Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 
Industry : Biotechnology Functional Area : R&D
Activity:  3 comments  529 views  last activity : 02 06 2012 14:39:42 +0000
Share
 
 
 

Biotechnology V/s Intellectual Property

 

Intellectual Property is the term used to describe the branch of law, which protects the application of thoughts, ideas, and information, which are of commercial value. It thus covers the law relating to patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and other similar rights (Cornish, 1989). MODERN BIOTECHNOLOGY -- or "biological engineering," as some have called it -- has excited the imaginations and provoked the concerns of almost every part of society

 

Biotechnology companies and much of the mass media tout advances in modern biotechnology as little less than miraculous. The new techniques of engineering life are said to be responsible for two revolutions in contemporary society: a technological revolution, which promises solutions to hunger and disease, and a productive revolution, which will increase the efficiency of research development and manufacture of new products. Coupled with strong domestic and international intellectual property rights, such as patents, biotechnology becomes a tool for transferring technology and securing new markets in the global economy. The temporary monopoly of new technologies permitted by patents give national economies a comparative advantage in trade. Moreover, recent developments in intellectual property law have allowed unprecedented claims to be made to the whole or parts of living organisms and have undermined traditional notions of "public domain" and common ownership.

 

Intellectual property protection for biotechnology is currently in a state of flux. Whilst it used to be the case that living organisms were largely excluded from protection, attitudes are now changing and increasingly biotechnology is receiving some form of protection.

Keeping biotechnology 'secret' can also be a valuable form of protection. National treatment of trade secrets is diverse, and all attempts to harmonize trade secret laws in Europe, for example, have failed. Most jurisdictions do provide some form of protection against those who steal or use others' trade secrets unfairly. However, the problem with this form of protection is that the secret generally becomes public once the biotechnology is used commercially and thus the protection is lost. It is conceivable that the law of copyright could afford some protection for biotechnology. Lines of genetic code are analogous to some extent with computer program code, which has now been incorporated into the copyright systems of most industrialised countries. However, this route to protection is fraught with practical and conceptual difficulties and is generally thought to be unsuitable. There is as yet no recorded case of biotechnologists claiming copyright in their inventions.

Trademarks are also unlikely to be of much use in protecting biotechnology, though they may of course prove important later in regard to marketing products, processes or services. An attempt to register the name of a plant or an animal, as a trademark is unlikely to be successful as public policy would prevent it.

A patent is a grant of exclusive rights for a limited time in respect of a new and useful invention. The exact requirements for grant of a patent, the scope of protection it provides and its duration differs depending on national legislation. However, generally the invention must be of patentable subject matter, novel (new), non-obvious (inventive), of industrial application and sufficiently disclosed. A patent will provide a wide range of legal rights, including the right to possess, use, transfer by sale or gift, and to exclude others from similar rights. Duration will be for around 20 years (although for only 17 years in the USA). These rights are generally restricted to the territorial jurisdiction of the country granting the patent and thus an inventor wishing to protect his/her invention in a number of countries will need to seek separate patents in each of those countries.

IPRs may also adversely affect(i) Food security, (ii) Use of evolved agricultural practices,(iii) Biological diversity and ecological balance and (iv) The livelihood of the poor in developing countries. 

Since a better understanding of intellectual property by research scientists and university/institute administrators will increase the pace of research for technological development in biotechnology. In the present, we will discuss the various intellectual properties relevant to developments in biotechnology. In the next chapter, we will discuss the specific problem of patenting of biological material, the problem related with deposit of material for obtaining the patent claim and the international conventions in this connection.

 Choice of Intellectual Property Protection Biotechnological products can be protected by anyone of the four intellectual property rights discussed above. These properties can be bought, sold and licensed like any other property. Selection of the most appropriate mode of protection is a business judgement based on several factors, which differ from case to case. These include the following: (i) Pace of technological development: if it is rapid then a trade secret approach may be preferable to patenting.(ii) Associated costs: although the cost of secrecy may exceed the cost of obtaining a patent, but it may be more expensive to enforce the patent, so that one will have to decide, whether trade secret is a better protection.(iii) Security considerations: it may be impossible to prevent disclosure of a trade secret, so that one may prefer rights other than secrecy.(iv) Need to show patents: patents may have to be shown to investors as a measure of success. The choice of protection also depends on the nature of subject matter that needs to be protected. For instance, an instruction manual can be copyrighted or also protected as trade secret, but cannot be protected as a patent.
 
3 comments on "Biotechnology V/s Intellectual Property"
  Commented by  venkataramana karapakula, Patent Analyst, SPA    | 02 06 2012 14:39:42 +0000
hallo ,

me also working in IP. my background is biotechnoly.If u find any vacancy in your organisation, pls refer me
  Commented by  ASHISH MITTAL, STUDENT, IIT ROORKEE    | 02 18 2009 07:30:41 +0000
BRILLIANT ANALOGY
  Commented by  Bellala Gopinatha Rao, Project Manager Promax Management Consultants    | 01 03 2009 13:23:39 +0000
Good one thanks
Add your comment on "Biotechnology V/s Intellectual Property"

Rate:
Submit
Leading recruitment Firm
Leading recruitment Firm
Viewers also viewed
i think it will be good to develop technology very fast vs it is not good to develop technology fast
 
1710 referals 27 arguments, 477 views
Future for the biotech industry is great and booming everyday. The first step in this direction...
10 referals 4 comments, 2534 views
Recently, scientists have announced a bold step in the enduring quest to create artificial life...
 
562 referals 146 arguments, 2206 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (79)
World IP Day, 26 April: "The Power of Ideas as the seedbed for innovation and creativity" "World...
4 referals 1 comments, 217 views
NANDKUMAR B.SAWANT.,M.COM.LL.B.(MUMBAI),ADVOCATE MOBILE.09325226691, 09271971251...
 
24 referals 17 comments, 11573 views
Fiscal deficit * Fiscal deficit seen at 5.9 percent of GDP in 2011-12 * Fiscal deficit seen at...
 
2998 referals 20 comments, 544 views
more...  
More From Author
Who owns the rights to genes and transgenic organisms? One of the hottest controversies raised by genetic engineering is over commercial rights. Now we can manipulate nature like this, should be able to patent genes and genetically modified...
Biotechnology V/s Intellectual Property   Intellectual Property is the term used to describe the branch of law, which protects the application of thoughts, ideas, and information, which are of commercial value. It thus covers the law relating to...
more...