Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 
 

Shiv sena V/s SRK: Who is right?

Tags : Shiv sena, shahrukh khan, my name is khan, MNIK, shahrukh controversy,
Industry : Radio, TV & Films
Functional Area : Politics
Share
 
 
 
About "Shiv sena V/s SRK: Who is right?" topic:

Lately we have seen a sort of showdown between Mumbai or Bombay's two powerful personalities, one who is famous all over the country for his acting skills, and the other who is famous for mob politics, and showing what regionalism's true face. Both Shahrukh khan and the Thackrey's on the whole have locked horns and neither of them are ready to budge, and this is causing havoc in Mumbai, as businesses mainly in the form of Movie business got  hit due the threats of Shiv sena & MNS workers, it is still not clear like who is responsible for the ongoing tension in Mumbai.

4 debates , 1 question on topic: "Shiv sena V/s SRK: Who is right?"
Start a new discussion on the topic ...
 
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Start Debate
 
(rate this)
Yes 
15
VS
44
 No
Syed Shakir Hussain  |  Argues in support of  "No"  |  1 year ago
India is not a property of one man ...what shah rukh said was not something which should be discussed or be apologetic of he has his view and is patriotism shldnt be question on that .. Shiv sena just want to play dirty politics and nothing .....
Ajay Ziz  |  Argues in support of  "Yes"  |  1 year ago
sharukh khan a great character when asked by a reporter how he feels about musharraf said ... musharraf sahib ki baat hi kuch aur hai .. this srk bugger should be put in a time machine and taken back 22 years and reverted to his original status...
P.C.Sukanand  |  Argues in support of  "Yes"  |  2 years ago
Looks like he's dabbling with too many things acting ,producing, T 20 - 20 , now this political statement not called for , what was sharukh doing when they were auctioning players ? why didnt he bid for them ? ok , you have not bid for them but...
 support: 
 
 
Debate: "Should Shahrukh apologise to Shiv sena to restore normalcy in Mumbai?" deleted from your view.
Undo
 
(rate this)
Shiv-Sena 
26
VS
17
 Shahrukh Khan
Nikhil  |  Argues in support of  "Shiv-Sena"  |  1 year ago
Bal Thackery ha lost the hold , Uddhav Thackery unfortunatly cannot be like Bal Thackery and with Raj forming his onw party its survival at stake for Shiv Sena, so they are doing any act while gives them publicity and maximum ninutes in breaking...
Shilpa Gote  |  Argues in support of  "Shahrukh Khan"  |  1 year ago
Like most of us say INDIA is a democratic country and everyone has a right to say anything. As far as shiv-sena is concern, they just want to be the dictators, thats its. I don't know why they treat themself as a separate and superior part of the...
Priya Varadan  |  Argues in support of  "Shiv-Sena"  |  2 years ago
the sena did it with south indians, muslims before and now sharukh, UP, bihari.. 2morow it will be some one else.. lets not justify it in the name culture and nationalism.. Nationalism and regionaisml can go together.. but no extremism, please
 support: 
 
 
Debate: "Who is responsible for the ongoing tension in Mumbai?" deleted from your view.
Undo
 
(rate this)
Yes 
12
VS
8
 No
shashikala s wagdarikar  |  Argues in support of  "Yes"  |  1 year ago
  By going to the cost involved for deploying the policemen in the 63 theaters in Mumbai will be a costly affair for the State. But its the government duty to keep the law and order in the state. A politicial leader and his party taking the law...
Dhirendra Bengeri  |  Argues in support of  "No"  |  2 years ago
Check the link http://ibnlive.in.com/news/mumbai-theatres-play-safe-with-shiv-sena/109932-3.html?utm_source=IBNLive_10feb10_MCDB_100210 utm_medium=mailer  
Sarika Singh  |  Argues in support of  "Yes"  |  2 years ago
By seeing the cost involved for deploying the policemen in the 63 theaters in Mumbai will be a costly affair for the State. But its the government duty to keep the law and order in the state. A politicial leader and his party taking the law in...
 support: 
 
 
Debate: "Is it worth releasing of "My Name is Khan"?" deleted from your view.
Undo
 
(rate this)
Shiv sena should be banned 
9
VS
5
 Should not be banned to maintain balance
Kaushik Saha  |  Argues in support of  "Should not be banned to maintain balance"  |  1 year ago
Let us ban them so we create another Kashmir in Maharashtra,and the commercial capital called Mumbai is finished.
Prasad PN  |  Argues in support of  "Shiv sena should be banned"  |  2 years ago
It is not only Shiv Sena that is threatening peace in India, almost all parties especially regional and caste/communal based parties indulge in such activities. Their leaders surround themselves so many anti-social elements and all parties make...
 support: 
 
 
Debate: "Breaking news: Shiv sena Attacks IBN news channel" deleted from your view.
Undo
 
Other knowledge matching "Shiv sena V/s SRK: Who is right?" topic
Activity: 150 referals , 3 comments, 100 views  
Which way is the dancer spinning… clockwise or counter-clockwise? Most people will see her turning counter-clockwise, which apparently means you’re more left brained (logical). I see her spinning that way, and it’s at first almost impossible to imagine her going clockwise. But it happens, usually by focusing or when something unexpectedly alters your perception. Here’s the typical run down on left versus right brain: LEFT BRAIN FUNCTIONS uses logic  detail oriented  facts rule  words and language  present and past  math and science  can comprehend  knowing  acknowledges  order/pattern perception  knows object name  reality based  forms strategies  practical  safe RIGHT BRAIN FUNCTIONS uses feeling  “big picture” oriented  imagination rules  symbols and images  present and future  philosophy religion  can “get it” (i.e. meaning)  believes  appreciates  spatial perception  knows object function  fantasy based  presents possibilities  impetuous  risk taking Many people associate the...
Activity: 0 referals , 3 comments, 59 views  
From 15th June 2011 Every Advocate shall be entitled as of right to practice before any court in India including Supreme Court. Section 30 of the Act says: “Subject to the provisions of this Act, every advocate shall be entitled as of right to practise throughout the territories to which this Act extends; in all courts including the Supreme Court; before any tribunal or person legally authorised to take evidence; and before any other authority or person before whom such advocate is by or under any law for the time being in force entitled to practise. Earlier, the Supreme Court in Aeltemesh Rein vs. Union of India and others AIR 1988 SC 1768 had issued a writ of mandamus to the Central Government to consider, within six months, whether Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 should be brought into force or not. The Court, however, held that it was the discretion of the Central Government to bring this section in force by issuing a notification in this behalf. In spite of the...
Leading Recruitment Firm
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
 
 
Similar Topics
Today there is much controversy over whether there should or shouldn’t be...
1 trends , 2 insight , 10 debates , 3 idea contests  
Changing of Society: In future Election changes to Examination: if it...
1 trends , 3 debates  
I mean recently we all saw in Mumbai a rule was made like, people who only...
9 debates , 3 idea contests  
Glamour!! Money!! who will deny it... IPL was created to give a chance for...
4 trends , 2 insight , 10 debates , 1 question  
Here we will talk about all the famous woman business leaders and financial...
3 trends , 1 insight , 7 debates , 3 idea contests