Create knowledge
[?]
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
9
|
VS |
5
|
No
|
 |
Navnath K. Bodke
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 2 years ago
|
|
yes, we can replace animal studies with in-vitro studies but there are limitations like we can not test antiepileptic effects or antipsychotic effect. all we can do it that try to reduce the use of animals for that we should knpw the 4R consept
|
|
|
|
Anindya Basu
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 3 years ago
|
|
I agree that ATC techniques has made tremendous advances in the recent past, even chip technologies have been devised to evaluate the drug actions, however, the simulation of the entire body using these techniques is still far away at the present...
|
|
|
|
Agalya Priyadarshni.K
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Well ACC techniques are a boon in clinical reaearch. Reasons include: 1. Animal usage for testing is reduced though cannot be completely avoided. 2. Provide a platform for preliminary testings of the drug so that confirmed effective drugs in the...
|
|
Debate: "Invitro testing - Can they replace animal testing?." deleted from your view.
Follow me on
