Mr. Anna Hazare is using his moral eminence in a very immoral and decadent manner, which can be put in the category of blackmail. Fast unto death is a very tricky situation, and in a democratic country like ours, this has no place, as you cannot go on a fast unto death if things do not turn out your way. By indulging into such fasts on various occasions Mr. Hazare has shown a lot of irresponsibility and naiveté.

It isn't a matter that the congress and the communists are against this bill, but fact is very clear from a citizen point of view and I am continuously insisting on it's non-formation as I feel that the 5 very representatives who claim to be the civil society by themselves aren't trustworthy themselves. Factually there is a jeopardy in the selection of the civil society like one of the representative is Mr. Arvind Kejriwall who is the best flatterer of Mr. Anna Hazare, then the family psychodrama of the Bhushan (Shanti Bhushan and Prashant Bhushan), moreover Mr. Santosh Hegde was a failure in his area he previously worked( Manglore, Karnataka) for and not a single case is put to conclusion. and Mr. Anna Hazare who himself is merely acting like a catalyst to agitate and fool the common mass by claiming the bill to curb corruption where the members are so much like a group of fast friends. How can we expect clarity of the civil society members? Also respected Mr. Anna Hazare selected the members, why didn't he asked for a public opinion before selection of representatives of the civil society? 

Mr. Sharma, inevitable has not yet happened.  This Bill is not a cake-walk for politicians, because this directly concerns each one of them!   So far, every legislation was made with "Proviso" clause to exclude them in some form or the other to escape any sort of situation!  Civil Society is blunt, not taking care of such escapable provisions in their draft bill!  Political parties, cutting across party lines, would try and scuttle this!  I don't think the primary opposition party would welcome it in the monsoon session.  If this Bill is introduced in true spirit, almost 40-45% of our existing politicians would be languishing in separate cells!  Civil Society has also started their "advocacy campaigns" visiting major towns to make this draft known to common citizens.  People now have realized that the politicians would be involved in mud-slinging exercise.  They do not want to see another police excess in peaceful protest!  Opinions from elites are divided.  Government's NAC is talking about amendments in "People's Representation Act, 1951" to divert the attention of Anna's campaign!  They will do anything and everything to stall the proceedings!  We can only pray Almighty to bring this Bill a reality!

R.K. Dhawan's statements shows us the congress view point on curbing corruption. Mr. Dhawan opined that " Govt. need not be so soft in dealing with this kind of people- If it is Indira Gandhi, she would have dealt the situation more firmly". Is Mr. Dhawan is in in exile and failed speak a single word, when the Govt. is acting soft in dealing with terrorism and terrorists.  Bardhan, a old fashioned communist. It seems Mr. Bardhan and his party are worrying about the people's support being enjoyed by Mr. Anna and the other four. Since BJP is supporting this movement, communists naturally opposes anything blindly. We cant expect a response differently from him and his party.