Posted in Community :
Clinical Research - outsourced
|
|
Activity:
Question posted: 04 27 2008 22:46:14 +0000,
3 answers, 238 views, last activity
07 06 2010 20:18:08 +0000
|
|
|
|
Top Answer :
I also prefer independent research organization, but this may not work for the benefit of the company.
by
Gangadhar GangaSagar, Head/VP/GM-Marketing, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Asia Pacific Limited
| 05 07 2008 11:56:39 +0000
Prev1NextShowing 1 - 2 of 3
Answered by
Dr. Seema Goel, Documentation/Medical Writing, Accenture Services Pvt.Ltd
| 05 12 2008 07:23:25 +0000
Answered by
Sandhya Rani, Product Development Manager, Novartis
| 04 27 2008 22:48:13 +0000
I think independent organisation. By hiring an independent clinical research organization to administer testing, results of testing are less questioned, since the independent organization has no self-interest in promoting a bad drug. Increasingly as some medications, which were tested by their makers, have proven not to do what they promise...
Prev1NextShowing 1 - 2 of 3
Found the question
"Some large drug manufacturing companies have a clinical research organization within the company. Others prefer to outsource testing and drug development to other organizations specifically designed for this purpose. Which one is better?"
interesting?
Refer to your connections and communities
Viewers also viewed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unanswered Questions (30)
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Jobs
More From Author
PUNE: The proposed Central Drug Authority (CDA) bill — that envisages imprisonment of five years and a fine of Rs 20 lakh for those found violating norms of clinical trials — will be tabled during the upcoming monsoon session of the Parliament.... |
