Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  6 of 45 in Topic  Next >>
 
Industry : Law Functional Area : R&D
Activity:  8 comments  1477 views  last activity : 09 09 2010 06:10:08 +0000
 Refer 1275
Share
 
 
 

     I have written few articles earlier highlighting the significance of reforms in Indian Judiciary and where we stand. I want to again re-emphasize the importance of bringing proper reforms in judiciary and impact of proceeding with the present working status of our Judiciary. Everyone shows the rate of pendency of cases before various courts in India and everyone very frequently refers that "Justice delayed is nothing but justice denied". Even our constitutional court emphasizes the importance of reducing the pending cases before various courts. We have been mooting for the constitution of "Gram Nyayalays" now aiming at speedier relief to the general public when approach the court and also reducing the pendency. Looking at the statistics and if we think logically, if this "scheme of gram nayalays" are implemented as planned, we can be able to reduce the pendency, but, it may not be a permanent solution to the problem. The establishment of "Gram Nyayalays" may heal the wound to some extent, but, we are leaving the large extent of wound without any medicine and it certainly kills at one stage. We have seen great jurists, great judges and great advocates in the past and also at present. But, the involvement of legal professionals and senior advocates in reforming the system and also the society is gradually decreasing and its a dangerous trend. We have seen excellent jurists like Sri Palkiwala and Sri Seervai though we may differ with those people on certain issues. No one can ignore the basic structure theory and its impact. No one can ignore the intelligence of Sri Seervai and his commitment in writing the magnum opus, his simplicity, his determination and his involvement in profession and his activity when was in Bar. We have seen many such people in the past and their commitment. Indian Judiciary has done so much to the society. Everybody knows that the logic behind the doctrine of separation of powers is to maintain the required balance, so that, there will not be any arbitrariness in the course. But, the legislature and the executive dominate everywhere and the Judiciary remains as a tiger only on paper. Its surprising to note the recent events in Pakistan where Judiciary and the legal professionals have played a commendable role in preventing a danger to the societal structure. India is a biggest democratic country, and in democracy, the judiciary and press should have a major role and should be powerful. I don't think that our Judiciary and also the press is doing to the extent required. As I feel, our judiciary can only claim certain things like preventing the legislature in dominating other powers by passing a landmark judgment in breach of privileges case, expanding the scope of Part-III of Constitution, public interest litigations etc. When it comes to the role of press; yes, we have good and unbiased press or media even at present, but, what about the news papers, news channels that are closely associated with political parties playing a major role in feeding the information to the society.  All this, clearly shows that our judiciary is going backward and India can never say that it is being developed barring the growth in imports and exports, GDP, and outsourcing industry. It is for sure that only proper functioning of press and judiciary reflects the true development of any society or the state. Looking from that angle, I will not hesitate to say that India is still a backward nation needing many reforms and needing so much time to bring the system to a good track. But, I am an optimist and everything is possible as Barrack Obama making history becoming the president of United States of America.

     We have planned a good organizational set-up and we have a basic plan or document like Constitution of India. Each article and provision will be having a sound logic as everybody admits. What happens if there is no court? Then, there will not be any rule of law and it reflects our stonage. Now, what happens is that, in the absence of proper or reliable judiciary, the people will resort to other means or illegal means to settle their scores or getting their work done. As the people in the society believe that they will not get the justice through proper channel or established channel, they may resort to illegality at any cost and it spoils the entire society. Same is the case with press. Press is supposed to be unbiased and it is so powerful throughout the world. Press people are respected everywhere. Press is the good medium to keep a close watch on the system and focusing on the illegal things so those publics are fed with the right information and the needed reforms.

     But, unfortunately, we have gone so deep in into the problem and now we need so much time to turn the clock back. I have seen the few courts and how the proceedings are conducted in courts and professionals assist the court in the course. People will laugh at our Judiciary at times looking at the standards and we are admitted failed to preserve our glory and dignity. I have seen many legal professionals who can not even draft an adjournment application even after 10 years of practice. How come these people come out of Law College? How come we prevent this disqualified people to come into the profession after getting their degree? How come we expect the courts to deliver results speedily without the assistance of truly qualified professionals? How come we expect the judges to be highly competent where the word "competence in profession is under scrutiny". These are threatening issues and we need to address this on urgent basis.

    There are few people and professionals who say that there is no work in profession and money making is bit difficult. I disagree with this. There is lot of work which truly qualified professionals can do and our requirement is more and more. It is very difficult to find a truly reliable and qualified professional instantly and without much enquiry in metropolitan cities like Chennai and then what about the situation in other parts of the country and backward areas? Legal profession's glory and dignity is under danger and it is the collective responsibility of all the legal practitioners, privileged lawyers and senior advocates to moot for the reforms and think towards restoring the lost dignity.

     There are few lawyers and senior advocates who strive for change and work for restoring the lost dignity. Senior Advocates like Sri Sriram Panchu and Prashant Bhushan of Supreme Court are doing great things for change in the legal profession. I know that there may be many advocates and senior advocates are striving for the needed reforms intangibly.

     Legal professionals can do many things and with their proper involvement and work, Indian can definitely flourish. A legal professional is a social engineer having expertise on many issues at times. A legal professional can talk about software industry, factory procedures, business issues, accounts, medicine, politics and international scenario etc., the profession's very nature and its proved when look at our great Gandhi, Ambedkar, Nani Palkiwala, Chidamabaram, Arun Jaitly, Kapil Cibal, Bill Clinton and Barrack Obama etc.,

     So, it is the time to correct our legal profession and prove its dignity. Very highly dignified profession is under serious threat and its not good for society. I am not talking about the struggles of few professionals, but, I am talking about people and this society. I don't know where we are marching and what happens in future, but, be optimistic that better things will certain happen.  We need to concentrate alot on Research and Development and we need to make truly qualified graduates and professionals. We need to look at our educational sector and need to find out the mistakes in the system. Because, ultimately, "knowledge is power" and "strength only respects strength" as our great Kalam says.

Note:

     I have just expressed my feelings and my assessment may be wrong and I request the readers to come with good ideas and also work for the change.

 

 
8 comments on "Indian Judiciary - where are we?"
  Commented by  Mathew Cherian, Research Associate/Analyst, Western Michigan University    | 11 26 2009 11:39:02 +0000
Thanks Mr. Rao for your insight. India is a giant wheel that moves slowly than what the society needs most of the time. There is a discrepency between implementation and need for change. Faster growth of the society is not matched by symmetrical changes in the rules and processes, statuory or regulatory. This leads to changes geting dwarfed or fading away from the system as they appear and changes seldom occur.

When it comes to judiciary, we have no "discovery" process of speedier implementation. Discovery is slow and time consuming here compared to developed countries. The only advantage this provides is we never transforms into a litigating society. The drawback is changes gets slowed down which is visible in the way our infrastructure work for us. People pay taxes in the form of rent which in economic terms is 'social cost" which through statutes the citizen need be insulated from.

My suggestion is if discovery is made outside the court system then the processes can be speeded up and it helps the economy too. So the time of Attornys in the court can be reduced to just "summary judgements" when cases are either moot or has "stare decesis or common law" in nature or on answers there is sign of acceptance of guilt by difendents or facts pointing to relief from trial in many cases which is taken for long trials here in India. Many cases come to court when they are not even "ripe" enough for acceptance. So once these are filtered out I believe certain types of cases can be avoided in the first place relieving the judiciary of its valueble time and costs. There can even be filtering of the ripeness of cases at the Attorny level and from briefs presented in Courts which a junior Attorny or Court clerk trained enough can ascertain for jurisdiction.
In spite of these fundamental changes that need be added in our Judiciary, I believe our present system delivers quite efficient results for our culture which is not and has not been well endowed. Once we change our endowment pattern for citizen then changes are necessery.
  Commented by  Nagpal Singh, Sales and Business Development, Babel Group of companies    | 11 26 2009 04:08:40 +0000
very good one.... nice research and appraoch 
  Commented by  V.Durga Rao, Lawyer/Attorney, M/s Durga Rao & Associates    | 11 26 2009 02:01:44 +0000
I am very much impressed at the comment and understanding exposed by Sri Ramanatha Prabhu and also others.
  Commented by  RAMANATHA PRABHU N, Chartered Accountant    | 11 23 2009 12:38:47 +0000
In the present seanario of modern equipments and technology present system of delivering judgements by Hon'ble judges sitting within the four courners of court room is reaaly traditional, still pleedings by counsels presenting personally is being followed as if it was during early 1900's. It will be much more effective if it could change over to e-proceedure completely without being personally present, things can be done over e-filing proceedure to more speadier and effective. Right now e-filing proceedure is being followed only in supreme court that too not complete. All other subordinate courts according to me are not yet started even filing proceedure over electronic method. We have good Information Technology Act, but implimentation is not so good and effective especially in the system of Indian Judiciary. Now digital signatures are being used to sign soft documents which are generated out of electronic media to replace by present system of hard copy of judgements. If Government is able to provide a lap top and its know how to all judiciaries in India, and it is exploited effectively, according to me the present nature of denyal of justice by keeping in pending large number of cases at various levels in the judiciary system be brought to controle.  
  Commented by  Prasad PN, Consultant, Trainer    | 11 23 2009 09:00:00 +0000
We look westward for all our problems and refuse to adopt judicial reforms to speedup the delivery of justice. Instead of all cases being tried in courts from day one the cases should be taken up in arbitration councils, appellate and tribunals before reaching courts. The written submissions and replies etc can be completed offline and full documents should be ready before the court proceedings start. 

But the lawyers seems to be happy with present sad state of affairs where they enjoy and delays and customers suffer. Every reform is being opposed by court boycotts.

 
  Commented by  Shiuli Mukherji, Film Producer, Global Films Malaysia    | 11 23 2009 08:34:58 +0000
Mr.Rao, You have summarised the woeful state of Indian Judiciary and its incompetency so far. Even when implementing an amendment it takes zillions of years.
Judiciary of India as of today is the continuation of the British Legal system established by the English in the mid-19th century. Before the arrival of the Europeans, India was governed by laws based on The Arthashastra, dating from the 400 BC, and the Manusmriti from 100 AD.
Indian courts have large backlogs. For instance, the Delhi High Court has a backlog of 466 years according to its chief justice. This is despite the average processing time of four minutes and 55 seconds in the court.
Why have no amendments been passed on its traditional continuation of Legal System?
Why cannot Indian Judiciary practice summary courts? Even when the fact-finders  have come up with the facts which are applicable to the law.
  Commented by  suchita Ambardekar, Portfolio Manager, Tristate Medical Equipment India Pvt Ltd    | 11 23 2009 04:42:07 +0000
The issue you have raised are definately valid.....but most important is that....when justice....is delayed...and when common man....the AAM Admi...does not get justice......all this occur....

What ever the current blocks...status...failure of judiciary is....the first and most..important...is that comman man...is not getting justice...and is is being embroiled.in an unneccessary....time wait...or his fianacial status..is not getting him justice...when common man starts getting justice despite...the long wait....then only the change in judiciary system can occur.....

Judiciary is for the common man...AAM Admi......
  Commented by  Abraham Paul, Managing Director, FCOMNET- Future Groups    | 11 22 2009 08:11:29 +0000
In a healthier society, the disputes reaching courts should become less.  However, the society has become more complex, adding the instances leading to more court cases. In a democratic set up the process of law is bound to be slow. The crdibility of legal system in India is eroding especially in its service to the common man. Corruption in Judiciary is blamed for most the ills. Effective reforms in Judiciary is long overdue.  The CJI recently acknowledged that there is severe shortage courts and judicial mechanism in the country. 
Mr. Rao's article is an eye opener. Hope more like him will join hands to cause a ripple in helping out clean up and make the Indian Judiciary system more effective and efficient.  
Add your comment on "Indian Judiciary - where are we?"

Rate:
Submit
Leading Recruitment Firm
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
Viewers also viewed
We all know as to what happened to Ruchika's case and as to how powerful Rathore could get...
 
13 referals 9 comments, 1039 views
Whenever we talk about the delay in Courts and the solution, many will be in dilemma as to how...
 
0 referals 3 comments, 245 views
OUR WEAKNESS vs OUR STRENGHT
 
130 referals 11 arguments, 555 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (111)
India is ruled By Amma in south, Didi in east, Behen in north, Aunty in capital, Madam in center...
1951 referals 30 comments, 633 views
  One more vuxury car is here. Price : styarting from 14.12lakhs Available in 3 variants . The...
 
2331 referals 10 comments, 274 views
After two cardic arrests now Dawood is looking for a burial spot in Mumbai. He is one of the...
 
2157 referals 15 comments, 253 views
more...  
More From Author
Whenever we talk about the delay in Courts and the solution, many will be in dilemma as to how to deal with this issue comprehensively.  The issues highlighted by many, including public, professionals and the eminent judges, in my opinion, on...
Recently president of United States Barrack Obama has visited India and expressed his opinion that India has already ‘emerged’.  We, Indians, know as to the achievements made and things we need to still achieve. We have so many issues to deal...
When I was a student of law, I used to have thoughts in support of BJP and my thinking at that time was influenced by surroundings and especially the issue of reservations. I used to hear from my friends that the ability is not being recognized...
more...