Errors in Nature where we tend to go generaly.

From Zero to Absolute Errors for Humanity

Suppose, we put 10 balls in an Urn and a person observes it as 10 balls at time 1. Now he goes off for an errand and someone removes 1 ball from it and at time 2 another observer comes over and counts the balls and says that there are 9 balls in it while the first observer comes over and says there are 10 balls in it. This means there is an error of 50%. Now the two observers leave for other errands and some one again removes 1 ball from it and at time 3 another observer comes and counts the ball as 8 while the other two says there are 9 or 10. Now the error of observation rise to 66%. This is called ‘response errors’, or Quantum Physicists calls it the ‘superposition fallacy’.

We all behave like this. An event observed by many, they will see it in different perspectives and meaning laid out by each will be different, which abstractly proves that there is nothing called ‘truth’ in nature only ‘reconstructions’.

The above curve is interesting since, as time moves forward and error increases asymptotically to 1 which is absolute error. We say that the error  increases as  the square root of time.

This is the predicament of human race, observational and interpretational errors can lead us into chaos and absolute rupture, which is our predicament. Concieving ‘just’ and ‘tolerant’ societies where ‘manifested errors’ is minimized is the solution, sine there is nothing called ‘absolute truth’ stated by Nitzche and Poper. Psychology also concurs stating that events occurring in geographically dislocated places cannot be correlated for decisions. Confirmity of behviore can be ascertained of any action by an individual by using the ‘Kelley criterion’ test in psychology.