Create knowledge
[?]
|
(rate this)
|
|
Favour
|
15
|
VS |
10
|
Opposition
|
 |
Ajay Ziz
| Argues in support of
"Opposition"
| 2 years ago
|
|
patent right knowledge which forces us to think that it's in the genes . question should knowlege :: which :::
|
|
 |
Manoj Kr Kalita
| Argues in support of
"Favour"
| 2 years ago
|
|
In response to Kurian I wanna tel we human beings always work for money. You wont continue your job if that does not pay you. If we human beings are like commodoities who get sold for money why not the genes prepared by some scientist after their...
|
|
 |
Nimmi P Babu
| Argues in support of
"Favour"
| 3 years ago
|
|
almost anything biological must now be patentable, to ensure future medical discoveries and a competitive biotechnology industry. For many religious and environmental groups, this is a misleading exaggeration at best. At worst, it reduces nature...
|
|
Debate: "SHOULD WE PATENT GENES?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
Biotechnology V/s Intellectual Property Intellectual Property is the term used to describe the branch of law, which protects the application of thoughts, ideas, and information, which are of commercial value. It thus covers the law relating to patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and other similar rights (Cornish, 1989). MODERN BIOTECHNOLOGY -- or 'biological engineering,' as some have called it -- has excited the imaginations and provoked the concerns of almost every part of society Biotechnology companies and much of the mass media tout advances in modern biotechnology as little less than miraculous. The new techniques of engineering life are said to be responsible for two r...
|
|
venkataramana karapakula
| Commented
| 3 months ago
|
|
hallo , me also working in IP. my background is biotechnoly.If u find any vacancy in your organisation, pls refer me
|
|
Insight: "Biotechnology V/s Intellectual Property" deleted from your view.
Follow me on
