Create knowledge
[?]
|
(rate this)
|
Dear Mr.thomas, I am practicing lawyer based at New Delhi, mostly looking after litigation, ADR and conveyancing. How can I help you. You may visit my website www.sgsolicitors.com Thanks, Sunil Goel,...
Answer: "Dear Mr.Thomas," deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
A caller X from his mobile frequently make blank calls to person Y at his mobile, even at odd hours. When Y picks up the phone, X disconnects it. This is turning out to be a nuisance. What is the rem...
 |
Ajay Ziz
| Answered
| 2 years ago
|
|
VILLAGERS SOLUTION :: HAVE TWO SIMS :: A CHINESE MOBILE :: I NUMBER FOR JUNTA JANARDHAN ( OPEN FRO 10 TO 4 )::: 2ND FOR THE CLOSE CIRCLE ( 24 HOURS):: NO NEED OF LITIGATION :: OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENT , IS'NT IT ::
|
|
Answer: "Harassment by mobile phone" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
yes
|
8
|
VS |
5
|
No
|
 |
Saurabh
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 1 year ago
|
|
This act was basically made to take care of accounts with default in interest payment and other non-performing assets.The blocked funds of banks needs to be recovered otherwise the banks liquidity position will be at risk.
|
|
 |
hik
| Argues in support of
"yes"
| 1 year ago
|
|
Securitisation involves the pooling of assets and the subsequent sale of the cash flows from these asset pools to investors.
|
|
 |
Aarti Gupta
| Argues in support of
"yes"
| 2 years ago
|
|
Actually, Securitisation companies in the name of recovering public dues, are make money at the cost of closing down even running units. The common man is suffering because of this. This Act should indeed be scrapped immediately.
|
|
Debate: "Securitisation Act 2002 - Hanging sword on hapless borrowers" deleted from your view.
Follow me on
