lifestyle advertising in a customer-centric world
|
|
Activity:
Question posted: 05 21 2008 02:43:32 +0000,
7 answers, 174 views, last activity
07 06 2010 20:18:08 +0000
|
|
|
|
1. On one hand its true from middle class customers perspective coz it becomes bit difficult for them to arrange for lifestlye brands after managing their daily expenses.
2. While if we look from rich class customers point of view they pay for the worth of product, which includes brand image and quality. I mentioned brand image first reason is that no matter what the quality of the product may be if it doesn't has a premium brand image of lifestyle it will not be prefered by the customers.
3. From company point of view these days competition is at its peak there are lot of competitors of any product resulting into price war. So the prices are kept in accordance to its demand and supply in the market and its image. All together its a fair exchange
The cost of making a label into a Brand is huge and involves many factors. Customer buys a brand not as a product because of aspiration. That particular brand has to fit into there lifestyle and image. To take the brand to that height takes investment in terms of money, research, time, manpower, etc.
Most of the lifestyle brands sold through there own retail stores to give same look, image, ambiance and service levels. Selling to target customers, brands have to go near them in terms of store presence. They open there store in prime markets or malls. Every sought market has a price to lease which is higher then other markets. Staff, cost of interior, quality of the goods etc has to be at par with the brand image; again costly one.
If we calculate there marketing, selling, operating and product cost even at high MRP they does not make much margin as they are constantly investing in future markets, inventories, planning etc.
In addition those brands; which are called as lifestyle brands because customers have accepted there fashion element, offerings and finally there MRP.
From the way look at it.
This is a plain case of demand and supply. The world today is moving towards the "Show and Shine" policy, The fact that these brands are called lifestyle brands, is because hey are not meant for the middle class or classes lower than it. There has always been a certain category of people who want to set them selves apart from the general class by, the brands they use or the places they Visit, etc. ( and they'd better be expensive so that the general class doesn't find them affordable, of course not ignoring the Quality of the product you get with the brand name and the price)
The Life style brands have identified this need as is only supplying the Demand of this Clas. I dont see how this would translate into making money at other expense. As the target customer for these brands purchases them only b'coz of the Equity and the remium price they charge.
Establishing Brand name involves lot of investment of resources like Time , Money, and Product Research. Many a times stirng of products may fail and after all this 1 product may succeed!
It can test the endurance abilities of the creators both in terms of resources as well as patience!
Many of the companies who advocate Brand and or demand premium price, now this well.
Hence they always want to have a reasonable return on thier investments in form of premium price and / or Brand Protection.
Imagine if such people were non existent! There would neither be a premium Brand nor the "ME TOO" or "I TOO" copy cats!
It would have been utter Chaos!!
I see it from a different point of view....Each Brand has its own positioning statement which reflects in its Pricing, Features, Segmentation, Quality etc.....
Also each Product addresses a specific target segment..certain products of lifestyle brands are approachable by Middle class segment however most of others are for niche segment...which is fair. I dont see a issue on the pricing and do not see it as a case of making money on others expense.
When lifestyle became popular a generation ago, a number of critics objected to it as voguish and superficial, perhaps because it appeared to elevate habits of consumption, dress, and recreation to categories in a system of social classification. Nonetheless, the word has proved durable and useful, if only because such categories do in fact figure importantly in the schemes that Americans commonly invoke when explaining social values and behavior, as in Rachel Brownstein's remark that “an anticonventional lifestyle is no sure sign of feminist politics, or indeed, of any politics at all.” Fifty-three percent of the Usage Panel accepts the word in Bohemian attitudes toward conventional society have been outstripped and outdated by the lifestyles of millions of young people. An even greater number—fully 70 percent—accepts the word in Salaries in the Bay Area may be higher, but it may cost employees as much as 30 percent more to maintain their lifestyles, where the context requires a term that implies categorization based on habits of consumption
I feel that brands are not expensive because the extra money that we pay to buy brands is basically the amount of confidence that we have in that the product/service. After all they charge what we can pay. And we have loyal customers available, who are ready to pay anything for their favorite brand. The only difference between a generic product and a premium brand what I think is often only in the mind of the customer. The trust, the belief makes him to pay for it.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and kick the politicians as in they should not be involved. A gag order should be issued to restrain politicians and media from commenting on it. IT should be followed by a short announcement by the EC on the voting date. People all over the ocuntry... |
Nothing should be imposed or made compulsory. Supposing it is made compulsory to use only lotus - our national flower for all festivals and in temples, how ridiculous it sounds ? In the same breath imposing a language would be counterproductive. The... |
Its just that they are so caught up with their own problems in life that they dont have time for the poor. Then again, the question that begs askance is "Is the rich yuppie class aware of the needs of the poor ?" I in fact feel that the urban middle... |