Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 1 of 2 in Topic  Next >>
Topic : SOPA/PIPA : We need an iRevolution
  Rate : 
Associated with other topics :
  Rate : 
  Rate : 
Posted in Community :

Participants In Growth (PIG)

Industry : Internet Functional Area : New Technologies
Activity:  5 comments  152 views  last activity : 01 25 2012 05:03:09 +0000
 Refer 130
Share
 
 
 

Information I considered best to be shared which I have searched through the Internet.

Stop Online Piracy Act or SOPA :-

This bill would establish a system for taking down websites that the Justice Department determines to be dedicated to copyright infringment. The DoJ or the copyright owner would be able to commence a legal action against any site they deem to have "only limited purpose or use other than infringement," and the DoJ would be allowed to demand that search engines, social networking sites and domain name services block access to the targeted site. It would also make unauthorized web streaming of copyrighted content a felony with a possible penalty up to five years in prison. This bill combines two separate Senate bills -- S.968 and S.978 -- into one big House bill.

Official Summary

10/26/2011--Introduced.Stop Online Piracy Act - Authorizes the Attorney General (AG) to seek a court order against a U.S.-directed foreign Internet site committing or facilitating online piracy to require the owner, operator, or domain name registrant, or the site or domain name itself if such persons are unable to be found, to cease and desist further activities constituting specified intellectual property offenses under the federal criminal code including criminal copyright infringement, unauthorized fixation and trafficking of sound recordings or videos of live musical performances, the recording of exhibited motion pictures, or trafficking in counterfeit labels, goods, or services. Sets forth an additional two-step process that allows an intellectual property right holder harmed by a U.S.-directed site dedicated to infringement, or a site promoted or used for infringement under certain circumstances, to first provide a written notification identifying the site to related payment network providers and Internet advertising services requiring such entities to forward the notification and suspend their services to such an identified site unless the site's owner, operator, or domain name registrant, upon receiving the forwarded notification, provides a counter notification explaining that it is not dedicated to engaging in specified violations. Authorizes the right holder to then commence an action for limited injunctive relief against the owner, operator, or domain name registrant, or against the site or domain name itself if such persons are unable to be found, if: 
(1) such a counter notification is provided (and, if it is a foreign site, includes consent to U.S. jurisdiction to adjudicate whether the site is dedicated to such violations), or 
(2) a payment network provider or Internet advertising service fails to suspend its services in the absence of such a counter notification. Requires online service providers, Internet search engines, payment network providers, and Internet advertising services, upon receiving a copy of a court order relating to an AG action, to carry out certain preventative measures including withholding services from an infringing site or preventing users located in the United States from accessing the infringing site. Requires payment network providers and Internet advertising services, upon receiving a copy of such an order relating to a right holder's action, to carry out similar preventative measures. Provides immunity from liability for service providers, payment network providers, Internet advertising services, advertisers, Internet search engines, domain name registries, or domain name registrars that take actions required by this Act or otherwise voluntarily block access to or end financial affiliation with such sites. Permits such entities to stop or refuse services to certain sites that endanger public health by distributing prescription medication that is adulterated, misbranded, or without a valid prescription. Expands the offense of criminal copyright infringement to include public performances of: 
(1) copyrighted work by digital transmission, and 
(2) work intended for commercial dissemination by making it available on a computer network. Expands the criminal offenses of trafficking in inherently dangerous goods or services to include: 
(1) counterfeit drugs; and 
(2) goods or services falsely identified as meeting military standards or intended for use in a national security, law enforcement, or critical infrastructure application. Increases the penalties for: 
(1) specified trade secret offenses intended to benefit a foreign government, instrumentality, or agent; and 
(2) various other intellectual property offenses as amended by this Act. Directs the U.S. Sentencing Commission to review, and if appropriate, amend related Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Requires the Secretary of State and Secretary of Commerce to appoint at least one intellectual property attache to be assigned to the U.S. embassy or diplomatic mission in a country in each geographic region covered by a Department of State regional bureau. 

PROTECT IP Act of 2011 :-

Establishes a system for taking down websites that the Justice Department determines to be "dedicated to infringing activities." The DoJ or the copyright owner would be able to commence a legal action against the alleged infringer and the DoJ would be allowed to demand that search engines, social networking sites and domain name services block access to the targeted site. In some cases, action could be taken to block sites without first allowing the alleged infringer to defend themselves in court.

Interests that support this bill:

Specific Organizations Supporting S.968

  • Recording Industry Association of America
  • Independent Film & Television Alliance
  • Motion Picture Association of America
  • National Association of Theater Owners
  • Microsoft
  • Pfizer
  • Outdoor Industry Association
  • National Electrical Manufacturers Association
  • Business Software Alliance
  • Association of American Publishers
  • Ford Motor Company
  • Automotive Aftermarket Industry Association
  • Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
  • American Federation of Musicians
  • Entertainment Software Association
  • American Association of Independent Music
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Xerox Corporation
  • Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council
  • Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
  • Major League Baseball
  • CBS Corporation
  • National Basketball Association
  • Advanced Medical Technology Association
  • Beam Global Spirits &Wine
  • National Football League
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • News Corporation
  • Warner Music Group
  • Estee Lauder Companies
  • Greeting Card Association
  • Adidas America
  • Acushnet Company
  • ABRO Industries, Inc.
  • 1-800-PetMeds
  • 1-800 Contacts, Inc.
  • Blue Sky Studios, Inc.
  • Bose Corporation
  • Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI)
  • Burberry
  • Electronic Components Industry Association
  • HarperCollins Publishers
  • Kekepana International Services
  • LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton
  • Nike, Inc.
  • Nintendo
  • Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.
  • Timberland Company
  • Tiffany & Co.
  • Comcast
  • Walmart
  • AFL-CIO
  • Merck
  • National Fraternal Order of Police
  • National District Attorneys Association
  • National Criminal Justice Association
  • Viacom
  • Council of State Governments
  • International Association of Fire Fighters
  • U. S. Chamber of Commerce
  • Disney

 Top Comment : Isaac Madhavan   | 01 23 2012 12:03:18 +0000
Hi Ardhendu. Hows' it going? Would I be correct in understanding that - in effect - SOPA says "Be original. Broadcast your own copyrighted content." ?
 
5 comments on "SOPA and PIPA... Acts of Copyright ."
  Commented by  Vinoy Scaria James, Consultant, Travel Hub    | 01 25 2012 04:57:33 +0000
It is not that nothing can be controlled on the internet. China is a fine example of this. It literally blanks out everything it deems uncomfortable to its regime. But the question is can we afford to go down that lane?

The internet coperates do blank out account holders in case of discrepancies in the password etc. This shows that they can cut out people who post unwarranted stuff  too. But also, I do have a begun to feel that voyeurism is the mainstay of the net, and this giant networking sites and search engines can ill afford to loose those segment. Thus the reluctance on their part. 

As far as the feasibility of the of blanking it or post deleting is considered, my friends who are better IT geeks can highlight us on it. 
  Commented by  Ardhendu Pal, Upgrading Knowledge Base, Researching in Computer Software/Hardware    | 01 23 2012 15:32:23 +0000
Thank you Mr. Issac for your concern about me. I'd like to let you know that I am doing great and my preparation for the Microsoft Certifications are completed and waiting to give the examinations scheduled for a month. Kindly do let me know about your health and happy being. Let's come to the subject matter, You have stated that it is like "Bye bye Google, YouTube, etc." right? However as per my understanding those companies will be liable to provide the results for search quarry but with some kind of recommendations or gratitude towards the original author, You tube will be benefited by this as it will generate surplus revenue through the collaborations with private broadcasting institutions like new channels and production houses etc. Concerning about Google Inc and other search engines my personal understanding tells that it is rewarding as well because the searchers will get the original approved content and no 'out of the matter' contents thus will be more efficient.
Please kindly correct my vision on this subject if found wrong.
  Commented by  LAXMAN KESHWALA, Freelancer, Telecom/ISP    | 01 23 2012 15:14:22 +0000
No body can control of any type on internet because it is not registered or noted at any where in government authority.So let them waste their time and public money.
  Commented by  Isaac Madhavan, IT / Technical Writer, IT major    | 01 23 2012 14:04:16 +0000
Aaaah. I just realised that providers of content streaming services and content storage to third-parties such as YouTube, etc might be held responsible for third-party content.

This is why SOPA is considered draconian. 

Practically, this means that they are shutting down providers of FREE third-party media services and storage. This is because most of the violations would naturally take place on the servers of these providers.

So what they are really saying is "Bye bye Google, YouTube, etc."
  Commented by  Isaac Madhavan, IT / Technical Writer, IT major    | 01 23 2012 12:03:18 +0000
Rating : +1 
Hi Ardhendu. Hows' it going?

Would I be correct in understanding that - in effect - SOPA says "Be original. Broadcast your own copyrighted content." ?
Add your comment on "SOPA and PIPA... Acts of Copyright ."

Rate:
Submit
Leading Recruitment Firm
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
Viewers also viewed
The latest figure say that 2011 has seen a downward trend in marketing via twitter and facebook....
 
1648 referals 12 arguments, 502 views
honour killing is the most brutal act vs honour killing is not the most brutal act
 
14 referals 14 arguments, 396 views
I am back from HAJ 2011. I will be in regular communication  with my esteemed...
555 referals 3 comments, 128 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (87)
Accounting of revenues costs in Entertainment Ind. 13 May 2010 2,927 views No Comment   A common...
 
0 referals 1 comments, 286 views
Many advertisements come and go.. Few make an impression on our mind.. Impression might be good...
1677 referals 20 comments, 643 views
Know Where a Wine Really Comes From by Jim Gordon The mantra of real estate buyers everywhere --...
 
180 referals 7 comments, 408 views
more...  
More From Author
Software is also a kind of product, so they are sold not served.
Simply put. This will be the height of vandalism of professionalism in the context of business etiquette. Only it will surplus the discipline of a text. Within friends it is okay but not with clients or anyone in that process.
In this case what actually happened is completely unknown to all other people. I suppose that Girl was, by herself invited those guys and got herself satisfied by all of then one by one and when it came to ask for her money, she may have been paid the...
more...