Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 
Posted in Community :

IPO underwriting

 
Industry : Investment Banking Functional Area : Movers & Shakers
Activity:  2 comments  332 views  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:04 +0000
 Refer 20
Share
 
 
 

Now that SEBI has made it compulsory for companies to get a rating for their public issues, rating agencies like CRISIL, CARE, Fitch and ICRA are soon going to find themselves being blamed for investors losses. From now on, anyone who loses money on an IPO will try to pass the buck to the raters, whose fault it is. Not just blame for losses, if your neighbour makes more money on a company rated '2' than you do on a company rated '4', then too, you'll know whom to blame. Which is a pity, because used properly, the IPO rating can be a useful tool for investors.

Despite the fact that disclosure norms have improved, the sheer volume and complexity of IPO disclosures means that it needs serious time and application to learn to understand them. This is something that few investors can do. The idea behind the ratings appears to be that IPO prospectuses are too complex for lay investors to read and a rating given by a rating agency can be a guide. SEBI states that this rating is 'a service aimed at facilitating the assessment of equity issues offered to public. The grade assigned to any individual issue represents a relative assessment of the 'fundamentals' of that issue in relation to the universe of other listed equity securities in India.' SEBI has pointed out that this rating is not a buy or sell recommendation.

I think the best by-product of these ratings could be that the kind of companies who are likely to get a 1 or 2 rating may not show up in the IPO bazaar at all. However, the rating process is not expected to include any forensic work so if someone is faking or hiding information then that's not going to get caught.

Ideally, I wish IPO ratings were not needed at all but given the actual state of stock investing this is a positive development. My opinion is that if done properly, IPO ratings could develop not into a good preference indicator, but a useful avoidance indicator. That is, investors should use them more as a way of avoiding bad companies rather than selecting good ones.

Have your views over this. Just comment in you views, doubts, questions etc.

 
TrackBack URL:
2 comments on "IPO Rating Made Compulsory"
  Commented by  ashish arora, Assistant Professor, GNDU    | 04 22 2008 10:31:01 +0000
I think this is rather a much awaited step from SEBI. It is quite needed that not every issue should be allowed to fraud the investors. Issues getting less than 2 rating ona scale of 5 shouldnt be allowed. Hence, only the good ssues will be available. I think RPL fiasco requires that companies with low bottomlines & no business should be out rated. Let us make stock market a place for wise investing practices
  Commented by  Shakti Singh Shekhawat, Analyst, Large MNC    | 01 31 2008 21:52:26 +0000
what is the role of sebi in governing stock markets ?
Add your comment on "IPO Rating Made Compulsory"

Rate:
Submit
Leading Recruitment Firm
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
Viewers also viewed
THE  GENERAL APPREHENSION OF THE CONSUMER IS THAT THE ONLY ASSURED SAVING INCOME WILL BECOME A...
 
0 referals 4 arguments, 189 views
Yes vs No
 
330 referals 76 arguments, 1904 views
"Tell me and I will forget, show me and I may remember, involve me and I will understand," -...
 
1548 referals 70 arguments, 1142 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (95)
The following is a reproduction of from an article I wrote in 2004. 1.  Harnessing the vast...
 
735 referals 18 comments, 325 views
No 1: India Since 1991, when economic liberalization unshackled India from the slow rate of...
 
202 referals 5 comments, 85 views
The word 'Push' has traditionally characterized FMCG sales systems in India. This is changing...
 
11 referals 5 comments, 625 views
more...