Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  19 of 26 in Topic  Next >>
Topic : New Drugs Value Creation
  Rate : 
Posted in Community :

Brand Management

 
Assessing Brand Value by Jaygopal Raghavan, Head/VP/GM-Client Servicing, Percept Holdings

Assessing Brand Value

By : Jaygopal Raghavan, Head/VP/GM-Client Servicing, Percept Holdings
Industry : Management & Strategy Consulting Functional Area : Branding
Keywords :

Branding

Brand Value

Assessment

Assessing

Activity:  2 comments  513 views  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:04 +0000
 Refer 88
Share
 
 
 
A How-To Guide to Assessing Brand Value
by Catherine Tremblay 


A brand can be a business’ most valuable asset, yet its value is generally not reflected in the financial statements. As with other intellectual property, its value is accounted for on the balance sheet only when acquired from another business or as a result of a business combination, but not when generated internally. How, then, is management to track brand value and make informed decisions with respect to what could be the company’s most valuable asset? The answer lies in business valuation—both theory and practice. The methods used in valuing businesses can be applied to valuing intangible assets and intellectual property, including brands.

We must first determine: What does a “brand” encompass? A brand can include a trademark, logo, trade dress, packaging, marketing strategy, colors and all the elements that consumers associate with the brand image. We should also keep in mind that some brands have sub-brands, (e.g., Coca-Cola has Classic Coke, Diet Coke, Cherry Coke, Zero, etc). Furthermore, part of the value of a brand can be attributed to certain other intangible assets. In the Coke example, the special recipe (formula) is part of the brand’s success. We need to “zero-in” on exactly what it is we’re valuing (pun intended).

Continuing with the Coke example, Interbrand valued the Coca-Cola brand at an estimated $65.3 billion in 1997, assigning it the number one rank among brands worldwide. In comparison, the net book value of the intangible assets recorded on Coca-Cola’s financial statements was merely $3.7 billion, which shows that the brand’s value goes largely unrecognized on the balance sheet. What’s more, Coca-Cola’s market capitalization (i.e., the stock market’s valuation of the company) was an estimated $140 billion, which, when compared with the brand value of $65.3 billion, shows that the market attributed value to intangible assets well over and above the estimated brand value. There are three fundamental approaches to be considered in valuing a brand:
  • The cost approach;
  • The income approach; and
  • The market approach.
The cost approach is based on an accumulation of the costs incurred to build the brand since inception, such as historical advertising and promotion expenditures, campaign creation costs, trademark registration costs, etc. However, it is generally the least applicable approach in the valuation of brands because the cost of developing the brand usually bears little relationship to the brand’s income-generating potential. After all, investors are interested in the brand’s ability to generate future earnings. The income approach is based on the net present value methodology, which seeks to measure the economic benefit of the brand to be generated from a stream of future earnings or cash flows. One possible application of this approach is the “incremental income” method, based on the premise that a branded item can command a premium selling price compared to similar, less well-known products. The branded item can also bring about economies of scale in production, due to larger volumes of sales from higher market demand. However, the business valuator will offset the advertising expenses that are required to maintain brand awareness over and above that of a non-branded product. Forecasts and projections are made of the income stream to be generated from the increased sales and cost savings, net of additional advertising and promotional costs, specifically attributable to the brand. The net present value of the future incremental income stream generated by the brand would be determined by applying a discount rate. This discount rate is based on the rate of return that an investor would expect on an investment in the brand, based on its risk profile and characteristics. The higher the perceived risk, the higher the required return. An alternative method that can be applied under the income approach is the projection of a stream of earnings or cash flows for the business as a whole, against which contributory charges are applied to recognize the contribution of other assets (e.g., working capital, fixed assets and other intangible assets) in generating the overall income stream attributable to the brand. The residual income stream attaching to the brand is then discounted to its present value as noted earlier. The market approach estimates the value of a brand by reference to market transactions involving similar brands. The most common application is the relief-from-royalty method, which assumes that the user of a brand would have to license the rights to use it, if the user was not also the owner of the brand. In other words, if a company owns the brand, it avoids the payment of royalties for the use of the brand. The royalty rate is generally a market rate derived from an analysis of royalty or license agreements for similar assets (used as “guidelines”). Adjustments are made, as appropriate, to reflect differences between the risk profiles, industry conditions, brand awareness and strength, geographical coverage, and other characteristics of the subject brand as compared with those of the “guideline” brands in the market. The estimated royalty rate is then applied to the forecasted net revenues to be generated by the brand, with the result discounted to present value using an appropriate rate of return as described above. The principal difficulty with the market approach is finding comparable and meaningful transactions from which to derive an applicable royalty rate, and making the appropriate adjustments to reflect differences between the brands under comparison.

In a nutshell, the valuation of a brand can be more of an art than a science—but it’s an exercise that can help management identify and develop the value drivers behind the brand. Professionals, such as Chartered Business Valuators and members of the American Society of Appraisers, can provide insight and assistance in the valuation of brands and other intangible assets.

go to top
 
2 comments on "Assessing Brand Value"
Sort by: Most Recent Top Rated
  Commented by  varsha mishra, technical Manager, rfrac    | 10 02 2008 13:18:51 +0000 
nice sharing
  Commented by  Anurag Mitra, Product Marketing Manager (Asia Pacific)    | 05 25 2008 08:48:31 +0000 
good one...thanks for referring...Brand is one of the the most important aspect for an organisation yet is intangible...
Add your comment on "Assessing Brand Value"

Rate:
Submit
 Found the article "Assessing Brand Value"  interesting ?  Share with your connections and communities  
Leading Recruitment Firm
Arrkay is a recruitment consulting firm providing one stop solution for all kinds of permanent and temporary staffing requirements. The industries in focus are IT, Aerospace, Engineering, Semiconductors, Manufacturing and KPO. We are part of an aggressively growing business group Arrkay......
Viewers also viewed
Today too many options are available all around us and we see that people keep on jumping from...
 
1432 referals 16 votes, 420 views
Many brands become stagnant and then they die. What to do if you want to give it a new start ?...
 
1986 referals 13 votes, 786 views
Indian MBA vs International MBA
 
452 referals 18 arguments, 223 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (85)
50 Things to do Before you Die Photo by  Anne Froelisch   1. Set foot on each of the seven...
 
529 referals 13 comments, 270 views
Successful Project Managers   - Characteristics and Skills What are the Characteristics of...
 
203 referals 14 comments, 11875 views
CORRUPTION INSTITUTE OF INDIA (CII) (World's best C- School on the World Corruption Index...
 
423 referals 4 comments, 100 views
more...  
Sponsored Jobs
More From Author
and kick the politicians as in they should not be involved. A gag order should be issued to restrain politicians and media from commenting on it. IT should be followed by a short announcement by the EC on the voting date. People all over the ocuntry...
Nothing should be imposed or made compulsory. Supposing it is made compulsory to use only lotus - our national flower for all festivals and in temples, how ridiculous it sounds ? In the same breath imposing a language would be counterproductive. The...
Its just that they are so caught up with their own problems in life that they dont have time for the poor. Then again, the question that begs askance is "Is the rich yuppie class aware of the needs of the poor ?" I in fact feel that the urban middle...
more...  
  • Popular Knowledge
  •  
  •  
  • Popular Jobs
  •