Primetime News
|
|
Activity:
22 views;
last activity : 10 10 2010 05:32:59 +0000
|
|
|
|
1
OBVIOUSLY INDIAN TALENT
2
Young workforce & Brand of capitalism
3
One child family is the undoing of china
4
India to outpace China? Why?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
36% of scientists at Nasa are Indians: Govt survey-India-The Times of India 11 Mar 2008, 0004 hrs IST,TNN NEW DELHI: If you thought that Global Indian Takeover was just a hollow cliche leaning on a few iconic successes like Pepsi's Indra Nooyi, Citibank's Vikram Pandit and steel world's Lakshmi Mittal, there is a slew of statistics now to give it solid ballast. The extent to which desis have made an impact in the US was reeled off in the Rajya Sabha — as many as 12% scientists and 38% doctors in the US are Indians, and in Nasa, 36% or almost 4 out of 10 scientists are Indians. If that's not proof enough of Indian scientific and corporate prowess, digest this: 34% employees at Microsoft, 28% at IBM, 17% at Intel and 13% at Xerox are Indians. And the House of Elders also heard some startling facts about a country that's still stuck with a Third World tag — 20% of gold in the world is used by Indians and nine out of 10 diamonds used in the world are made in India. The figures of Indian successes were given to the Rajya Sabha on Monday by D Purandeshwari, minister of state for HRD, in defence of the country's higher education system and the state of research. Purandeshwari said that although a lot needed to be done to encourage research, it was wrong to run down the country's higher education system since most Indians who excelled abroad were products of Indian institutions. He said there was no slackness in research and the number of PhD holders had gone up from 17,898 two years back to 18,730 last year. The minister also listed initiatives taken to encourage research, especially in science. Apart from creating 1,000 positions of research scientists at various levels, she said draft norms to create 10 networking centres in basic sciences in leading departments of universities were being prepared. It would help in promoting collaborative research and give access to advanced facilities. Also, all postgraduate programmes pertaining to science and technology would have an in-built component of research. The University Grants Commission is also identifying performing universities so that they can be given 50 fellowships to carry out research in basic sciences. |
1
|
BUT ALAS! ITS
"BRAIN DRAIN"
WHICH CAN ONLY BE CONTROLLED BY IMPROVING OPPORTUNITIES BY INDIAN GOVERNMENT FOR TALENTED INDIAN CITIZENS.OR THERE CAN BE POLICY OR AMENDMENT IN POLICIES SO AS TO SUSTAIN THE IGNITED MINDS.AT LAST "THANKS TO RESERVATION POLICIES " FORCE INTELLECTUALS TO MOVE ABROAD.
|
|
I think this is an important factor for India to surpass China's economy...thanks to a young workforce and a brand of capitalism that outweighs its much derided democracy... |
0
|
|
|
The One child family is the undoing of china, the average of china is above 60, as time passes the young work force will not be available to china, where as india followed two child family norm and the supply of young work force is ensured |
0
|
|
|
Recent issue of Economist hit the right note when it said that the India as a country may be lacking in some fields but its private companies are strong. Despite its many shortfalls, India is doing extremely well. Its economy is expected to expand by 8.5% this year. It is given that India has a long way to go before it is as rich as China (Chinese economy is four times bigger) However, India’s growth rate could overtake China’s by due tio its, 2013, if not before. Some economists predict that India will grow faster than any other large country over the next 25 years. Economist adds that Rapid growth in a country of 1.2 billion people is exciting, to put it mildly. Why? Here Economist cites two reasons; Demography- China’s shrinking workforce and India’s much-derided democracy. Besides, India’s individualistic brand of capitalism may also be more robust than China’s state-directed sort. Chinese firms prosper under wise government, but bad rulers can cause far more damage in China than in India, because their powers are so much greater. Many of the country’s dynamic entrepreneurs waste hours each day stuck in traffic. Their firms are hobbled by the costs of building their own infrastructure: backup generators, water-treatment plants and fleets of buses to ferry staff to work. India’s problems are painfully visible. The roads are atrocious. Public transport is a disgrace. But, India’s literacy rate is rising, thanks in part to a surge in cheap private schools for the poor. The Indian government recognises, the need to tackle the infrastructure crisis, and is getting better at persuading private firms to stump up the capital. Given the choice between doing business in China or India, most foreign investors would probably pick China. The market is bigger, the government easier to deal with, and if your supply chain for manufactured goods does not pass through China your shareholders will demand to know why. But as the global economy becomes more knowledge-intensive, India’s advantage will grow. That is something to ponder while stuck in the Delhi traffic.
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes our moeny saving thought process is narrow and we do some stupid mistakes which actually makes us spend more than we save. Such mistakes should better be avoided. To avoid first we need to know what all mistakes can we make. So let us... |
Integration of goods and services taxation would give India a world class tax system and improve tax collections. It would end the long standing distortions of differential treatments of manufacturing and service sector. The introduction of goods and... |
Ego comes naturally ..as you rise you either need to protect yourself from it or it will show its colour. Ego clashes come out of four walls in no time. |

