for him in abundance………… Now she say’s ,if I would have worked ,at least part time also …..i would have never faced the situation…………. So facing extreme situation is not the answer ,be in touch with outer world and the awareness will be more when u work.
By
parimala.c.wagh , Tech Architect, freelance
| 09 24 2011 06:39:25 +0000
I agree with Shilpa Yadav. It depends on how the mother could able to cope with the two important responsibilities. By nature father cant fill the role of a mother. They are working to lead more comfortable life, but it should not be at the cost of the future of their own kids. Mother can take the responsibilities of the father, but father cant play the role of a mother successfully.
By
Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.
| 09 24 2011 05:54:22 +0000
I don't think that a working mother harms the children. I know children whose both parents are working and are brought up servants who has done exceedingly well. In fact such children are more affectionate to other people and have better understanding of life.
By
Shashi Kumar U, Manager accounts & commercial, Mazda Concrete Products Pvt Ltd
| 09 24 2011 05:53:40 +0000
I would say that it totally depend on a mother,how she's coping up with her work and family. Mother is a mother,whether she's working or not she'll take care of her kids. "Mothers are great".
By
VISHWA DEEPAK MISHRA, HR-Talent Acquisition Cum Business Development Manager, Leading IT Giant.
| 09 24 2011 05:17:40 +0000
Writing about mother and child bondage b’cos how much ever we become modern, the sole to sole connection is unexplainable. Mother is a pure sole which doesn’t have any barriers weather rich or poor, working or not working. The transformation happens with in oneself, an unexplainable emotion & feeling, physically, mentally Happen with in a woman who is pregnant. The bondage doesn’t begin after birth; it starts before, when the feeling comes within, the soul is growing inside. How can a Mother harm her own children?????????????????? She takes rebirth with every newborn which she brings to this world. If the sense of mother teaching her children to lead them to good path is known as harm. Do not blame her, if the children turn to bad humans. “An overly pampered child will turn to become irresponsible person. An unnecessarily strict mother exceeding the explainable limits will make her child sadist. Give them space and freedom, listen to them what they want to say and object where they r wrong and make them understand, where they r wrong to make them a good citizen. Every mother’s know this fact…………one should never make this statement when ,one who does not understand the bondage between mother and child.
By
parimala.c.wagh , Tech Architect, freelance
| 09 23 2011 11:44:34 +0000
no
By
anuradha , NECC Ltd.
| 03 03 2011 03:37:06 +0000
It doesn't matter whether mother is working or home maker what matter how much quality time both parents give to their children. Role of father is as important as of mother.
By
Danish khan, Business Analyst, cognizant business consultancy
| 03 02 2011 18:03:47 +0000
I don't think so. It is the quality time which matters.
By
anuradha , NECC Ltd.
| 03 02 2011 16:18:20 +0000
Every mother never even think of harming her child & in spite of her busy work schedule she is the person @ 1 st place to look after her child's food, education & other necessary things. So, I strongly oppose to other side.
By
SHRIKANT MANOHAR DANKE, Project Manager, Phadnis Infrastructur Ltd
| 03 02 2011 12:53:59 +0000
this is a totally biased and myopic view. my grandmother was a teacher, so was my mother, and so were my earlier generations and they produced kids who were par excellence in studies, games, etc. I am an army officer, recipient of international awards in civil industry too. me and my siblings are state level and national level athletes, ....i see no harm in working mothers as long as they ensure that they have their eyes on their kids activities and their caretakers background/ activities
By
Leander , Corporate - Risk Management, Business Continuity, Security, FSL
| 02 27 2011 13:48:46 +0000
shilpa ji you are correct and i think batter care to your child and agree with your view but how much cases like that
By
Nem Singh, Consultant, Consultancy Firm
| 01 19 2011 06:51:28 +0000
The environment in which the child grows is important. Also, the values that are added by the parents to the child's behavior and culture. Work or no work - these are the essential elements
By
Hari Prasad K, Head - Managed Services & IT Solutions
| 01 14 2011 06:32:42 +0000
Being a mother of 1 yr old and working i dont' think there's anything wrong with working as long as the baby's needs are taken care of. I have my mom who looks after her and i take her home once im back home. Its actually good in a way that we are able to take better care of her needs in terms of investments for future. Also i value every moment i get to spend with my baby.
By
Deepika , Merchandiser, Levi Strauss & Co.
| 07 01 2010 07:31:50 +0000
THE ONUS CAN NOT BE EXCLUSIVELY ON WORKING MOTHERS.OWING TO THEIR PREOCCUPATIONS,STRESS,OFFICIAL COMMITMENTS,TRAVEL,ETC THEY FIND VERY LITTLE TIME TO BE PRODUCTIVELY SPENT WITH THEIR OFF SPRINGS.THOUGH THEY LONG TO.THE UNFORTUNATE SITUATION PREVAILING TODAY IS NUCLEAR FAMILIES,WITHOUT ANY ELDER MEMBER OF THE FAMILY STAYING TOGETHER TO TAKE CARE OF GROWING CHILDREN,WHO ARE LEFT IN THE LURCH.THE LUCKY ONES WITH THEIR GRAND PARENT/S STAYING WITH THEM ARE BROUGHT UP RIGHT.
By
s.baalu , Consultant, XYZ LTD
| 06 26 2010 14:15:57 +0000
a behaviour of child 90% depends on the parents and 10% from society the child is exposed to. so working mother donot harm child in any respect. a child will learn what mother fed to him/her.
By
abhishek paul, Designer Trainee, pennar industries ltd., patancheru, medak dist., hyderabad
| 06 23 2010 06:33:29 +0000
A child needs mothers care even at the age of 18 so a mother responsibility doesnt end at the age of 3 and same for the fathers. Neglecting personal life in lieu of Profession is not a good IDEA!
By
Aamir Quraishi, Exceedous International
| 06 11 2010 15:20:51 +0000
There Can Be Little Ignorance About The Child's Upbringing But As A Whole It Would Be False To Derive A Meaning Of Harming A Child If Mothers Work. Because Such Families Take Care To Find A Best Alternative To A Mother During Working Hours. The More Harm Is To Her Husband If She Stays Home !!!
By
suhaschandra deshpande, Marketing Associate
| 06 10 2010 22:36:40 +0000
Yes you are right as per your argument Ms.Shilpa Yadav. But 20% it is harmful that relates to children joining with others in the absence of mothers.
By
NATTERAJA R. ARIKRISHNAN, GM-Projects, Bentec Electricals & Electronics Pvt. Ltd
| 06 10 2010 17:50:10 +0000
NO I DO NOT AGREE I think that working mothers do educate their kids better. My reasoning is that working women get to go out a lot, tend to have a lot more experience and be independent. I personally believe that since my mom was a working one, I have grown up to be more independent and mroe career oriented. Thanks Maa for everything... >>>LIVE AND LET LIVE<
By
mula santhoshreddy, HR Executive, MINDS INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS
| 06 10 2010 06:20:48 +0000
I am in agreement with Shilpa on the subject. At the same time if a nanny is being hired that will be great. The child misses mostly mothers at a young age there after it must be made certain that the child should not fall in bad company so a nanny. The shorter the gap in meeting the mother is actually better. In case of survey done if the same is done under this circumstances then the finding will be probably different.
By
Rathin Deb, Advisor and retail consultant, currently as Branch Manager, Tower Infotech Ltd
| 06 10 2010 05:48:46 +0000
for the childrens school ,college results no mother or father is responsible,After all the results depends on the study of that child.parents are devoting their time up to certain age.
By
gajanan D. nakate, (Legal Officer, Pharma (B.pharm LLB )
| 06 10 2010 04:53:03 +0000
We have to find out time to spend with children. That is the only thing. When you are getting sufficient time, what is wrong in working. By working you are contributing to the society for its devolopment.
By
Binu Paul, Mechanical Engineer-Fire Protection, Doosan Heavy Industries & Constructions
| 06 10 2010 04:50:16 +0000
I don't think any mother will harm children. In the present day life a working mother will certainly have good educational back ground hence she will understand the child better and will be in a position to give better quality of life to the child. The economical freedom of working mothers will be an added advantage.
By
Shashi Kumar U, Manager accounts & commercial, Mazda Concrete Products Pvt Ltd
| 06 10 2010 04:31:10 +0000
Well the short answer is no. No mother will ever harm her child. Why it is always mother who have to take care of the child. Why can't dad do it? Agreed that for first few years the child needs the mother full time based on the advise by the doctors " mother milk is the best". But then for those dads who are worried about the health of the child might consider taking parental leave and stay at home. Having said that, it is better for the development of the child / toddler aged 2+ to have a minimum of at least 2- 3 years of coginative development in a child care. Isn't that the opportunity for them to play also and if the mother is working till late we have extended day cares. But hey then again dad can always pick the child early. Why me.....why only the mother
By
P.P.Boni , McConnell Dowell ( Tunnel & Underground),
| 06 10 2010 04:22:31 +0000
I don't agree with this. What is needed is how she spends the time with the kid when she is available, how she takes care of it and what she teaches it. And a mother can never harm a kid. My mother too used to work. But apart from the 8 hrs at work, she used to spend the rest 16 hrs with me and whatever I have learnt is from her and I believe she hasn't harmed me. Of course she will need the support of the elders in the family and she will have to work a bit harder. But mothers anyway do that.
By
Arun , Business Analyst, Infrasoft Technologies Limited
| 06 09 2010 17:52:26 +0000
Various studies infer results which may or may not contradict the general trend. A child is exposed to various stimuli from birth and as the child grows it needs to be guided along its path so that it can imbibe good values and learn to discriminate between good and bad values. This can be achieved by the guidance of either parent and whether the parent is working or not working. The key is the time spent with the child in order to shape the future of the child. It is possible that if the parent is not working, the child may still not imbibe good values, if the time spent by the parent with the child is very little. However, when the parents are working full-time, it is difficult to spend quality time with the child. In such a scenario, the probability of the child being affected is high. This used to be avoided in joint families where the grand parent takes care of the child. However, in nuclear families, this poses a problem. In such cases, both the parents need to jointly own the responsibility of raising the child and ensure that the child imbibes good values. This will ensure that working does not prove to be a big impediment in the growth of the child........
By
Badri N Srinivasan, Head - Quality, Valtech India Systems Pvt. Ltd.
| 06 09 2010 12:41:36 +0000
Parwati ji, please look at the comment posted by me will definitely clears your opinion towards the topic.
By
Ketan Umrania, Creative Director, PAVEE IMPEX
| 06 09 2010 11:44:03 +0000
No its not uniformly applicable for all bcoz, might we all have noticed that, nonworking women use to passes their much more time in elsewhere and/or in other activities too apart from giving attention to child's carrier. Working women's kids are found more sincere and particular about the study and social etiquettes. The remarkable reason is that, a working woman does observes and experience the surrounding far batter way than a nonworking women, consequently she can learn batter and so can teach batter to her kids. Nonworking women's kids may be more fortunate for enjoying the life in childhood but, once they grown-up, the difference can be found.
By
Ketan Umrania, Creative Director, PAVEE IMPEX
| 06 09 2010 11:40:54 +0000
i agree with shilpa,Child's need is up to certain age.
By
Mohammad Bakhsh, Consultant(Civil), Rail Vikas Nigam Limited
| 06 09 2010 11:08:31 +0000
I don't agree with this. I am working mother and i stay with my in laws, My mom in law is much more experinced than me who takes care of my son in my absence. I am always there for my son when ever he needs me. Kids of working mothers are infact more independent, learns to take decisions easily. Infact my mom was also working. I have no complaints for her. She bought up us well. Good education, clothing, shelter everthing they provide us.
By
Deepali Gulati, COO, Knack HR Solutions
| 06 09 2010 10:29:24 +0000
well i don't agree this, it give financial security to the family and at least money will not obstacle in the future of child if both father mother are working.
By
HEMANT VERMA, Marketing and Branding, NAVNEET PUBLICATION INDIA LTD.
| 06 09 2010 09:12:42 +0000
No if the workimg mother is ataying with inlaws or with her mother to take care of teh child Or the child is under care by any family member then there is no issue in bringup I myself was brought up by my grand mom and my aunt together when my mother used to work and so were my brothers All are well selttled in life issue is if childrenare put in creech then child i affected but not at home with family members
By
Nikhil , Senior Manager, Insurance
| 06 09 2010 08:57:54 +0000
Essentially i agree with what Ms.Yadav says. Children do need support from both parents at various stages of their growth for various reasons. That said, I should also say that it is better, not compulsory, for one of the parents to remain on a part time employment while the children are going thru school. Once they reach college level, it is not an issue. I have found that being on part time, at least by one of the parents, keeps tension, worry levels down as it enhances the ability to deal with situations as they arise. "latch key kids" as they were called in the 70's and 80's do tend to grow up- lacking in self confidence. The poiunt we all nee3d to remember is that work / money is meant to support the family and its needs and NOT the other way around. Sometimes, i feel we have all forgotten that.
By
RAMESH KANDADAI, Principal Consultant, ARM Consultants
| 06 09 2010 08:50:00 +0000
no working mothers' won't effect their children much...may be their might be small contribution from them but overall contribution is from the type of surrounding the child grows...
By
Arihant Prasad.D., Associate Consultant, ....
| 06 09 2010 08:07:20 +0000
|
