COIMBATORE KRISHNARAO PRAHALAD, universally known as C.K., was the most creative management thinker of his generation. He revolutionised thinking on two big subjects, business strategy and economic development, and made a significant contribution to a third, innovation. His admirers were legion, including bosses of some of the world’s biggest companies, heads of NGOs and founders of scrappy start-ups.
Mr Prahaladburst onto the management scene with two path-breaking articles in the Harvard Business Review, “Strategic Intent” (1989) and “The Core Competence of the Corporation” (1990), and a bestselling book, “Competing for the Future” (1996), all co-written with his former pupil, Gary Hamel. “Core competence” remains one of the most frequently reprinted articles ever published by Harvard Business Review.
Mr Prahalad shifted the focus of strategic thinking dramatically. He believed firms should seek not simply to position themselves well within their existing markets but to capitalise on their advantages to redefine markets in their favour. That, he argued, involves identifying and developing strengths, such as logistics or miniaturisation, that cannot easily be imitated by competitors. Firms should then “stretch” those skills to the maximum, setting themselves ambitious and industry-transforming goals, and using those goals to galvanise their workers. He cited a long list of successful Japanese companies, such as Sony, Canon and Komatsu, which had done just that.
Mr Prahalad was particularly struck by the ability of these firms to harness the ideas of their humbler employees. And, later in his career, he became increasingly fascinated by innovation. He argued that company-centric innovation was giving way to “co-creation”, in which firms collaborate with their customers and business allies. He also shifted his attention to the legion of small businesses that were redefining the corporate world.
This led him to veer off in a radically new direction—and to produce perhaps his most thought-provoking book. “The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits” (2004) was a counterblast against two types of intellectual laziness: that of corporate titans who were ignoring the bulk of humanity and that of humanitarians who regarded profit as a dirty word. He argued that the world’s poor represented trillions of dollars’ worth of pent-up spending power. And he demonstrated that a legion of innovative companies in the developing world, including several in his native India, were learning how to turn these people into paying customers.
His impatience led to one of the few failures of Mr Prahalad’s otherwise gravity-defying career. In 2000 he co-founded a software company, Praja, which was meant to act as a test bed for his ideas, particularly his commitment to bringing information to ordinary people. Instead, it ate up millions of his own dollars and was sold off two years later. He concluded that he was no good at the “blocking and tackling” that fills most managers’ days.
But then Mr Prahalad’s core competence lay in big ideas rather than in dotting the “i”s and crossing the “t”s. He taught the world’s biggest companies to think of themselves a new, as a “portfolio of competencies” rather than as a “portfolio of businesses”. He taught everyone to see the developing world not as an also-ran but as a vortex of innovation and creativity. The world of management theory has more than its fair share of charlatans, but C.K. Prahalad was the genuine article.
I only feel that an idea can not work in every field even if it is tested successfully in one, however good & strong it is.
As a management faculty in Risk Management, I for one feel that one must go where one is accepted & where it works,Trying new avenues for your ideas is welcome, but risk taking. Too much of risk taking is leaning towords gambling.
see the issues with any emerging com in india is that they want to concentrate on metroes first then to upcountry n 3rd tier cities.
but according to me its vice versa first start from up country market and then go to major cities, defenatly depends on the products but its better to secure boarders and then fight inside them.
Prof. Prahalad was a thinker in his field and has produced some wonderful ideas. The last big statement which I appreciated much a few months before his demise, was 'what India lacks is good leadership !! "
Wish him peaceful rest.
I agree with Burli sahab! There has to be a semblance in taking risks and the risks need to be taken with a view that they wouldnt harm the process or the systems in the long run.
Exploring newer markets or even identifying markets for launch should be done with an idea of calculated risk parameters with damage control plugged in. Emotions should not rule the market sensibility but the head should dictate the way forward. The environment has to accept you not because you are dashing but because you have a right to be there!! Brilliat info Purvi.
Thanks for the referral Ms.Purvi Ghose.
really it is a good piece of information.
The thought provoking ideas are:
to redefine the market in their favour
to harness the ideas of the employees
eradicating poverty through profits and
portfolio of competencies rather than portfolio of business.
The today corporate companies could try on those lines and I hope it will yield to a greater extent.
I only feel that an idea can not work in every field even if it is tested successfully in one, however good & strong it is.
As a management faculty in Risk Management, I for one feel that one must go where one is accepted & where it works,Trying new avenues for your ideas is welcome, but risk taking. Too much of risk taking is leaning towords gambling.
Many brands become stagnant and then they die. What to do if you want to give it a new start ? Relaunching a brand can be difficult so what should be the first few steps in doing so ? Same can be applicable to other brands too which are not dead...
Indians are yet to explore a lot in internet world. While we get everything we want from stores near our homes but shopping from home is a different experience. I have seen that finding a product online in india is a bit difficult and it take...