|
Activity:
52 views;
last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000
|
|
|
|
1
Based on end application size
2
Compilers
3
Hardware Complexity
4
Efficiency
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
As a known fact, the low level languages can explore each & every corner
& feature of selected hardware, but as the complexity of applications in
the current devices being increasing it is difficult to develop them with low
level language. so it is better to decide based on the design & product's complexity,
even the processors become so powerful & their no need to go for optimizing
the code by using low level programming. |
5
|
Hi Bhushan,
generally this decision is made in design time, is the application needs some feuters like modularity(using shared libs from different vendors), security then better go for C++ etc.
if the application deals with hardware, need to configure some registers, hardware mappings ISRs etc. then use C
Mr.Srikanth i agree with you but can you please elaborate as how the complexity of applications will be a factor and how it will effect in selecting the language for an embedded application.
|
Are the compilers reliable? Can we find programmers who really live and breathe it?, I see it as a critical step in promoting software packaging. And, I do believe that re usability is the only reason for migrating from one language to another may be in this case from C to C++
|
0
|
|
The problem of hardware complexity has been mastered by standard parts and a will to use them, even if the design must be altered to fit the available parts. Software folks simply must reach the same mastery of complexity to deal with the larger programs looming in the future.
|
0
|
|
The holy grail of language and compiler debates is efficiency. How fast is the compiled code? How big is it? How one runtime package searches strings a few microseconds faster than another.
|
0
|
- Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
- Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
- Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
|
|
AS BOTH VLSI EMBEDDED ARE CHIP DESIGN LEVEL PROGRAMMING WHICH ONE IS BETTER? MEANS WHICH HAVING... |
|
|
1 referals
9 arguments,
5168 views
|
|
|
JAVA vs .NET |
|
|
0 referals
4 arguments,
712 views
|
|
|
In a surprising news, recently the Gujarat High Court dismissed the claim by the petitioner that... |
|
|
475 referals
148 arguments,
4500 views
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 referals
2 votes,
60 views
|
|
|
we all know the perils of talking on cell phones while driving. besides being hazourdous to... |
|
|
290 referals
2 votes,
36 views
|
|
|
|
202 referals
3 votes,
125 views
|
For hints, tricks and ideas about better ways to build embedded systems, Lets discusses how one should for picking a programming language for embedded system. Each has it's ups and downs, But lets find out the best way. |
A quick and easy way to do this in a 1U x86 type server would be a system from Tyan called a Trophy NR16 (choose the one with 8 copper ports) and then add a serial card from Perle - SX Expandable or UltraPort. |