Create knowledge
[?]
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
29
|
VS |
16
|
No
|
 |
Ishan Dave
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 1 year ago
|
|
Govt should not abolish deemed universities, as india's population is increasing, the Students for higher education will increase. so, the way to control this situation is to control the quality standard of these universities to provide better...
|
|
 |
siddharth mathur
| Argues in support of
| 2 years ago
|
|
Abolishing the deemed status will allow government to scrutinize the very actions of these universities which have completely diverged from their main agenda and are exercising arbitrariness through a totally flawed mechanism. Removing the deemed...
|
|
 |
Sarika Singh
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 2 years ago
|
|
Dear Manoj, why don't you think about the future of students who'll be deprived of higher education because of this? and what's the guarantee money game won't be played there? We all know government institutions are famous for their corruption....
|
|
Debate: "Was the decision right from Government to abolish deemed universities?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
37
|
VS |
22
|
No
|
|
|
John Jacob
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 1 year ago
|
|
It is not that we do not have strong laws, we do have strong laws but we do not have a strong will to enforce those laws. The system (political parties, government,law enforcement, the tilt towards socialism, social shaming and threatening people...
|
|
|
|
siddharth mathur
| Argues in support of
| 2 years ago
|
|
Well, right, law is indeed meant for prevention and urges to thwart the very happening of an act which it doesn't deems to be 'just'. But, the problem with regulating terrorism with a regulation is that terrorism neither is a mission which seek to kill...
|
|
 |
Viktor Stephen
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Terrorism cannot be checked by passing laws alone. Law makers will make the law, but who will enforce the law? and who will ensure speedy justice. The need of the hour is police and judicial reforms. We need a modern and effective police force...
|
|
Debate: "Has India been vulnerable to terrorism for absence of a strong law" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
21
|
VS |
11
|
No
|
|
|
Bodhi Satwa Roy
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 10 months ago
|
|
Anti-Terrorism laws need a slight tweaking.Ther should no trials, no courts and a single judgement - Death sentence with a bullet. Result - Faster disposal of cases, fair judgement and of course lot savings of taxpayers' money.
|
|
|
|
siddharth mathur
| Argues in support of
| 2 years ago
|
|
Indian Parliament and the state legislatures have a record of enacting numerous outdated laws, the plight of which is not very difficult to comprehend. Most of them are either facing dust for the lack of proper implementation, or are facing a trial...
|
|
 |
Rajeev Khare
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Yes it needs a revamp badly, like in the UK, the Terrorism Act 2006, which was enacted after the July 7 2005 London bombings, allows detention for 28 days of any suspect without any charges. This will help prevent terrorism in a broader way..
|
|
Debate: "Should India revamp its Anti-Terrorism Laws??" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
5
|
VS |
3
|
No
|
|
|
siddharth mathur
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 3 years ago
|
|
No, India being a plural society with the element of Unity in Diversity, understanding minds of the people or their "Indianness" only with the help of one reference, like the region to which they belong will be wrong. The ideology, which we are...
|
|
 |
Atul Kumar
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 3 years ago
|
|
I disagree with Shishir. I have been to different part of India and some other conuntries. The first identity people ask as are you south indian or noth indian ? Everywhere there is group of same region people live together, spend time together....
|
|
|
|
Ajay Kr Mishra
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Yes, Becouse of that the Indian are not improving up to the mark...
|
|
Debate: "Are indians leading to regional division ?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
38
|
VS |
56
|
No
|
 |
Prakash Saitwal
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 8 months ago
|
|
I tried very hard, to search for reasons to vote for Rahul Gandhi. But I failed. At the age of 41, he is like a blank slate. On the important issues, during crisis time (e.g. Anna Hazare's agitation), he keeps his mouth shut. Whenever he opens his...
|
|
|
|
siddharth mathur
| Argues in support of
| 3 years ago
|
|
I still can't understand why people are not interested in judging a person on the grounds of his ability and acumen when it comes to leadership. Apart from being a youth, he doesn't have any quality to stand as a leader of approx. 1.5 billion people,...
|
|
 |
Suhas Goel
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Well though I am a pro BJP person...still I would like to vote Rahul Gandhi as a very prospective deserving candidate to become the next Prime Minister of India. He is young, he is talented, and he has got the right personality and lineage to...
|
|
Debate: "Do you think Rahul Gandhi will be good Prime Minister for India?" deleted from your view.
Follow me on
