| Topic : construction managment and construction equipment |
|
|
Construction Planning & Management
|
|
Activity:
Question posted: 08 24 2009 04:18:25 +0000,
9 answers, 318 views, last activity
07 06 2010 20:18:08 +0000
|
|
construction equipments
Most of the middle group contractors are doing this ,during no or less work period they hires the t&p ,equipments to similar and more small contractors,thus they earn at least something after deducting pol of particular equipment.
But the big construction company don't go for hiring of m.c's and this due to showmanship of being big company,I have seen it and writting with experience.
Generally the big compnays by the equipment and hire small petty contractors on labour rates.This exercise is carried out to avoid unnecessary labour wastage,now the supervisors just need to provide adequate front ant get the work done in good quality.Such practice is also adopted if the supervisors are not competant to get the work executed in economical manner.
In case if efficient staff is there there is no need to hire contractors for petty work.But now a days efficient & honest supervisors / Engineers are the in endangered species , can be seen at very rare places.
Well as i understand the question it is regarding eqipment being stipulated for hire in contracts. It will definetly bring down the cost of work as equipment is used economically. Equipment owner can make proper resource planning in such a way so that equipment is used at different sites as per requirement. For example if design mix concrete is to be provided in four different work packages. Four Batching plants are to be installed and four concrete pumps are to be procured and four transit mixers are to be proucured and if work belongs to one owner it is possible to install one batching plant of bigger capacity.one concrete pump and at the most two transit mixers. By phasing construction all work can be completed in the same period. This way investment on eqipment is reduced and construction cost is reduced. As far NTPC like organisation are concerened equipment is not procured to save capital cost of project as recurring works may not be required to done at same project site and transportation and installation cost is also more of heavy equipment. Again selection of eqipment will depend upon quatum of work items like eartkwork concreting to be done.
i mean by this query that company like Jindal power generally award the total contract of erection and construction to various vendors. the machineries are in their scope. many a times the work suffers in absence of machineries to be brought by these agencies. if jindal keeps the vital construction equipments in site and mention this in the contract in the beginning then the price will be less as well as the work suffering on account of these machines will not happen. But this is not follwed on the owner side. In NTPC also no machinery is kept by the company and work have suffered because of cranes etc. What is the opinion of owner companies in this regards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i mean by this query that company like Jindal power generally award the total contract of erection and construction to various vendors. the machineries are in their scope. many a times the work suffers in absence of machineries to be brought by these... |
A construction company buys the construction equipments and hires the contractors , how it will work? |