Is Anna right in dictating to the government with entering electoral politicals?

Has my reading of Anna come right, Shanti? A man prone to shoot his mouth off. He was propped by his spin-doctors, but left to himself, he lacks intellectual capacity. A man not to be taken seriously. 

See his initial reaction to the person slapping Sharad Pawar. 'Bas ek hi tappad mara'. And his subsequent attempt to pull out of it. Anna Hazare seems to be a rogue as each day passes. A man who has no value for his words. We Indians can be fools. We were referring to him as Gandhi - II, a few months back. God bless this country.

Yes I totally agree with most of the group that this movement is frivilous. However most still feel that Anna integrity is beyond question.

I personally do not know him and have not followed him before this movement. But this is true the ideal solution is what Shanthi Roshan suggest. Get back to his area of work. And I understand from her writings she is either from Ralegaon or has been closely associated with it.

Yes! People with different agendas crop up different mascot or less kindly a mukda to try and capture power through the backdoor. We have seen this over the years (precicesly 3 times - JP movent, Jan Morcha of V. P. Singh and now, Anna).

I for one was particularly fascinated by the Jan Morcha movement. I was in the that age - a age prone to live in the world make-believe. Though that all ills of the society was the making of the governemnt. However, I discovered the reality soon enough. Once the Rajiv lost the elections, I was witness to the marginalization of V. P. Singh and the rule of scounderels.

Today's scenerio  does seem to be playing out the same way with Anna at the center-stage. Remember all three movements were against Corruption. Yet nothing has changed.

he has to go a long way, nobody knows where, his aim is, might be to his target, which seems dark in present scenario.

First let Anna get out of his confusion. Whether he is on a maun vrath or shouting from roof-tops, whether he wants to enter electoral politics or not, whether he will campaign for or against Congress or simply abstain. Is his movement against corruption over or not. Once he is clear in his mind regarding himself, then he can preach to others. This gentleman smacks of irresponsibility.

Very aptly worded Shanti. 'Lost in the woods.' Even if I do not have the soft corner for Anna that  you have, I do assume he is a man of integrity.  However, to the best of my knowledge he does not tolerate difference of opinions and even worse is susceptible to people with dubious intention. He is also very much ego-centric and prone to shoot his mouth of. Maybe the latter can be explained as simplicity of the man. But a good amount tend to call it naivety. And to such a person dictating, to the government in the guise of Gandhian is just not acceptable.

"Probably over time he will recognise the trees from the woods. Or he will be lost in the woods"..... I agree with Shanti Roshan !!