| Topic : Changing perception of people towards insurance |
|
|
Secure the future - Insurance
|
|
Activity:
187 views;
last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000
|
|
|
|
1
educate the public
2
Need Analysis
3
Insurance is NOT an Investment but a way to hedge risk of cashflow/investment.
4
Please dont compare Insurance with Investment
5
Awareness
6
Insurance Vs. Investment: The dividing line is kept thin - by design!!!!!
7
Insurance Vs. Investment: The dividing line is kept thin - by design!!!!!
8
Transparency & Clarity
9
Need Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
the consumer psychology is such an undefinable thing.to change his/her perception we would have to educate them the through agents and media.this can be done by making insurance mandatory for all individuals... |
4
|
Rightly said........Educating Public about Insurance will create a different perception as another investment option. Offer options to chose from.
I agree to Nishant and John, education is the best way out to change the perception of people. Education will make them aware of the benefits and need for insurance..
Yes Nishanth is right here one needs to educate people and make them understand what they are gaining with having insurance...People have developed impression that insurance people take their money away for a long time...they don't even bother hearing them..and make assumptions...so it is important to convey the message in the right manner.....
|
|
I think its just 8-10 month back story when everybody fighting for changing customer preception from investment to insurance and now its change just opposite its all due to market. But yes definately we can change preception of customer from insurance to investment or investment to insurance by doing proper genuine need analysis of client . and its done |
2
|
people considered insurance as an avoidable investment because of the misselling methods of the advisor used and long term commitments .
the best thing is to sell this on the basis of a need analysis. convince the customer about his future financial needs and its solutions first and suggest the most appropriate plan to satisfy his future needs.
I strongly agree need analysis should be done. As said few are resistant because of its long term nature, if we found this we can recomend products like moneyback and ULIPs with partial withdrawal benefits.
Nowadays companies have wide range of products which can suit any customer, but problem is mis selling,, selling right product to wrong person. this can be eleminated by need analysis and transeprant approach.
|
|
Hi, I am sorry to say that Insurance is NOT an INVESTMENT but a way to reduce RISK of an Investment/Cash-flow.Insurance for tax-saving reasons underplay the basic concept of Insurance which is to ensure cashflow in the event of loss of the bread-butter earner of the family (life ensurance) or any financial asset. The mixed version of insurance with endowment/money-back is like Pizza-base(pure insurance) and adding various flavours like onion or chease making Onion or Chease Pizza.Conflict of interest of insurance agents and ignorance of customers always give rise to sell/buy insurance without proper analysis of one's risk of cashflow and cumbersome approach of insurance co. is also to blame for use of complex terms like Underwriting,ULIPS and many other terms to a layman customer. Simplification of these terminology alongwith customer education drive on national level may help. |
1
|
Insurance should be sold as Insurance.Purchaser will buy it as an Insurance Product.
This Ideal event will happen only when an Advisor will take pain to explain what Insurance is all about & Buyer will patiently listen and understand it.
.Investment attached to Insurance is like Garnishing a food Item.
......Makarand R Bobade. (M.M.S- Mktg.)
|
|
Insurance and Investment are two totally different things and should never be compared with each other. Therefore, all of us from the insurance industry should come to terms with this and stop comparing insurance with investment. |
1
|
|
|
Insurance companies should take all the efforts to make people aware about the products and benefits. They can spread awareness by organising various camps, sending mails or through free counselling for interested people. I think this will help because most of the people are not aware about the inestment benefits of insurance in product like ULIP. To understand ULIP a person should be aware of how the share market works, so only awareness can change perception...... |
1
|
I think Susanta is right. Only awareness can change the perception of people..
|
|
Like in case of Derivatives, Life Insurance should be just that - (i) a cover for unanticipated demise of the breadearner. (ii) it has to address the financial gap that arises on account of event (i) and (iii) in case of loans taken for assets, to cover the outstanding so that the family could retain the asset. In practice, Insurance Advisors/Agents show little interest in pushing Pure Insurance products. Notwithstanding the wealth of information available on the web, the Insurance Advisors still play the crucial role in educating 98% of potential customers. This lack of enthusiaism appears to be on account of less incentive paid by the Insurance Companies as compared to the Investment packaged Insurance products. Of course, the "greed factor" does play a critical role. As everyone worth his salt was looking the other way till the US Economy went into a near comatose and Banks and other FIS were declaring fantasitc returns, dividends and bonuses, the extent of leveraging is completely overlooked and becomes too complicated. Likewise, the Indian consumer also falls into the trap when he is told that a Pure Insurance product yields zero return upon survival of the PolicyHolder as on the date of maturiy. On the contrary, expensive packages like Moneyback Plans become the flavor of the day. If IRDA can make it mandatory for Insurance Companies to provide a split of the Mortality Risk Premium and the other components of the Premium for each element of the package, the dame will become quite transparent. Moreover, how Investment decisons are taken by an Insurance Company or a Portfolio Manager/MF should also get published regularly. |
1
|
|
|
Like in case of Derivatives, Life Insurance should be just that - (i) a cover for unanticipated demise of the breadearner. (ii) it has to address the financial gap that arises on account of event (i) and (iii) in case of loans taken for assets, to cover the outstanding so that the family could retain the asset. In practice, Insurance Advisors/Agents show little interest in pushing Pure Insurance products. Notwithstanding the wealth of information available on the web, the Insurance Advisors still play the crucial role in educating 98% of potential customers. This lack of enthusiaism appears to be on account of less incentive paid by the Insurance Companies as compared to the Investment packaged Insurance products. Of course, the "greed factor" does play a critical role. As everyone worth his salt was looking the other way till the US Economy went into a near comatose and Banks and other FIS were declaring fantasitc returns, dividends and bonuses, the extent of leveraging is completely overlooked and becomes too complicated. Likewise, the Indian consumer also falls into the trap when he is told that a Pure Insurance product yields zero return upon survival of the PolicyHolder as on the date of maturiy. On the contrary, expensive packages like Moneyback Plans become the flavor of the day. If IRDA can make it mandatory for Insurance Companies to provide a split of the Mortality Risk Premium and the other components of the Premium for each element of the package, the dame will become quite transparent. Moreover, how Investment decisons are taken by an Insurance Company or a Portfolio Manager/MF should also get published regularly. |
1
|
|
|
Hi Jitesh, We can not change customer perception about insurance overnight. There is a need from the company side to be as clear as possibl in their plans or products. And the advisor should also be transparent in his dealings and explanation. He should not try to close the deal by doing something on his own and and telling it to the customer. Because if you will be transparent in your work ethics than customer perception will change and their confidence will grow. afterall it is the customer who is going to be affected by your deeds. So his interest should be paramount in your mind. Best Regards
|
1
|
Yes if we are transparent and clear in our dealings with the customers. They will take interest in listening to what we say or do. Than you will not need to educate them separately. We should involve them in the conversation and try to give them an atmosphere where he/she can express his apprehensions to you only than he will understand what you are saying and take interest in your version about insurance. We should clear his apprenshions to a large extent. If it is one way communication than it is very difficult to clear the apprehensions of the customer. While doing all this you should be clear to him as much as possible. It is only after that he will take interest in your communication. It is slightly technical for a lay man to understand that insurance is an investment and not a cash out flow with no return in the near futute. We should try to tell him that he invests his time and money in the upbringing of his ofspring. At that time he is not sure whether he will get the return out of it or not. It is only after the ofspring grows up and pays back in some form or the other that he gets his return. Though both can not be compared completely but a similarity can be drawn to some extent. Like wise we should try to clear all his doubts and apprehensions. That only will pave the way for a useful communication from your side. All this can be done through personal meetings.
|
|
I think its just 8-10 month back story when everybody fighting for changing customer preception from investment to insurance and now its change just opposite its all due to market. But yes definately we can change preception of customer from insurance to investment or investment to insurance by doing proper genuine need analysis of client . and its done |
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the side of an insurance company, insurance is a full spectrum of protection and investment benefits. But to the individual customer struggling to perceive insurance value and attempting to fulfill the myriad family financial demands,... |
i can't agree with amit's comments and Media is showing what is happening right, and they are showing what will happen if recession continues and there is nothing wrong in it, just because that people are not scared, because they have lost their job... |
Is it a good idea for insurance companies to insure M A? |
