Create knowledge
[?]
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
0
|
VS |
4
|
No
|
 |
Rengarajan Murali
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 2 years ago
|
|
Because of all the above points I am diffident about the prognosis. I am not sure if we will have per capita income of USD 5 at today's ppp in 2060. I fervently hope that I have lost the plot and I am completely wrong.
|
|
|
|
amit yadav
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 2 years ago
|
|
because of lack of man power and technology...
|
|
Debate: "Can India become a developed country in 50 years?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Thinkers and doers can't be same
|
10
|
VS |
16
|
Thinkers and doers can be same
|
 |
Saud Rehman
| Argues in support of
"Thinkers and doers can be same"
| 2 years ago
|
|
What a beautiful question!!!! Thinkers(Read Mangers) have to get work done from the doers.All their stategies will bite the dust if they are not do-able or not done right. So i think thinkers have to put the doers hat and it helps if they have...
|
|
|
|
Rengarajan Murali
| Argues in support of
| 2 years ago
|
|
Can Thinkers and doers be the same? 10/8/2009 Thinking, for the purpose of this topic, is taken to mean strategic thinking and NOT thinking involved in operations. Eventhough there are clear differences between the two processes - thinking and doing -...
|
|
 |
V.Durga Rao
| Argues in support of
"Thinkers and doers can be same"
| 2 years ago
|
|
Yes, certainly can be same. Bill Gates has disclosed at once that he used to think alot when he was a student and child. Bill Gates thinking has materialised int he form of writing first software and sending an offer and then finally getting the...
|
|
Debate: "Can Thinkers and doers be the same?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
I have been listening the news about making 'Right to Education to children' as fundamental right by bringing suitable changes to Constitution of India. To be frank, I don't understand as to what is the use of bringing a law like 'Right to Education' with so much media hype. I have great respect for Sri Kapil Cibal a he is a great lawyer and a very knowledgeable person. But, I am not able to understand as to the use of spending so much time on passing law dealing with 'Right to Education'. Part-III of Constitution of India deal with the Fundamental Rights. The entire concept has become very complicated to understand and if anyone clarifies me the scope of Part-III of constitution ...
 |
Manoj Chaturvedi
| Commented
| 2 years ago
|
|
Of course it does. Every child should get basic primary level of education at least till 14 yrs in the absence of which he won't be able to understand the society properly and won't be able to become a good citizen of our country.
|
|
|
|
Rengarajan Murali
| Commented
| 2 years ago
|
|
While I am for Education for all, I am not sure on the follwoing: 1. I don't see any benefit to the politicians in this; on the other hand it will make dealing with an rights-aware electorate difficult. (Look at Kerala, which has a high literacy rate,...
|
|
 |
Tanmay Gaur
| Commented
| 2 years ago
|
|
I think I agree with Viktor, this should be taken as a positive move from an Indian govt. We all know how we have loop holes to suit our living in India. We have constitution, we have judiciary, but the execution is at will and comfort of...
|
|
Insight: "Do you feel that the proposed "Right to Education to the children" makes any sense?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
I have been listening the news about making 'Right to Education to children' as fundamental right by bringing suitable changes to Constitution of India. To be frank, I don't understand as to what is the use of bringing a law like 'Right to Education' with so much media hype. I have great respect for Sri Kapil Cibal a he is a great lawyer and a very knowledgeable person. But, I am not able to understand as to the use of spending so much time on passing law dealing with 'Right to Education'. Part-III of Constitution of India deal with the Fundamental Rights. The entire concept has become very complicated to understand and if anyone clarifies me the scope of Part-III of constitution ...
|
|
Manoj Chaturvedi
| Commented
| 2 years ago
|
|
Of course it does. Every child should get basic primary level of education at least till 14 yrs in the absence of which he won't be able to understand the society properly and won't be able to become a good citizen of our country.
|
|
|
|
Rengarajan Murali
| Commented
| 2 years ago
|
|
While I am for Education for all, I am not sure on the follwoing: 1. I don't see any benefit to the politicians in this; on the other hand it will make dealing with an rights-aware electorate difficult. (Look at Kerala, which has a high literacy rate,...
|
|
|
|
Tanmay Gaur
| Commented
| 2 years ago
|
|
I think I agree with Viktor, this should be taken as a positive move from an Indian govt. We all know how we have loop holes to suit our living in India. We have constitution, we have judiciary, but the execution is at will and comfort of...
|
|
Insight: "Do you feel that the proposed "Right to Education to the children" makes any sense?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
11
|
VS |
7
|
No
|
 |
Sushil Gangwar
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 1 year ago
|
|
its depand on the time and person . Beat anything in the life. Join social media today. www.sakshatkar.com www.pressvarta.com
|
|
|
|
Rengarajan Murali
| Argues in support of
| 2 years ago
|
|
I am not for or against what PM said in the LS. It is meant for the galleries. Joint Statement had its traps for both the PMs. And the opponents are making the most of it. However my point is: we need to keep the talks going and isolate the...
|
|
 |
Dinesh funezn
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 2 years ago
|
|
I support. India as an emerging power today has lot more responsibilities than to fight with Pakistan for the big "K" word. It is now high time that we become confident that the big fat "K" is ours, and the whole world knows it. As a responsible...
|
|
Debate: "Do Prime Minister's action on Pakistan deserves Support?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
i am bad at it,i need to improve.
|
10
|
VS |
2
|
you cannot help it.
|
 |
SB DIKSHIT
| Argues in support of
"i am bad at it,i need to improve."
| 2 years ago
|
|
In spite of many arument,this is a good lesson , If we stop arguing and follow then it will be very effective.
|
|
|
|
Rengarajan Murali
| Argues in support of
| 2 years ago
|
|
It can't be that all of them are wrong. For sure I am doing or saying something wrong. Or I am plain being wrong. (In all the above, I don't mean Wrong in the absolute sense but inrealtion to the communication). Langauge itself has shortcomings, at...
|
|
 |
Makrand Bhave
| Argues in support of
"you cannot help it."
| 2 years ago
|
|
These are CATCH 22 situations! It depends completely on both the parties involved. One who explains the wants and the other who understands the wants. IF the needs are explained carefully and understood carefully, the task is or can be completed...
|
|
Debate: "when you are misunderstood what to do.and if it happens again and again" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
Being part of legal profession, as a person who has seen litigation and practical difficulties, and looking at the public criticism, I am convinced that I can expose the greatness of legal profession and the true legal professionals. The greatness lies in the difficulties and also the qualities required to stand and to come-up in profession. While I deal with difficulties, I am not considering the privileged class. The difficulties are as follows: 1. There is a general assumption that students who are poor in studies will take-up law. 2. Looking at the professionals who suffer in life to make money and looking at the standards of some of the legal professionals, there is no ...
 |
Ajay Ziz
| Commented
| 2 years ago
|
|
rao sahib where can i get nani palkhivalas, live recordings, of court proceedings.
|
|
|
|
Rengarajan Murali
| Commented
| 2 years ago
|
|
1. They have to have knowledge of a gamut of disciplines, (archaic, complicated and convoluted) laws, case-laws, innumerable rules etc and should be able to recall! 2. They have to deal with all kinds of low-lifes - be it civil or crimnal practice. 3....
|
|
|
|
motty john
| Commented
| 2 years ago
|
|
"There may be occassions in your career when you may loose a case ,then behave in such a manner that you don't loose your client, Theremay be occassions in your career when you may loose a case and the client then behave in such a manner you don't...
|
|
Insight: "Do you know where the greatness of legal profession lies?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE IF YOU HAVE THE CAPACITY
|
45
|
VS |
22
|
SHOULD RETIRE ONCE YOU ATTAINED PENSIONABLE AGE.
|
 |
S. Jayaraman
| Argues in support of
"SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE IF YOU HAVE THE CAPACITY "
| 1 year ago
|
|
What can I say . I was denied the job when I was 47 years old and this experience makes me write that you should allow a flower to naturally blossom, spread the fragrance and then wither away ." If our Hon'ble Prime Minister can perform at this...
|
|
|
|
Rengarajan Murali
| Argues in support of
| 2 years ago
|
|
No! A person should be allowed to continue irrespective of the age, provided he/she is willing to do it for 50% of the pay and 50% of time. It should be ensured that 40% of their time is spent on transferring their skills and knowledge to others. The...
|
|
 |
Devi Kaladeen
| Argues in support of
"SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE IF YOU HAVE THE CAPACITY "
| 2 years ago
|
|
I honestly believe that a person should be given a chance to continue working after they have reached retirement age if they are willing to work for a few more years. In many cases you find that these people are really an asset to the workplace...
|
|
Debate: "Does age really matters? " deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
We are chosen generation to bring world change and world peace
|
6
|
VS |
5
|
Impossible dream
|
|
|
Rengarajan Murali
| Argues in support of
"Impossible dream"
| 2 years ago
|
|
I am a deeply devout person, yet I can not believe that spirituality will change the economic ills by cutting at the root of greed, selfishness etc. To be sure I am not a communist either. Money is a common denominator for all and hence is a...
|
|
 |
Mathew Cherian
| Argues in support of
"We are chosen generation to bring world change and world peace"
| 3 years ago
|
|
What you are doing is wonderful, people with more faith in God, but one has to understand that the systems expecially the one that works like developed world they have the cmplimentary value thesis like lessening 'moral hazards' and nullifying...
|
|
 |
Swati Raut
| Argues in support of
"Impossible dream"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Hey Gary, I appreciate what you are doing and value your opinion. WIth this classifier, are you kidding when you say that spiritualism is going to solve this. I find it hard to agree as: Historically when people had more faith in religion, the...
|
|
Debate: "Economic System of the Kingdom of God" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
We have improved harmony, peace and good life
|
7
|
VS |
5
|
It is the same as it would have been without civilization
|
 |
Atul Kumar
| Argues in support of
"We have improved harmony, peace and good life"
| 2 years ago
|
|
The compare is improper and not very relevant. Just to add, even in Jungle, there is fight for rule, super animal and their ruling area. This can be highly seen with streat dogs even. Let it be animal or human being, for better living conditions,...
|
|
|
|
Radha V
| Argues in support of
"It is the same as it would have been without civilization"
| 2 years ago
|
|
Humans should be certainly monitored, governed and controlled still further.Inspite of we being human beings, still there are issues like terrorism,or the events that we hear in day-to-day news. There are both pros and cons in this matter.We have...
|
|
|
|
Rengarajan Murali
| Argues in support of
"We have improved harmony, peace and good life"
| 2 years ago
|
|
Humanoids were social animals. Also, we are the first animals to be altruistic. While soical living gave protection from other animals, the (physically) weaker ones within the groups were dominated by the stronger ones. With passage of time ,we...
|
|
Debate: "Why humans need to be governed, monitored and controlled?" deleted from your view.
Follow me on
