|
|
Activity:
Question posted: 01 27 2010 12:49:04 +0000,
10 answers, 1635 views, last activity
01 21 2012 17:34:03 +0000
|
|
|
|
I have witnessed this & learnt from a Sr. banker that its against RBI guidelines.
Is it right to do so? Can such an instrument be misused? I have seen people complaining regarding this at consumer rights forums.
I request banking & finance professionals to please help me understand the issue.
yes, this is true., the bank cannot take the blank cheque's as guarantee. The bank can take 3-4 cheque's as guarantee, but these cheque's have to be in the name of the Bank and it has to be of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of the finance given, which can change from bank to bank. The bank takes these as an guarantee if the customer defaults in payment, that also can be done with the customer consent. These cheque's have to be returned to the customer at the completion of the loan.
The details about this is stated in the Loan Agreement, which should be properly studied while taking the loan, the other details such as the Rate of Interest, the Loan Schedule, etc is also stated in it.
Prosecution ruled out in blank cheque bounce cases
Saturday, Feb 20, 2010 at 0139 hrs IST
Bombay High Court | Law And Order | Blank Cheque Bounce Case
The Bombay High Court has held that if a blank, post-dated cheque—which has been issued only as a ‘collateral security’ for a loan—bounces, the debtor cannot be prosecuted under the Negotiable Instruments (NI) Act.
for further clarifications: call : dr.b.n.soans at 09245201687
Very often banks take blank, post-dated che-ques from borrowers as a security for repayment. Criminal case under the NI Act cannot be lodged if such cheques bounced, Justice PR Borkar held in his judgement last week.
The judgement could be a jolt for private banks, but public sector banks wouldn’t be affected by it, says MR Umarjee, chief legal advisor, Indian Banks’ Association. “I don’t think the Bombay HC judgement will have any implication in the case of state-owned banks, as they don’t ask for such blank cheques from their borrowers. Yes, those banks that ask for blank cheques may be affected by this judgement.
Other bankers contacted by FE refused to comment on the development, saying they have not gone through the judgement.
The judgement was passed on a petition filed by Ramkrishna Urban Cooperative Credit Society (RUCCS) in Ahmednagar district.
RUCCS had given a loan of Rs 2 lakh to a person named Rajendra Varma in 2000. Varma had issued 10 blank post-dated cheques at the time as a security for repayment.
One of these cheques, dated January 2008, bounced following which RUCCS filed criminal complaint against Varma. However, the magistrate's court held that Varma was not guilty under the NI Act and acquitted him. The society filed an application in Aurangabad bench of High Court seeking its permission to file appeal in sessions court.
The High Court noted that the NI Act was intended to give more credibility to cheque as a financial instrument; “However, the object was not to provide effective and speedy remedy for recovery of loans,” it said. “Law makers must not have intended or imagined that money lenders or banks would obtain blank or post-dated cheques while sanctioning/disbursing loans as securities and would use them to make debtors/borrowers to repay loan under threat of prosecution and punishment under Section 138 of NI Act,” Justice Borkar held, dismissing the application.
“It is doubtful if provisions of Section 138 attracted to a case in which a blank or post-dated cheque is obtained by a bank or money lender before or while sanctioning or disbursing loan amount as security for the loan,” the judge said.
“In this case, the accused respondent issued the cheque in question as security for loan before loan amount was disbursed. So, cheque was not towards any existing debt or liability (which is a requirement under Section 138),” the high court observed, confirming the order of acquittal....original http://www.consumercourt.in/loan/1871-can-bank-keep-blank-cheque-security.html
Prosecution ruled out in blank cheque bounce cases
Saturday, Feb 20, 2010 at 0139 hrs IST
Bombay High Court | Law And Order | Blank Cheque Bounce Case
The Bombay High Court has held that if a blank, post-dated cheque—which has been issued only as a ‘collateral security’ for a loan—bounces, the debtor cannot be prosecuted under the Negotiable Instruments (NI) Act.
for further clarifications: call : dr.b.n.soans at 09245201687
Very often banks take blank, post-dated che-ques from borrowers as a security for repayment. Criminal case under the NI Act cannot be lodged if such cheques bounced, Justice PR Borkar held in his judgement last week.
The judgement could be a jolt for private banks, but public sector banks wouldn’t be affected by it, says MR Umarjee, chief legal advisor, Indian Banks’ Association. “I don’t think the Bombay HC judgement will have any implication in the case of state-owned banks, as they don’t ask for such blank cheques from their borrowers. Yes, those banks that ask for blank cheques may be affected by this judgement.
Other bankers contacted by FE refused to comment on the development, saying they have not gone through the judgement.
The judgement was passed on a petition filed by Ramkrishna Urban Cooperative Credit Society (RUCCS) in Ahmednagar district.
RUCCS had given a loan of Rs 2 lakh to a person named Rajendra Varma in 2000. Varma had issued 10 blank post-dated cheques at the time as a security for repayment.
One of these cheques, dated January 2008, bounced following which RUCCS filed criminal complaint against Varma. However, the magistrate's court held that Varma was not guilty under the NI Act and acquitted him. The society filed an application in Aurangabad bench of High Court seeking its permission to file appeal in sessions court.
The High Court noted that the NI Act was intended to give more credibility to cheque as a financial instrument; “However, the object was not to provide effective and speedy remedy for recovery of loans,” it said. “Law makers must not have intended or imagined that money lenders or banks would obtain blank or post-dated cheques while sanctioning/disbursing loans as securities and would use them to make debtors/borrowers to repay loan under threat of prosecution and punishment under Section 138 of NI Act,” Justice Borkar held, dismissing the application.
“It is doubtful if provisions of Section 138 attracted to a case in which a blank or post-dated cheque is obtained by a bank or money lender before or while sanctioning or disbursing loan amount as security for the loan,” the judge said.
“In this case, the accused respondent issued the cheque in question as security for loan before loan amount was disbursed. So, cheque was not towards any existing debt or liability (which is a requirement under Section 138),” the high court observed, confirming the order of acquittal....original http://www.consumercourt.in/loan/1871-can-bank-keep-blank-cheque-security.html
Cheque is nothing but a promise by one party to other to pay certain sum mentioned on the cheque throurg a banker, there is no harm in providing cheques of other banks as guarantee for payment but such cheques are duly signed and filled by the issuing party, it will be subject to the validity period of cheque. Normally for bank guarantee, bankers will ask for an agreement on the stamp paper of appropriate value stipulating the terms and conditions of the gurantee. They will be providing you guarantee only if you provide sufficient security, either movable or immovable, based on the business policy of the banker. They can formulate their own policy subject to RBI regulations to provide guarantee, to my knowledge there is no harm in accepting cheques of other banks as gurantee but bankers normally do not do that. To my knowledge none of the provisions of Negotiable Instrument Act debar you from providing cheque as security for payment of any debt or gurantee as the case may be, but stop payment is feature attached to cheque.
Legally yes it is possible to take cheques.
At Choradia Rupiya Mandi we are involved in providing credit to the social sector that do not qualify for loans from bank. We plug the gap here. The organization at the primary level is involved in Vehicle finance. We specialize in making credit accessible to the social group whose livelihood depends on the vehicle.
These are typically the guys who will not shy away from paying 10-15% per month as interest on hand loans. We are trying to plug this gap by not only providing them with easy finance but also providing them a source of livelihood that not only feeds a stomach but an entire family.
We are aware of their difficulties when it comes to accessing credit to buy a vehicle to feed the family or to arrange quick money to pay as advance to rent a house or it could be making money accessible for a marriage at home or clear hospital bills of a loved one admitted.
And that is why we unabashedly say we are Creating entrepreneurs and in the process maximizing not only shareholder’s value but also enriching the stakeholders.
Additionally we take a counter guarantee and cheques from them. And our experience has shown that more often than not customers prefer to settle there dues when they are under this obligation.
Infact we did even experiment without taking cheques as guarantee. The results were catastrophic and we had to revert back to this system. As they say 'Prevention is better than cure'. And taking cheques is a preventive way of turning good loans to bad.
After all Let's not forget we are into business and nobody would love to see there money wasted or turning to bad loans more so if the intentions also are good and results are win-win for everybody.
Sorry to be l;ate as usual Ujval!! But der aye durust aye.. :))
I think its a very sad way to deal with customers money!! And taking blank cheques is a fraudulent way to deal with for the sake of guarantee!! Its preposterous and its illegal. It gives rise to the fraudulent ways of the banking system and the people who enforce these systems on the consumers!! It also shows a certain corrupt nature of the bankers... Where would that money go... into the pockets of the bank officer or the bank safe deposit vault????
Interesting... Thanks for the referral!!
I do not think it is illegal for banks to ask for a blank cheque from the customer as counter-guaratee for advances granted to them.
The agreement between the banks and the borrowers is based on some terms and condition and execution of some legal documents like a promissory notes, memorandum of charge, hypothecation agreement, etc. Normally, a promissory note is valid for three years and it has to be dated before execution. The repayment tenor of the loan is more than three years and in order to keep the documents legally valid, the banks seeks a blank cheque from the customer. This is like a demand note. This practice is prevalent in most countries and it is an accepted practice.
As stated above, there is no illegal and it is in line with the terms and condition for availing credit facilities.
i trust the above answers your query,
The Bank has no legal right to keep a blank cheque as security. If it has done with the consent and knowledge of the account holder, the account holder has all the legal and moral right to instruct his Bank to stop payment, before it is presented, by giving it in writing his intention to stop payment of cheque. Even under the negotiable instruments act if stop payment instructions are given to the bank no criminal action can be initiated. The Bank already has a agreement, undertaking and two guarantors who guarantee that the loanee will pay the loan. So a blank cheque is invalid document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKNEU8GpjCI Nice song...to share with friends.. |
Why not..if trust is there... |
Thanks Mr Manishji...inspirational....as always.. |