| Topic : Brand Dropping: When Brand Turns Burden.... |
|
|
|
|
Activity:
110 views;
last activity : 08 02 2010 06:49:18 +0000
|
|
|
|
1
Set it apart
2
BASED ON CONTRIBUTION/ROI BY BRAND
3
Product based "Sales Organizational Structure"
4
Identify, evaluate and build each brand innovatively
5
Who is targeted?
6
product sells by brand
7
FOCUSSING MORE ON USP OF EVERY BRAND
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The brand a company creates is what a company aspires it to be. It is a company's guarantee to the customer of the quality of the product or service they seek or have come to expect. |
4
|
more or less brands itself create a image of difference.
|
|
Definitely based on the contribution/return on investment by the BRAND There are companies with multiple brands. So the companies have its own merits and demerit. It is very important to differentiate the products from others and proper targeting is also essential. And also it is necessary to analyze which brand contributes more. Moreover the multi -brand companies have the advantages of spreading the risk, greater market share, and profits. However, great care is essential to manage the multiple Brands in the market. Sometimes it leads to nightmare situation which results in cannibalization. For example, suppose Brand X may be a well established brand and Brand Y may be an inspirational brand. Advertizing for Brand Y may lead to a growth in selling, but at the expenses of Brand X. In case the support from the customers is switched back to Brand X, the decline in sales is reversed, but at the cost of Brand Y. This is because each brand from the multiple brand portfolios may be having different customer base with different buying behavior, and different rate of market share. To enhance the market share of each brand a thorough market study is required. Now the question arises as to which brand needs to support? Therefore we have to assess which brand in the portfolio give best return on investment. Here again the ROI will vary according to the brand positioned, contribution, and market share. Besides to the operational advantages, large brands drive market share growth through strong brand equity built over years. The likelihood of increasing market share is much greater among large brands with high brand equity. Funding each brand according to its size or current profitability may fail to capitalize on brands with potential. There are many factors that play a part in such decisions including whether the category is in growth or decline, changing social trend, and demographic changes etc. The importance of particular brands to the company is also a factor which can not be underestimated. Large dominant brands, brands with future potential, and those able to indirectly affect sales may also require support.
|
3
|
Dear Ravindra Sharma Ji
A agree with you sir, it will work.
Dear Mr Arikrishnan,
Normally companies use gains from strong brands to keep the weak alive. will that still work.
|
|
The complexity in handling multiple brands is intense. A product based organizational structure where different brand managers are responsible for different brands will allow the company to be more efficient and quick in responsiveness to the market. Proper care should be also be taken that the organizational structure should not be very deep and a vertical one. A horizontal structure would be more efficient.
|
0
|
|
|
In a scenario where one has to manage multiple brands, the best way to do so is to separately budget for each brand based on its business goals, monitor continously to ensure it doesnt get diverted from the path it is intended for and then build it to a level where it can take care of itself. Very often in multi-brand organisations, brand owners tend to dilute all the brands by either cutting short on the advertising spends or indulge in cross promotions within the brand basket only to upset it all. Hence we have a case where a electric iron is given free on buying a two wheeler only because the ultimate brand owners are the same for both of them. |
0
|
|
|
It is important to identify which target group the brand is aimed at.
Depending on the brand base, it is worthwhile defining the product's unusual or special characteristics which no other product in the market possesses, through advertising campaigns. These special characteristics could be the selling point of the company's products in influencing purchasers to choose the company's product over another. If the company's target market are consumers of low-cost products, a company may wish to design a brand that is simple and easily identified yet distinctive.
Get clearance
Before deciding on the brand, it may be wise to conduct some clearance searches to establish:
* whether the brand is available locally; and
* whether it is available globally.
|
0
|
|
|
the name is enough. the customers take for granted the quality, utility and genuine characteristics.
dropping brands is more on a long term strategy while protecting the brand equity.
|
0
|
|
|
INVARIABLY EVERY BRAND HAS ITS OWN USP,BY VIRTUE OF WHICH IT IS ACCEPTED WIDELY,RECOGNISED AND PATRONISED BY THE CONSUMER,WHICH KEEPS THE BRAND PROFITABLE AND ALIVE.USP HELPS DIFFERENTIATE ONE BRAND FROM THE OTHER.BY FOCUSSING MORE ON USP OF DIFFERENT BRANDS,EVERY PRODUCT WILL HAVE ITS OWN STRONG CONSUMER BASE AND WILL BE ABLE TO GROW FURTHER. |
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The National Sample Survey Organization(NSSO) discovered in its survey that almost half the country's farmers would abandon farming if they could find another occupation. If the FARMER does not grow food what will we eat ??? It is not like... |
Today I read these three diferrent news story related to environment. 1. Desert geopark in China : What is a geopark ? Geopark is a place where rare geological landforms are preserved in an undisturbed state and where low impact recreation,... |
The local currency dropped by Rs 1.24 against the dollar to close at 49.58 and is now expected to further weaken to below Rs 50 against the dollar. One dollor right now is equal to 49.58 Rs and time is not far when it will be more than Rs 50!... |

