Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 
Posted in Community :

HR Professionals

 
By : Brigadier (Retd) Sunil Chadha,, Retd
Functional Area : Organizational Development
Activity:  4 comments  182 views  last activity : 05 08 2012 14:16:54 +0000
 Refer 293
Share
 
 
 

Let me share a few issues for TS members. Demarcation of the boundary was initially made with limited accuracy (reasons beyond scope here). At places it did not follow geographical features. The line stopped at a point known as NJ 9842 on the map – with no demarcation beyond. It is due to the strategic importance of the Saltoro Ridge that Pakistani troops began creeping up & we were left with no option but to quickly occupy our territory. That was 1984.

Today we occupy advantageous strategic positions. There is far more to our northern frontiers than Siachen Glacier. We do have a significant presence of troops in various other parts of the north. The Siachen glacier is only a fraction. Heights are dizzying, temperatures are sub sub zero (can only be felt, not imagined), silence is total (actually screams at you), and the loneliness is so profound that only the numbers of troops going hysterical, or otherwise suffering, can explain. Even walking with such low oxygen levels is tremendous effort – sometimes 30 metres on relatively level ground may mean 5 to 6 stops for rest !! amazing isn’t it ? Avalanches happen with equal periodicity on our side of the border too. The sheer sound of the avalanche is not for the weak hearted, leave alone the devastating sight of one. we also see these high altitude challenges and focus on many themes to preserve those of us who are there. Notwithstanding, we lose lives. Avalanches and other hazards are equally dangerous and destructive on our side of the border too. The loss of a comrade can hardly be described in words & is never without collateral damage.

Who but the army would be the happiest to return from such a place ? but there is more to the story. Sitting in AC rooms and watching maps or ppt slides can not give anyone the whole story. Our having held on since 1984 to date is not without reason. Besides every inch of the motherland being important, we must acknowledge that some areas deserve greater significance due to the effect their loss may cause (or gains that may accrue to the adversary). Vacating Saltoro Ridge where we are at an advantage can lead to severe handicaps. Without going into details - 1. Is there a guarantee that Pakistani troops will not creep up again ? 2. Some of our flanks may be seriously exposed. 3.. Pakistan – China will have free run north of the vacated areas. 4. Leh town (& a lot else) coming within enemy artillery range becomes a possibility. 5. ISI guided terror outfits can play hell in the Ladakh region as well. --- And many many more !!!

Where were the voices for demilitarisation till now ? It appears as if the voices for demilitarization suddenly woke up after Prez Zardari’s visit. Or did the loss of lives due to an avalanche move them ? Did they nor hear the sounds of the avalanches on our side over the years ? Did the media not cover (& with pictures when it suited them), the last journeys of countless of our comrades and countrymen ? What will be the cost of demilitarisation and establishment of a new line of defence ? How long will it take us ? What quantum of troops will be required at the new line ? Can we ever hope to take back Saltoro Ridge if occupied by our adversary ? Which troops will take back Saltoro Ridge, if lost ? With or without acclimitision ? Time required to acclimitise ? Time for movement & deployment of heavy equipment – possibly under fire ?  Have we forgotton Kargil ? Did the studies into the 'cost of kargil' also factor in the cost paid by the families of those who fell ? Have we thought of countering infiltration through miles of mountainous territory which would be exposed ? What happens to the civilians inhabitants who would be exposed without protection or livelihood (since our troops would be pulled back - leaving these citizens 'outside').

There are a million questions.

The media should refrain from creating a hype & not rush us into ‘agreeing’ to demilitarise without the deepest of strategic thought. Views of the professionals must be given due regard even ahead of diplomacy & politics. Let us not get fooled into commitment. There are enough examples of both Pakistan & China showing scant respect for world opinion. Let us, for once, have an opinion of our own.

 Top Comment : Srinivas suravajhala   | 05 04 2012 06:28:06 +0000
Great sir. Media creates stories without knowing the ground reality, but the opinion of a person of your stature can only presents us the real picture. As you said rightly both Pakistan and China have scant respect for world opinion, so they became the natural friends. Our experience shows that we hardly find correlation in the actions and the words of Pakistan and its army. we need to carefully dissect the Kayani's statement on demilitarisation of the glacier from that angle.
 
4 comments on "DEMILITARIZATION OF SIACHEN GLACIER"
  Commented by  Brigadier (Retd) Sunil Chadha,, Retd    | 05 08 2012 14:16:54 +0000
More about the avalanche. News reports that Americans, Chinese, German & Swiss teams assisted.  The Pakistan Army used whatever resources it could muster & move – surface & air. (Movement by surface means is extremely hazardous and painfully slow. Movement by air (helicopters) is severely limited; restricted hours of operation, unpredictable weather & other limiting effects at such high altitudes. 

The avalanche wiped away nearly a kilometre of the road which was the lifeline to Pakistani troops on the Saltoro Ridge line. Several Pakistani positions on Saltoro Ridge are cut off. Those that are not have to hold the positions & provide whatever relief is possible from their already strained resources. 

If we have significant tactical advantages, Pakistan has had logistics advantages on the Ridge. They occupy positions at lower altitudes – supplied comparatively easily. Our supply lines are longer, over much harsher & dangerous terrain, & costlier in terms of human lives.
  
For many years Pakistan needed this border issue alive due to various internal compulsions including US aid, besides their India centric paronia. Today, they have diversified (LOL) & money flows in for fighting other self-inflicted cancers. They continue to need the Actual Ground Position Line (AGPL) issue to be kept alive – but its now going to be very much more costlier – and for a quite a while now.  

What is worrying for them now is the fact that the avalanche disrupted supply line passes through the Shia dominated areas of North Pakistan – almost on the verge of an insurgent implosion. In short, they know that their challenges have multiplied, but want to keep this option also open – favourably & at reduced cost !!

Infringement of an agreed upon demarcated line depicting an international boundary within which respective nations administer their respective territories, will attract negative world opinion. It is seen as a wilful act of aggression. Any talks which leave out the demarcation of the AGLP, therefore, have the seeds of fraud already sown. In effect, what Pak is asking us to do is this. No demarcation – implying - area remains disputed, does not have international recognition, land grabbing would not be an infringement into ‘our’ territory. De-militarize – give up all our tactical advantages and leave the area vulnerable to exploitation at a time, place & manner of their convenience. They expect us to ‘invite’ them into the area with a promise that we will make no ‘noise’.  
 
We have been kind enough already. At its weakest perhaps today, the Pak defences on the Saltoro Ridge would collapse in no time if we decided to go after them. Imagine the reaction of Pak troops, cut off from their rear, limited reserves, no resupply, no reinforcements – their morale (a battle winning factor) at its lowest. Militarily alone, doing a ‘Kargil’ on them at this point appears to be insanely simple. Instead, the Indian approach has far deeper ramifications & needs to be supported. Media would do the nation a great service to take up such themes rather than to end up creating a hysteria in support of what our adversary desires.
  Commented by  Vinoy Scaria James, Consultant, Travel Hub    | 05 05 2012 01:18:37 +0000
Thanks Brigadiersaab! I too agree with the posts that it was indeed fortunate that you sought share an insider's reading of such a important issue. I also agree with Srinivasji that unfortunately we will not see such authentic articles or even news items like this in the mainstream media. The number of genuine experts in highly topical subjects like this are painfully dismal. And even the small numbers of such experts are given step motherly treatement compared to journos who are trained to detect and report star pregnancies and relationship status.  

It is high time that both India and Pakisthan put aside their shrill retoric and posturing, if we want to make the Asian age a reality. Or all the Asian countries will miss the bus (except for China). We should be careful to move forward without compromising on our security concerns. For that due importance have to be given to experts and learned students of the topic in the decision making.
  Commented by  Suryanarayan Murthy, Asst Vice President (Corporate Finance), A Hydro Power Project    | 05 04 2012 08:18:41 +0000
Rating : +1 
A wonderful insight into the unknown area ! Yes, I agree with you that "For once, let's have an opinion of our own". I understand that some medicines were acquired from Kirgisthan (the military capital of Soviet Union??) during Kargil war that helps our forces to sustain sub zero and low oxygen levels?
  Commented by  Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.    | 05 04 2012 06:28:06 +0000
Rating : +1 
Great sir.  Media creates stories without knowing the ground reality, but the opinion of a person of your stature can only presents us the real picture. As you said rightly both Pakistan and China have scant respect for world opinion, so they became the natural friends.  Our experience shows that we hardly find correlation in the actions and the words of Pakistan and its army.  we need to carefully dissect the  Kayani's statement on demilitarisation of the glacier from that angle.  
Add your comment on "DEMILITARIZATION OF SIACHEN GLACIER"

Rate:
Submit
Top IT Recruitment Firm
Top IT Recruitment Firm
Viewers also viewed
Which is most important?
 
209 referals 129 arguments, 5884 views
a comparison of top-down and bottom-up planning in management.
 
40 referals 9 arguments, 1189 views
Green HR  is one which involves two essential elements: environmentally friendly HR practices...
 
121 referals 8 votes, 7991 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (13)
Facebook will have market value of $234 billion by 2015, up from its current valuation of $85...
 
872 referals 22 comments, 490 views
Military Strength: Comapre India and Pakistan Manpower and Ground Forces India has the second...
49 referals 9 comments, 67492 views
Why the pen is mightier than the keyboard: Children who write by hand 'learn better than those...
 
382 referals 10 comments, 205 views
more...  
More From Author
it would be in our national interest to work with a peaceful neighbourhood. seen as neighbour we need to think one way. seen as a belligerent neighbour the scene changes somewhat. seen as an adversary the window opens to whole new set of options....
nice and exhaustive article sharmaji. presence in gwadar also enhances the capability of other sino assets operating in the indian ocean region - a fact already brought out in your article. the strategic implications would surely be global and will in...
thanks sharma sir, as always a well thought out and well expressed analysis. one doesn't go for a military option without clarity of the end state. unless we can define what we plan to achieve by an armed response, we may find ourselves floundering....
more...