Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  13 of 42 in Topic  Next >>
Topic : politics of india
  Rate : 
Posted in Community :

Foreign Policy

 
By : Rajeev Sharma, Strategic Analyst, Columnist, Publishing
Industry : Publishing Functional Area : Politics
Keywords :

india-syria

Activity:  2 comments  226 views  last activity : 10 20 2011 11:25:27 +0000
 Refer 95
Share
 
 
 

Behind India’s Syria Diplomacy

In a transparent attempt to win friends and influence people in the Islamic world, India joined Brazil, South Africa and Lebanon in abstaining from voting on a UN Security Council resolution threatening sanctions against Syria. The resolution, drafted after a month of hectic international diplomacy, eventually collapsed after permanent Security Council members Russia and China vetoed it.

India’s permanent representative to the United Nations, Hardeep Puri, gave the reasons for the Indian decision in a speech yesterday at the Security Council. Puri said India has been engaging Syria in a collaborative and constructive dialogue, adding that Delhi had urged Damascus to exercise restraint, abjure violence and pay heed to the aspirations of its people.

India has urged the international community to give the Syrian government some time and space to implement its ‘far-reaching reform measures.’ At the same time, India has also appealed to opposition forces in Syrian to abandon their armed insurrection and negotiate with the government.

India has categorically told the UN Security Council that it doesn’t want to muddy the Syrian waters further by leaving the threat of sanctions and regime change hanging like the Sword of Damocles over the Assad administration. The key paragraph in Puri’s speech stated: ‘The resolution under the Council’s consideration does not accommodate our concern about the threat of sanctions. It does not condemn the violence perpetrated by the Syrian opposition. Nor does it place any responsibility on the opposition to abjure violence and engage with the Syrian authorities for redressal of their grievances through a peaceful political process. We have, therefore, abstained on the resolution.’

However, it’s significant that India abstained rather than voted against the resolution. Why did it do so? Almost certainly because India started its two-year term as a non-permanent member of the Security Council at the start of this year, and so doesn’t want to annoy the United States with a ‘nay’ when abstaining is just as good a working option. After all, foreign policy is ultimately about countries protecting their own national interests.

But aside from trying to protect its interests in the Islamic World, India will also likely have had the Libya issue at the forefront of its mind. Some of the diplomacy over holding Muammar Gaddafi to account sounds remarkably similar to what is being tried with Syria. But that soon degenerated into a NATO-led military operation eyeing regime change.

Despite the combined power of US and European forces, Gaddafi clung on to power for months, further denting the United States’ image and confidence. By abstaining in this week’s vote, India has managed to avoid inserting itself into what is developing into some very messy diplomacy. 

 
TrackBack URL:
2 comments on "Behind India’s Syria Diplomacy"
  Commented by  LAXMAN KESHWALA, Freelancer, Telecom/ISP    | 10 20 2011 11:25:27 +0000
The friends are not cheap and easy to make them agree without any gift.Our Indian public are paying over head taxes and government gives helps and benefits only for friendship{?} which foreign policy is shows that we are going to suside without poision.
  Commented by  Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.    | 10 20 2011 10:52:28 +0000
I believe what India did at this moment is correct.  We need to win confidence every other member nation to get the berth of permanent membership in the UNSC. Pakistan working against our interests in Islamic world so as China.  This is a wise move by India from any angle. India also tackled  the Iran issue well in the recent past.  All the very best India.  Thank you Mr. Rajeevji for this post.
Add your comment on "Behind India’s Syria Diplomacy"

Rate:
Submit
Leading Recruitment Firm
requirements open in bangalore location for healthcare advertising
positions open in bangalore location for healthcare advertising
Viewers also viewed
BY CREATING A NEW SYSTEM vs BY BEING IN THE SYSTEM TO CHANGE THE SYSTEM
 
510 referals 151 arguments, 38876 views
yes !!!main drawback vs No,india has other drawback
 
0 referals 6 arguments, 937 views
Yes vs No
 
66 referals 22 arguments, 8745 views
more...  
 
More From Author
Xi ’s upcoming India visit means Modi faces diplomatic tightrope Building trust should be main theme of Xi's visit. http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/878314.shtml
SAARC satellite's an old idea whose time has finally come, thanks to Modi  http://www.firstpost.com/world/saarc-satellites-old-idea-whose-time-finally-come-thanks-modi-1596429.html?utm_source=FP_HP_CATEGORYRANK
Iraq hostage crisis: A look at India's strategic options http://www.firstpost.com/world/iraq-hostage-crisis-a-look-at-indias-strategic-options-1591849.html?utm_source=FP_HP_CATEGORYRANK
more...