|
|
||
|
Activity:
1 comments
282 views
last activity : 11 17 2010 09:19:51 +0000
|
||
|
|
INTRODUCTION TO
SEARCH ENGINES
WHAT YOU WILL LEARN
This is the first of many lessons in this course that will
address search engines. Search engines have extreme importance to Internet
marketers. In this lesson, we will introduce you to the general concepts and
point out the popular search engines. Subsequent lessons will deal with
individual search engines and more detailed information.
WHAT IS A SEARCH ENGINE?
When people look for things of interest to them on the
Internet, they go to search engines and directories. A directory is a listing
of category subject headings with Websites listed under the specific
categories. You browse through (often called "drilling down") the
categories until you find what you are looking for. Search engines, on the
other hand, have a form in which you input keywords, and pages of results are
displayed. The results are lists of Websites that pertain to the keywords you
have used.
Search engines seek out and index Websites on the Internet
according to keywords. When a user types a search phrase, a search engine scans
its database and returns a list of successful matches to the request.
WHICH SEARCH ENGINES ARE IMPORTANT?
According to Nielsen//NetRatings, as of the date of this
writing, search engine popularity within the top 25 online properties is as
follows, with the most popular listed first:
Yahoo!, Google, Lycos, Go.com, Excite, InfoSpace, and Ask
Jeeves.
HotBot, which has always been a very popular search engine,
is now part of the Terra Lycos Network. Other search engines worth noting but
not presently in the top 25 online properties are Northern Light and LookSmart.
Thus, although there are thousands of search engines, you
can narrow your main focus down to just those mentioned above, as they receive the
overwhelming majority of all search engine traffic.
The "reach" of a search engine is usually defined
as the percentage of all Web users who visit the site at least once a month.
Services, such as Nielsen//NetRatings, also periodically release statistics on
the current reach of a search engine.
Another factor by which to judge a search engine is the
percentage of Web pages it has indexed. Even the most comprehensive search
engine was aware of no more than 16% of the estimated 800 million pages on the
Web, according to a study published in the July 8, 1999, scientific journal
Nature.
"The amount of information being indexed (by commonly
used search engines) is increasing, but it's not increasing as fast as the
amount of information that is being put on the Web," according to Steve
Lawrence, a researcher at NEC Research Institute in
Even the pages that do end up indexed take an average of six
months to be discovered by the search engines, according to the study. That
study was a long time ago in "Internet time." The situation is much
worse today. Thus, you can not wait for the search engines to find your site.
You have to submit it to them.
THINKING LIKE A SEARCH ENGINE
By now we hope you have noticed a theme running throughout
the Internet Income Course. When we discuss recruiting affiliates, we ask you
to think from the perspective of the prospects you are targeting. When we
discuss selling products, we ask you to think from the perspective of the
potential consumer. When we discuss contacting Webmasters to place your ads on
their sites, we ask you to think from the Webmasters' perspective. When we
discuss spam, we ask you to think from the perspective of the e-mail
recipients. Now, as we begin to discuss search engines, we are going to ask you
to think from the perspective of the search engine operators.
Take a few minutes and pretend that you are starting your
own search engine. Say it is back in the mid 1990's and you want to establish
your site as one of the popular search engines on this new fantastic Internet.
You are going to take your company public and retire as a zillionaire! What
would be important to you? How would you make that happen? You would certainly
want your database to include all of the important, valuable Websites on the
Internet. You would also want a comprehensive list of all the other
not-so-great sites on the Internet as well. You would want your visitors to be
able to efficiently find just what they want among those sites when they search
your engine. You would want the most useful, valuable, high-quality sites to
come up first in the list, followed by the less useful sites. You would want
the most relevant sites to show up first, followed by the less relevant sites
in the search results.
Say you start your index of Websites and for each entry you
have a field for "site name," "site description,"
"site URL (address)," and "keywords." When visitors search
from your search engine, they will input search words or phrases and then be
led to sites pertaining to those words or phrases. Again, you want the most
useful, valuable sites to come up first in the results. How would you
accomplish this?
Let's say, for example, that one of the visitors to your
search engine has to write a report on the planet Saturn for a class he is
taking. He types in the keyword "Saturn." When your engine searches
through its index of keywords, it will pull up sites that discuss the planet
Saturn, but it will also pull up sites that deal with the automobile named
Saturn, the Saturn Sega game system, the comic strip character named Sailor
Saturn, perhaps a rock band named Saturn's Rings, and maybe even a porn star
who goes by the nickname Saturn (provided you have not taken steps to filter
out porn sites).
These diverse results are to be expected. What you do not
want, however, is for a number of business opportunity sites, credit card
sites, long-distance service sites, and porn sites (at least those that don't
have stars named Saturn) to come up also. If those sites come up under a search
for Saturn, then your search engine is not very efficient and your visitors
will become frustrated and quit using your search engine. (If your visitor
loses valuable time needed to write his report on the planet Saturn while
plowing through all of these other non-relevant sites, he or she will find
another search engine to use next time. If this happens often, there goes your
zillion dollars!) You also want a means to identify the most valuable sites and
rank them to come up first in the results. So, what you realize is that you
need a means to exclude irrelevant sites and to rank relevant sites according
to their value. The better you do these things, the more people will like your
search engine and the more successful it will be.
The first thing you have to figure out as a search engine
operator is how to associate keywords with sites. You will not have time to
examine all the sites on the Internet and write keywords for them. You will
either have to create a program that can read sites and make the keywords for
them, or you will have to get the site publishers to do that themselves. There
are at least two ways that you can get the sites' Webmasters to do this. One
(employed by Yahoo!) is to make the Webmaster submit keywords in the process of
submitting their site to your engine. This does not work for the
"spider" engines, which go out and find the pages themselves,
however. Since you want as many sites on your engine as possible, you do not
want to wait for the Webmasters to submit them. You want to go out and find
them. What you could do is support a standard whereby a certain meta tag
included in the HTML code of all Web pages contains the keywords the Webmaster
thinks are appropriate for his or her site. That is indeed what has happened.
HTML supports the meta tag keywords for that very purpose.
When knowledgeable Webmasters build their Websites, they use
the meta tag keywords on each page and insert the relevant keywords for that
page. The tag looks like this:
<META Name="keywords" Content="saturn,
planet, planets, planetary, solar system, astronomy">
Thus, when your search engine indexes sites, it
automatically grabs the keywords from the keyword meta tag, and you are good to
go. . . Or, are you? What if the Webmasters cheat when coding in their
keywords?
Why would Webmasters want to cheat, and how would they go
about doing so? Let's switch gears away from our Saturn example for a moment to
explore these questions. Although the statistics are now changing, over the
last several years the Internet has been used mostly by young men. Thus, the
"hot" search terms—the ones most frequently searched for on the
search engines—have been things of interest to young males. Because of this, as
you might expect, search terms relating to sex and nudity, rock music, famous
female stars, and outlaw-type sites (called "warez sites") have been
high on the list of popular search terms. Some Webmasters have kept themselves
aware of the current popular search terms and used them in their keywords, even
though they may not be relevant to their Website. They do this to increase the
probability of their site showing up in a search and, therefore, to increase
their traffic.
Currently, one of the most popular search terms is
"Britney Spears." It may occur to a Webmaster of a business opportunity
site that if he adds "Britney Spears" to his keywords, he will
increase traffic to his page and perhaps get more signups. But, as a search
engine operator, you would have a problem with this Webmaster. You want your
search engine visitors to find the pages they are looking for. If some young
man is looking for a page discussing Britney Spears and finds business
opportunity sites, your search engine has not done a good job. The young man,
being unhappy, will take his search engine business elsewhere (so to speak) and
your search engine will lose popularity. Thus, as a search engine operator, you
are at cross purposes with these Webmasters who want to cheat with their
keywords. Because you want that zillion dollar retirement, you are dang sure
going to figure out ways to deal with them.
Now let's return to our "Saturn" example and say
that a space probe launched by the
The various search engines do exactly that in various ways.
Search engine operators are constantly trying to improve their means of
detecting such cheating. They closely guard the algorithms they use to do this
as industrial secrets because if they become widely known, people will find
ways around them.
When search engines detect people cheating, they can exclude
the page from the search engine (and even any future submissions from the same
person or company), give it a very low overall ranking, or give it a low or
non-existent ranking with respect to the offending keywords.
Since we are never going to know with certainty how the
search engines actually go about detecting keyword relevance and ranking sites,
at least at any particular point in time, all we can do is imagine that we are
the search engine operator and think how we would go about doing those things.
Thinking again like a search engine operator, how would you
go about detecting keyword relevance? One thing you would soon realize is that
you do not want to throw the baby out with the bath water. That is, you would
realize that by only looking to see if the keywords show up in the actual
content of the site and assuming that cheating has occurred if the words do
not, you will exclude some very relevant, very valuable sites. This, too, would
be bad for you as a search engine operator.
There are many legitimate situations where a keyword may not
be repeated in the actual content of the site. Say a Webmaster has a regional
site which provides news and current activities for a three county area
commonly known among people in the region as the "River Basin Area"
or perhaps the "Wiregrass Area" or some similar term. Say the three
counties are
Since you cannot afford to pay someone to sit and look at
all of the millions of pages submitted to your engine in person, you will have
to develop some algorithm that will do this task as best it can be done without
human intervention. Clearly, it's not going to be extremely accurate. It would
be far too difficult to write a program sophisticated enough to figure out all
the different variations of relevant keywords. Most likely, you will have to
settle for doing it on some statistical bases. Say, for example, you decide
that if 90% of the keywords actually appear on the site, then that's close
enough. The other 10% could be cheating or it could simply be legitimate
oversight like the River Basin Area example above. You may have to settle for
that margin of error. On top of that, you could look for certain keywords that suggest
cheating and deal with them separately. You could try to develop algorithms
which judge whether the keywords which do appear in the content are actually in
context or just thrown in to fool the search engines. Whatever means is
actually employed, it is a constant struggle between the aggressive Webmasters
who would manipulate the search engines and the search engine operators who
want to keep their search engines effective.
SITE DESCRIPTION
In addition to keywords, there is also a meta tag standard
for the site description. This is where the Webmaster provides a description of
the site which can appear in the search engine listing. We will discuss this in
another lesson.
RANKING VALUE
In addition to producing search results containing sites
that are relevant to the search terms used, search engine operators also want
to place the most valuable sites high in the results list, leaving the less
valuable sites for the end of the list. They want the people who use their
search engine to find high-quality sites first.
Thus, as a search engine operator, you will want to find
means to evaluate the quality and value of sites submitted. How would you go
about this? Here are a few things you might consider. Check the HTML code of
the submitted pages for errors. If the code contains errors, it is a signal
that few resources were put into the site or else the Webmaster is less than
knowledgeable. If the Webmaster is less than professional is his coding, he may
also have been less than professional with the content. Check to see the number
of other sites which link to this site. If there are many sites out there
linking to this site, obviously some human beings have looked at it and
determined that it has some value. You may also want to consider the quality
ranking of the sites which link to it. If known high-quality sites are linking
to it, it probably is a high-quality site itself. You may also want to look at
the number of outgoing links from the site and see where they go. There is
probably some ratio of links to volume of text content that is characteristic
of high-quality sites. The quality of the pages linked to is also a factor. You
would also want to look at how long the site has been at the same address. Many
sites come and go. The fact that a site lasts is an indication of its quality.
Thus, you will need to revisit the ranking of the sites on your engine from
time to time to revaluate these factors. Simple things like the amount of
content on a site and whether it has its own domain name would also be important.
CONCLUSION
As a Webmaster or an affiliate doing Internet marketing,
search engines are important to you. Set aside some time to spend thinking like
a search engine operator. Think of other things that would be important to you
in evaluating keyword relevancy and judging the value of sites. Then
incorporate all of these things into your Web pages. While you can never really
know the true current search engine secrets, you can use your common sense and
imagination to design Websites that would be favorably evaluated and ranked by
you if you were the search engine operator. That should go a long way toward
having your pages favorably evaluated and ranked by the real search engines.
My Websites: http://www.rashmi.biz
http://www.freewebs.com/mattu01
My Blogs: http://www.intenet-business-resources.blogspot.com/
http://strongfutureinternational.ning.com/
http://realitynetworker.ning.com/
Join me on: http://www.moreinfo247.com/EE
https://www.moreinfo247.com/9106094.3101/WYK
http://www.reality-networkers.com/marketingsecret6.php?refid=1623633
Manohar Mattu,
SFI BTL,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, will take care in future |
The New Economy The New Economy And Why Home-Based Entrepreneurs Should Be Excited About It Finding stability in the midst of chaos 100 years ago—even 60 years ago—many, many more people than now lived and worked in the same neighborhoods,... |
