Create knowledge
[?]
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes then Why
|
9
|
VS |
2
|
No they Why
|
 |
Subrahmanya Gupta Boda
| Argues in support of
"No they Why"
| 2 years ago
|
|
Testing is surly part of Software Development Life Cycle. However the focus is on development in SDLC. STLC details testing activities/tasks independent / aligned with SDLC. Ex. A team could use STLC to test software at any point in time,...
|
|
 |
RAMESH KANDADAI
| Argues in support of
"Yes then Why"
| 2 years ago
|
|
SDLC has many aspects to it....These aspects form subset of the superset of SDLC. Amongst them Testing Life cycle focusses exclusively on the testing aspect. This kind of identification of subset life cycles has been developed to promote...
|
|
Debate: "Is Testing Life Cycle is a Subset of SDLC ?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Bugzilla
|
5
|
VS |
2
|
Mantis
|
 |
Manish Soni
| Argues in support of
"Bugzilla"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Bugzilla is better than mentis. The main reason which described that Bugzilla is better than Mentis, In Bugzilla CVS (Concurrent Version Control System) facility is there. In Mentis there is nothing like that either CVS or VSS. If we need...
|
|
 |
Ajit Lal
| Argues in support of
"Mantis"
| 2 years ago
|
|
The choice of any Bug Tracking tool depends on project to project needs and accordingly which tool to choose depends accordingly (forget the freeware/license factor). e.g, Some maintenance projects requires a lot of past bugs to refer/tracking,...
|
|
Debate: "Which one is the best Defect Tracking Tool? Bugzilla or Mantis." deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Manual Testing more beneficial
|
42
|
VS |
20
|
Automated Testing more beneficial
|
 |
Aniket Kumar
| Argues in support of
"Automated Testing more beneficial"
| 1 year ago
|
|
as far as possible testing large scale products manually will kill a lot of time. and in the mean while we have to do all our work in time so trying automated testing will save time , cost and also increase production . but still technology has...
|
|
|
|
Manish Soni
| Argues in support of
| 3 years ago
|
|
Manual testing is necessary before going for automation. Because in automation testing first of all we have to select the test cases of that application which is going to be automated. If application is stable and there is no issue with the test cases...
|
|
 |
Diptanjan Mukherjee
| Argues in support of
"Manual Testing more beneficial"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Both are important in it's own place. Before any automated testing one round of manual testing is recomemded to filter out the basic bugs. More over Manual Testing is followed in more places in this industry.
|
|
Debate: "Manual Testing vs Automated Testing" deleted from your view.
Follow me on
