Today's Testing Challenges
Tags :
tester,testing,testers,tester jobs,software tester,software testing,software testing jobs,software test engineer,test engineer,computer testing software,software qa testing,software testing tools,automated software testing,automated testing,software tests,quality assurance,QA,software,winrunner,load runner,software diagnostic,software test,performance testing,regression testing,QA testing,software quality assurance,manual testing,automation test,test cases,software scripts,QTP,win runner
Industry :
Internet, IT Products, IT Services
Functional Area : Business Processes, Application Software, New Technologies |
|
|
Follow this Topic |
more actions >>
|
About "Today's Testing Challenges" topic:
As a tester, we have some challenges which are very unique to our profession and some challenges are more generic in nature. Let us discuss it out here & find a way to solve all issues pertaining to Testing Domain.....
Please everyone share their views on such critical subject.
Thanks !!!
Please everyone share their views on such critical subject.
Thanks !!!
3 insight
, 13 debates
, 3 idea contests
, 11 question
on topic: "Today's Testing Challenges"
|
(rate this)
|
|
Manual Testing more beneficial
|
42
|
VS |
20
|
Automated Testing more beneficial
|
 |
Aniket Kumar
| Argues in support of
"Automated Testing more beneficial"
| 1 year ago
|
|
as far as possible testing large scale products manually will kill a lot of time. and in the mean while we have to do all our work in time so trying automated testing will save time , cost and also increase production . but still technology has...
|
|
 |
Yogita Jaywant Patil
| Argues in support of
"Manual Testing more beneficial"
| 1 year ago
|
|
It covers all the part of the testing and where you want users feedback then it is the only way to get it.
|
|
 |
Diptanjan Mukherjee
| Argues in support of
"Manual Testing more beneficial"
| 2 years ago
|
|
Both are important in it's own place. Before any automated testing one round of manual testing is recomemded to filter out the basic bugs. More over Manual Testing is followed in more places in this industry.
|
|
Debate: "Manual Testing vs Automated Testing" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
How relationship between Tester developers should grow up ? Please Advice....
|
|
pushpalatha
| Answered
| 1 year ago
|
|
developer is the team who develops the code,tester is a team who tests the developed code and find bugs and posted to the developer.
|
|
 |
Mihir Jhaveri, PMP, CSCM
| Answered
| 2 years ago
|
|
‘ Create ’ means the first time effort to generate a harmony between a tester and a developer working on the same project. ‘ Build ’ is the next stage after create to harmonize the professional relationship between a tester and developer. This...
|
|
 |
Vijay Bhaskar
| Answered
| 2 years ago
|
|
The common aspect between a tester and a developer is the requirements by the customer. Tester - is to confirm that the code developed by the developer is in line with the requirement. Developer is to ensure that the code is written to confirm to...
|
|
Answer: "What is the Relationship b/w Tester & developers ?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
 |
Subhash Chana
| Answered
| 2 years ago
|
|
Sandeep, It would be better if you create a Test plan gather info related to: Scope (You should have information on what features will be tested and what will not be tested) Environment (What type of environment will be supported by product? What...
|
|
 |
Sameer Joshi
| Answered
| 2 years ago
|
|
It depends on the complexity of the project where one has to define: No. of resouces available. Resoure exeperience. Dead line of the project. And all other risks on the project will decide the Test Extimation. Test effort is measured by...
|
|
 |
Priti Dhanda
| Answered
| 2 years ago
|
|
I have to agree with suman that there is no simple answer for these but this are some of the approaches even I have considered: Implicit Risk Context Approach Metrics-Based Approach Test Work Breakdown Approach Iterative Approach...
|
|
Answer: "What's the best approach to software test estimation? " deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
Test Automation - everyone wants to use it but not many are ready to pay for it. Rarely does automation result in cost savings in the short term and as such most efforts for test automation are percieved as failures. As such it is really important to have a proper framework for assessing the feasibility of test automation for a particular project. A couple of points I like to consider in the automation fesaibility are 1. Longetivity of the application : Test automation would only be benefitial in applications which are there for the long haul i.e have a shelf life of atleast 3 years plus. 2. Stability : There are some applications which do have a long term life but are subject to major int...
 |
Darpan Sinha
| Commented
| 3 years ago
|
|
True I will say if you expect a lot of CR's to come your way automated testing can be boon as it will help you identify the impact of the change on other modules
|
|
|
|
karthik
| Commented
| 3 years ago
|
|
I feel whatever abhijit has said is correct but coming to the % of Test cases to be automated is entirely Dependant on the repetitiveness with consistency of a particular test...thats where automation is required in simple terms.... tools know...
|
|
Insight: "Test Automation" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Should be much lower than 25%
|
6
|
VS |
18
|
should be 25% of higher
|
 |
Santosh A. Jadhav
| Argues in support of
"should be 25% of higher"
| 1 year ago
|
|
It is always better to be on safer side ... so i think for any new product the cost should be more than 25%...
|
|
 |
Subrahmanya Gupta Boda
| Argues in support of
"Should be much lower than 25%"
| 2 years ago
|
|
There are few frameworks that deliver quality with less than 25% of testing effort. One such framework is Personal Software Process, where I experienced less than 10% of testing effort. This was not easy to achive, but the fruits were very tasty...
|
|
|
|
RASHMI BHARDWAJ
| Argues in support of
"should be 25% of higher"
| 3 years ago
|
|
i think the total effort should be halved between the development and testing team beacuse after the first initial release to testing team there can be bugs that arise and time is need to fix as well as test.
|
|
Debate: "How much % of development effort should be invested in testing ?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
1
|
VS |
8
|
No
|
 |
Ashish Marwal
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 2 years ago
|
|
I agree with Radha and Tanmay. Offcourse we don't re-invent the wheel everytime but can we get along with the wheel discovered in the very beginning? Offcourse not as certain geniuses applied their creativity to bring-up the wheels we witness...
|
|
 |
Kiran Kumar Reddy
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 2 years ago
|
|
I think today’s programmers are only left with simplified drag and drop development which inherently requirie less creativity.This means that we are at risk of breeding future generations of programmers with almost no deep-dive knowledge of...
|
|
 |
Tanmay Gaur
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 2 years ago
|
|
No, I don't think so. Software development has actually risen from basic file handling to handling APIs for data response and request. You still need to have the basics intact. Ofcourse, we do not need to code everything now as basic functions...
|
|
Debate: "Is creative software development dead?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
1
Execute
2
Scope and Quality of Testing
 |
varsha
| Supported idea
"Execute"
| 2 years ago
|
|
yes i do agree with mr. marar, and ill support this idea
|
|
 |
Ajay
| Added idea
"Scope and Quality of Testing"
| 2 years ago
|
|
If the tester has the domain knowledge about the application he is testing then definitely he has an advantage. Having the domain knowledge provides him an implicit advantage, a background about what he is testing and what outcome should be...
|
|
|
|
Tanmay Gaur
| Supported idea
"Execute"
| 2 years ago
|
|
I support the idea. Right from the start of the project, when a project manager puts in his understanding to the user requirements about the project, we need the whole team to have some domain knowledge. Test cases, UI design, exception handling...
|
|
Ideate: "How Domain knowledge is Important for testers?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
1
try to hack the system yourself
2
Security testing
|
|
Amit Maniar
| Added idea
"Blackbox Testing"
| 1 year ago
|
|
External person should test the system with out getting into system flow. But he must know what the system is doing..
|
|
 |
Swapnil Patil
| Supported idea
"Security testing"
| 2 years ago
|
|
Hi All, Thanks Sameer for the topic which surely interests all of us. I support the 'Security testing' however there is a thin line between Security Testing and hacking as both activities can be performed with varied intentions. There is no fixed...
|
|
|
|
Vijay Shanker Dubey
| Supported idea
"try to hack the system yourself"
| 2 years ago
|
|
I will point out my view to make secure a website. Secure resources access Give Right to operate on a resource Every operation should be checked if current subject has right to perform that operation I will discuss here my first point to make a...
|
|
Ideate: "How to make sure your web application is secure before release?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
How Security testing of web applications against SQL Injection is done? Please suggest!!!
Answer: "How to Test Web Applications against SQL Injection Attacks ?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
11
|
VS |
5
|
No
|
 |
Chandra Prakash Agrawal
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 1 year ago
|
|
i assured u we can do this usib=ng test cases .
|
|
 |
Raj
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 1 year ago
|
|
i am not of application field but believe an application is fully tested after going live....
|
|
 |
Vishal Garg
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 2 years ago
|
|
I have seen it several times that we find bugs in an application doing something which we dont mention in the test cases. I think that random testing results in more bugs rather than a sequential testing.
|
|
Debate: "Do we really break an application using our test cases while testing?" deleted from your view.
Other knowledge matching "Today's Testing Challenges" topic
|
Activity:
0 referals
,
3 comments,
115 views
|
|
Why is using email marketing services sometimes a better option than direct mail? There are many options available to the business or charitable organization that is in need of a way to better communicate with their target audience. Two of the most popular are email marketing and direct mail. While both have their pros and cons, email is often a better option than its traditional counterpart. This article will explain why by highlighting some of the advantages it has over direct mail. Cost Effectiveness One of the best qualities email marketing has going for it is its low cost. The price you would pay to reach hundreds or even thousands of contacts is downright cheap in comparison to trying to connect with the same number of people with direct mail. More businesses are finding out that such traditional methods are cost prohibitive in today’s economy. With direct mail, you have to factor in the cost for creating your actual marketing materials, printing it all out, and mailing it to...
|
Recent Knowledge in Topic (20)
|
|
|
2 referals
0 answers,
37 views
|
|
|
|
In TDD(Test-driven development ) model where a test engineer need to have good expertise in... |
|
|
0 referals
1 arguments,
50 views
|
|
|
|
hello priyanka i have completed mscit in 2006 ia m searching for true as trainee in mumbai for... |
|
|
1 referals
0 answers,
36 views
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Topics
2 question
Lets us all discuss and share our views over the testing opportunities...
2 question
2 debates
, 1 question
3 insight
, 3 debates
, 2 question
There are ample opportunities for new energy entrepreneurs, but motivation...
7 debates
Sponsored Jobs
