Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 
Posted in Community :

Valuation: What matters?

 
Industry : Hedge Funds/VCs/Private Equity Functional Area : Valuation
Activity:  0 comments  97 views  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:04 +0000
 Refer 11
Share
 
 
 
 Buyout barons are many things, but they are not fools, and they are not generally first off the mark in offering to give up their own tax privileges. So what are we to make of the Damascene conversion the private equity industry seems to have undergone over 'taper relief', which allows multi-millionaire partners in big firms to get away with paying tax at just 10 per cent? And why on earth would top executives, including Sir Ronald Cohen, an adviser to Gordon Brown, bound into print admitting the regime is unfair?

Call me cynical, but I suspect the industry hopes that if it concedes on taper relief, then some of the other issues dogging it will go away. Taper relief, which enables a tycoon to pay a lower rate of tax than a nurse or a cleaner, is a potent symbol for the anger felt by many at private equity and its practitioners. Reform on that score would be good news and should rub out an offensive blot on our supposedly progressive tax system. But let's not get too carried away. Gordon Brown has shown himself reluctant to rein back the benefits he himself has bestowed on the industry and is only doing so now under pressure from the unions.

His past form suggests it would be a good idea for the GMB to give careful scrutiny to the Treasury's proposals for reforming taper relief when they emerge, as the chances of a whitewash are high. The suggestion is that the 10 per cent rate will be raised to 20 per cent, but there is an argument that these gains should be classed as income and taxed at 40 per cent.

The Treasury select committee probing private equity wiped the floor with the British Venture Capital Association last week, but faces tougher opponents on Tuesday, including industry heavy-hitters such as Permira's Damon Buffini. But it should not be placated by the moves on taper relief

Also Private Equity Funds are getting hot now-a-days. Valuation of transactions has become important.

With so much money pouring into private equity funds, competitors for deals are able to match one another easily when it comes to price. Clearly, valuation remains the most important part of any transaction, but in today's capital-soaked private equity environment, bidders must also come up with other, less tangible ways to set themselves apart.

Bob Frost, a managing director at Piper Jaffray who specializes in advising clients in middle-market mergers and acquisition transactions, says bidders compete on three elements of every deal: value, timing and certainty.

"Value is value, and people have become very aggressive [about it], particularly for high quality assets," he says. "As for timing and certainty, that's probably where firms can differentiate themselves at the margin. We certainly are seeing an environment where you can differentiate yourself in the auction process by putting yourself in a position to move very quickly and create a timeline for the seller that fundamentally gets them to a close more quickly."

To do that, he says, companies need to pull together enough resources to front-load much of the due diligence process. To the seller, that translates into greater certainty. "Sellers are focused on making sure they move forward with parties that they are highly confindent will close the deal," says Frost.

He adds that industry expertise and specific experience in the sector, or related sectors, along with a private equity firm's track record, also can lead to raising a seller's comfort level with an individual bidder. "In an auction environment, often it's the case that sellers are looking at values that are comparable, and they're really trying to pick a partner based on their understanding of the business and their understanding of the risks."

 
TrackBack URL:
0 comments on "Private Equity Bidding Wars: When Capital-rich Funds Compete, Intangibles Win the Deal"
Add your comment on "Private Equity Bidding Wars: When Capital-rich Funds Compete, Intangibles Win the Deal"

Rate:
Submit
 
Viewers also viewed
Power consumption increases in summer and then we see power crisis. Every time there is power...
 
510 referals 13 arguments, 282 views
Which is better ULIP or Mutual Funds?
 
25 referals 27 arguments, 2873 views
India Infoline offers life time free demat and trading account just pay Rs.555 at the time of...
 
0 referals 3 comments, 254 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (63)
UPA Relief on 2G Case The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government got some major relief on...
 
320 referals 14 comments, 119 views
Accounting of revenues costs in Entertainment Ind. 13 May 2010 2,927 views No Comment   A common...
 
0 referals 1 comments, 286 views
Recovery of its due has been a hectic exercise for the Banks in the absence of a special...
 
1 referals 1 comments, 0 views
more...  
More From Author
Twigmore is a new app on facebook, a start up which focuses on Travel and friends, i.e., it will recommend traveling to the destinations your friends and their friends have traveled. This is because they bellieve that while most of the travel...
I second MR.Saket jain here. There is no monopoly in any field if we take the global prospective.
Budding business owners should go virtual wherever and whenever possible. In a fledgling startup, the last thing you need to worry about is excessive infrastructure or expensive overhead. It’s already a difficult enough task to generate income...
more...