Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 1 of 10 in Topic  Next >>
 
Started by : Avinash Gore, Team Lead, Infosys   02 20 2009 11:42:18 +0000
Industry : InternetFunctional Area : Architecture(Technology)
Activity:  217 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

We might be concerned with how easy a particular scaling solution is to integrate with the application language and framework, but they all can be made to scale. I prefer to look at how much the prevailing practices with the technology make change easy. Just 'cause you can prototype it quickly doesn't necessarily mean you can collaborate well with it and evolve it easily. And I've certainly seen my share of funky reinventions of the materialized view, half baked cache management systems and database pounders wind their ways into prototypes that become hacked architecture. Let us discuss the basic mistakes that we need to avoid

 
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
 
 
  3 3 2 2 2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 2 3 4 5
1 Inappropriate use of caching
2 Not Updated with technology!!!
3 Bad DB design
4 Excessive round-tripping
5 Bad User Experience
6 Tight Coupling
7 Nailing up resources
8 Crappy Hacks
9 Not required dynamicism
10 Absence of foresight
11 Production Level Configuration of Web Server/Database/App Server
12 Use of features that degrades performance

Inappropriate use of caching

idea posted by Vijay Gunasekaran Project Manager, HP

Inappropriate use of caching... does that logic need to be cached or is its invocation infrequent enough that maybe a plain old CGI is exactly how it should be implemented?

3
No supporting Arguments for this idea
Add your argument:

Not Updated with technology!!!

idea posted by Sumit Jayaswal Associate/Sr. Associate -(Technical), Cognizant Technologies Solutions

The technology and ways of implementation keeps on changing even as i write this Idea. Lets take a case: earlier we had problems of long loading time of images in the page, but not we use CSS sprites. But the implementation does not necessarily change with the incoming, advanced and better technology. It involves some effort in re-engineering of the web application. No company will like to go for this, unless the are ready to shell out some money.

However the new projects which are developed at this point of time, do use updated technologies (if the developers and architects are well updated with the trends.). We generally tend to measure the performance with a similar application hosted as a competitor site. It really does matter, how are we using the technology. The technology has the solution to speed up the web performance, but the key is to have well informed developers to implement it.

3
0
  
by Samir Das, Tech Architect, Infosys  | 06 25 2009 14:50:27 +0000

Thanks for making it more clear sumit.........

1
  
by Sumit Jayaswal, Associate/Sr. Associate -(Technical), Cognizant Technologies Solutions  | 06 25 2009 14:02:43 +0000

Agreed.. Its a real pain point if you see it from a developer's perspective. But this is what will make him stronger in development. If he doesn't keep up with the changing technologies, then he is bound to get outdated. But regarding these dynamic changes to be incorporated in the web design. I would suggest once in a cycle. My point is that the web application should evolve with technologies. Not as and when they come, but when they are stable and tested. Probably a few people in the RnD team can do this job and suggest the change methodology for the web application. I am just concentrating on a few people to take up this job. Not the whole bunch of developers.

i hope i make my point a bit clear.

0
  
by Samir Das, Tech Architect, Infosys  | 06 25 2009 13:18:49 +0000

Yes Sumit i agree with you that we have to update technology to improve web performances...but then with technology changing drastically time and again don't you think it will pose problems as by the time it is done with new technology some thing other comes up and then don't you think developers will find it difficult cope with new technology where they need themselves to get updated time and again for new technology...

Add your argument:

Bad DB design

idea posted by Diptanjan Mukherjee Team Leader -(Technical), Navayuga Infotech

Most of the time I have seen the problem mainly lies with poor Db design, basic things like indexing not proper, even queries to fetch record is also poor. If the Db design and the queries are improved then one of the basic reson for poor performance is resolved. Small sites are not much effected with this but sites dealing wirh millions of records will surely have the benefit.

2
No supporting Arguments for this idea
Add your argument:

Excessive round-tripping

idea posted by Amit Singhai Project Lead, Covansys

Excessive round-tripping to the database

2
No supporting Arguments for this idea
Add your argument:

Bad User Experience

idea posted by Anirban Bhattacharya Software Architect, Novartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd

Too many features spoils the application. One first needs to identify the business goal and what are the features it required. Simplicity is the key. Your taret customers should not be puzzled and they should get all information at ease. Giving them the best user experience in terms of colors, navigation, accesibility and information are the keys of success. An attractive site does not sell well but a site where the selling process is easier and secured.

2
No supporting Arguments for this idea
Add your argument:

Tight Coupling

idea posted by Ashish Soni Team Lead, Wipro

Tight coupling of architectural pieces that have independent scaling and/or stability requirements...

1
0
  
by Samir Das, Tech Architect, Infosys  | 04 03 2009 12:24:34 +0000

Shivani can you just elaborate on your point so that it becomes more clear as how tight coupling is a reason for poor web performance.

2
  
by Shivani Bansal, Software Developer, Trilogy E-business Software India  | 03 13 2009 05:20:47 +0000

I strongly agree with this point. Entities that can function independently or with minimal support from other entities, should be loosely coupled.

Add your argument:

Nailing up resources

idea posted by Shankar Haldar Project Manager, Kanbay Software

Nailing up resources i.e. does each child thread/process require its own database connection?

1
No supporting Arguments for this idea
Add your argument:

Crappy Hacks

idea posted by Avinash Gore Team Lead, Infosys

Development shortcuts that are quick-n-dirty that also happen to introduce slow-n-dirty runtime characteristics

0
No supporting Arguments for this idea
Add your argument:

Not required dynamicism

idea posted by Subodh Rawool Project Lead, 3i Infotech

Insufficient use of caching or pre-generation of components that are static or have a low change rate

0
No supporting Arguments for this idea
Add your argument:

Absence of foresight

idea posted by Natarajan Kannan Project Manager, Sasken

the absence of foresight on how the architecture will smoothly scale with four or ten or a hundred times the use and sure enough, someone will blame the language or a framework

0
No supporting Arguments for this idea
Add your argument:

Production Level Configuration of Web Server/Database/App Server

idea posted by Chandra Singh Meena Chief Technical Architect, Anmsoft


  • JVM Tunning - GC, load average
  • Database Tunning - Based on the load and data, tunning must be done.
  • Excess log printing (hibernate in debug mode kill the performance)
  • Content delivery optimizations for large traffic across the geographical locations (Expiry headers, web clustering
  • WRONG HTML DESIGN - Too much nested tables, images without size
  • Unused javascripts, large javascripts on the top which is not used until the user actions...
Monitoring the application through jmx of critical parameters over the period time and tune the JVM, Database, Apache (web servers) accordingly.
Long running transactions.(Misuse of Transaction Isolation level)
3rd party integrations without timeouts
Recursions in forwards - A forward to B -B baed on condition forward back to A...
Database Deadlock on increased database size 
Update database (mysql) without PK
Wrong pagination - Bring the whole database in jvm and fetch only first 30
Sorting in database on non-index column
...

 

0
No supporting Arguments for this idea
Add your argument:

Use of features that degrades performance

idea posted by Lahiru Malinda Abeydeera SSE, Virtusa

Using certain features makes the developers life easier. But they are the main bottleneck when it comes to performance. In a performance sensitive application these features must be diabled.

 

E.g. In ASP.NET using Viewstate helps the programmer a lot. But it consumes a lot of bandwith that will degrade the performance of the system.

0
No supporting Arguments for this idea
Add your argument:

Add your Idea
Idea* : 
Add your argument:
edit in rich text ...
Could not find any idea interesting in: "Common reasons for poor web performance" ? Click here to add a new idea...

Found the idea contest "Common reasons for poor web performance"  interesting ?  Click here to refer to your connections and communities
Jobs at multilocations from Top Product and Service Companies
sales & marketing, Business Development Manager( Publishing), Client of Karma kreators, Bangalore
Life Science industry and map our services offerings, Business Development Manager (LifeSciences), Client of Karma kreators, Bangalore
Viewers also viewed
Obviously there is never a winner in “language X is better/faster/more scalable than language...
 
3 referals 34 arguments, 73628 views
We all see what is happening around us. We see all the dirty games that happen in name of...
 
1450 referals 92 arguments, 3218 views
Patients across the country are being over charged by doctors and hospital's without being...
 
25 referals 6 votes, 1616 views
more...  
 
More From Author
We might be concerned with how easy a particular scaling solution is to integrate with the application language and framework, but they all can be made to scale . I prefer to look at how much the prevailing practices with the technology make...
i agree with ashuthosh on this that both QOS and Firewall are important, where large organization will require Qos mainly and smaller ones can have just firewall stuff
This is as simple as it gets, where you are  periodically checking  your competitors Web sites to see if they have  borrowed your copyrighted content without permission. Conduct a search on Copyscape , a free, easy-to-use service that searches the Web...
more...