Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  9 of 45 in Topic  Next >>
Posted in Community :

Business and Law

 
Industry : Law Functional Area : India
Activity:  3 comments  184 views  last activity : 01 09 2012 09:11:01 +0000
Share
 
 
 

From 15th June 2011 Every Advocate shall be entitled as of right to practice before any court in India including Supreme Court.

Section 30 of the Act says: “Subject to the provisions of this Act, every advocate shall be entitled as of right to practise throughout the territories to which this Act extends; in all courts including the Supreme Court; before any tribunal or person legally authorised to take evidence; and before any other authority or person before whom such advocate is by or under any law for the time being in force entitled to practise.

Earlier, the Supreme Court in Aeltemesh Rein vs. Union of India and others [AIR 1988 SC 1768] had issued a writ of mandamus to the Central Government to consider, within six months, whether Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 should be brought into force or not. The Court, however, held that it was the discretion of the Central Government to bring this section in force by issuing a notification in this behalf. In spite of the direction of the Supreme Court, the section has not been brought in force hence advocates cannot practice as of right.

Advocates for the last so many years have been claiming the right to practice in all courts as of right and have been agitating for the enforcement of Section 30 of the Act in this behalf. Almost 50 years have passed since enactment of the Act, the provision has not been brought into force.For some reasons this Section remained in the Statute without being notified.  

 
3 comments on "Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961"
  Commented by  Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.    | 01 09 2012 09:11:01 +0000
This is a good provision.  In Telangana, the  advocates of the region  instigated by the local politicians are agitating against the advocates of other regions asking them to stay from appearing in High court and other courts in Telangana region alleging that their practice is being taken away by the advocates of other regions of the state.  This is the best example to say the reasons why the Sec. 30 of the advocates Act is not being implemented till date.
  Commented by  Peeyush Chauhan, Associate/Sr. Associate -(Technical)    | 01 09 2012 04:48:37 +0000
Still in some of the courts like family court, lawyers are not allowed to practice their own on the pretext that only the respective state Govt is authoried to appoint lawyers for family courts. Many litigation are currently pending the courts against the same. The judiciary must take the cognizance su moto on the issue since the matter affecting the statutory rights of the lawyers enshrined u/s 30 Advocates act 1961.  
  Commented by  S. Muralidharan, Head, Project Planning/Strategy, Knowledge Foundation    | 07 28 2011 14:37:36 +0000
This is a good provision Mr. Tekale.  This will reduce litigant's expenditure to a great extent, and the same advocates would be kept if remedy is sought from Higher Courts! 
Add your comment on "Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961"

Rate:
Submit
Part of Randstad, the world’s second largest HR services company
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
Viewers also viewed
A devil's advocate is someone who argues against an idea, position, or cause for the sake of...
 
16 referals 1 comments, 96 views
One explanation of the same can be that it is not the class divide that is causing...
 
190 referals 33 arguments, 501 views
Criminals and Politicians vs Common Public
 
0 referals 7 arguments, 83 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (73)
Floods deluge Pak With Strategic Problems   The Zardari government's inefficient handling of the...
 
35 referals 2 comments, 47 views
Why China And India Don't Get Along January 4, 2011: India-China ties are set to enter...
 
98 referals 3 comments, 108 views
India-Iran Drama Continues If Iran really was behind the February 13 attack  on an Israeli...
 
98 referals 4 comments, 72 views
more...  
More From Author
No politician or senior officer ever goes to jail despite huge evidence  because Anti Corruption Branch (ACB) and CBI directly come under the government. Before starting investigation or initiating prosecution in any case, they have to take...
Thanks for referral in addition to what is stated by MS_Pi i like to add some more details.   1.whether hindu, muslim will depend upon the applicable act. 2.provisions under the partnership deed are relevant. 3.Article of association is relevant.
Ishwar alla tere nam sabko sanmati de bhagwan.
more...