Moving up the Biotechnology value chain |
Agriculture Biotechnology |
Bioinformatics |
5 more ...|
|
Activity:
Question posted: 05 19 2009 07:46:48 +0000,
5 answers, 236 views, last activity
07 06 2010 20:18:08 +0000
|
|
A biomarker indicates a change in expression or state of a protein that correlates with the risk or progression of a disease, or with the susceptibility of the disease to a given treatment. Many new biomarkers are being developed that involve imaging technology. Imaging biomarkers have many advantages. Validation is a key step in maximizing the clinical and commercial success of a biomarker. So can you all please help me by suggesting the best methods for it.
Biomarker assay validation should be performed ideally in stages on ‘a fit for purpose' basis avoiding unnecessarily dogmatic adherence to rigid guidelines but with careful monitoring of progress at the end of each stage. These principles are illustrated with two specific examples:
(a) absolute quantitation of protein biomarkers by mass spectrometry and
(b) the M30 and M65 ELISA assays as surrogate end points of cell death
Bioanalytical assays
For each identified biomarker that is found relevant, specific bioassays are developed, optimized and validated for a reliable, cost- and time-effective follow-up. Since mass spectrometry was used to identify the biomarker, LC-MS and LC-MS/MS methods are usually well suited, and we use our expertise in the field to this end, typically based on FDA standards.
The relevance of identified biomarker candidates is first evaluated in silico, to evaluate if the corresponding molecule has a known link to the disease or not yet. Bioassays are then developped and validated (see above). The last step, which often is the most challenging, consists in the validation of the biomarker on large sets of samples, in different biological matrices. The biomarker has to be specific to the disease when compared to healthy samples, but its specificity versus other pathologies (which can sometimes be closely related) and versus different types of medical treatments (a biomarker can be induced by another drug used to treat other problems) remains a major challenge.
Newly discovered biomarkers are then used to develop and validate clinical assays for prognosis, for diagnosis and for the follow-up of medical treatments.
For validating multiple protein biomarkers, protein microarray technologies offer great opportunities. The advantages of protein microarrays include high sensitivity, good reproducibility, quantitative accuracy, low sample volumes and parallelization when used in large populations of samples. However, the acquisition of a sufficient variety and quantity of various proteins for microarrays is a key challenge for such a technology.
PCR Array
For validating multiple RNA biomarkers, a promising technology is the PCR array, a high-throughput quantitative real-time (RT)-PCR technique, which combines the quantitative performance of RT-PCR with the multiple gene-profiling capabilities of microarrays to detect the expression of panels of genes simultaneously. The strengths of such a high-performance array platform include good reproducibility, specificity, high sensitivity and wide dynamic ranges. In particular, its flexibility and simplicity make it accessible for routine use in every laboratory, which is beneficial to large-scale analysis of biomarker validation across different laboratories. Currently, this technique has been used in the gene expression profiling of bladder, gastric and liver cancers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depressed youngsters who do not socialise much are most likely to lash out violently at others, a new study has claimed.According to researchers at Texas A M International University, the strongest risk factors for violent behaviour were... |
Connecting health care systems is challenging. Wide variations in clinical terminology, patient identification methods and systems architecture makes integrating health information exceptionally difficult. But if implemented, it will turn out to... |
I think the major challenge is lack of knowledge. They may not be aware of the availability of online health resources also. Adding on, the inadequate distribution of evaluated outcomes also turns out as a challenge. As far as sharing of expertise... |
